similar to: folder permissions with Windows client, Samba server

Hi everybody - I'm trying to write a Perl wrapper for some rsync tasks that need doing. Problem is, there's some sort of odd interaction going on between Perl and the daemon mode communication for the rsync client, and I'm at my wit's end in trying to figure it out. Here's the Perl script: #####################################################

Hello all - I am running rsync 2.5.6 on two FreeBSD 5.0 machines. I have experimented with running rsync using ssh, with command lines like the following: rsync -rv --progress jimbo@192.68.100.10:/usr/share/smbshare /usr/home/jimbo And also with running rsync as a daemon on the master server, and syncing to it from the other machine like so: rsync -rv --progress 192.168.100.10::test

Hello, After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something wrong. Please see the setup below and point to what I am doing wrong.

Hello, I have a general administrative question concerning Samba shares. I have a large amount of data that about 25 users have limited access to. I only want these users to have access to a sub-set of this data, but I also only want the users to see that which they have access to. So, for example, suppose that the share looks like thus: /smbshare /smbshare/dir1 /smbshare/dir2

lib/CodeGen/RegAllocLocal.cpp:38: warning: 'NumFolded' defined but not used This has been introduced because of r46821. However, maybe removing just the variable isn't enought, because the comments in the section that got modified by 46821 are not optimal: if (PhysReg) { // Register is available, allocate it! assignVirtToPhysReg(VirtReg, PhysReg); } else { // No

> Reading the bitcode reader while working on another issues I found > that we already have a version in the bitcode itself (not the darwin > wrapper) and it is used! It is stored with the > bitc::MODULE_CODE_VERSION. It is used to select relative ids, which > impacts the entire bitcode, and so it makes sense to be based on a > version. > > If we ever have a new feature

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 7:53 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Right, that version number is used to resolve *ambiguities* in how to > > interpret some chunk of bitcode. It is not a generic bitcode version > > scheme, because most bitcode format changes involve things like adding > > new operands or opcodes, which are easily identified

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

I have a server 192.168.0.14 and the directory I wish to share is /home/photo I can mount from 192.168.0.1 with mount -t smbfs -o "username=photo" //192.168.0.14/photo /mnt/smbshare it prompts me for a password and I can see the contents of the share but I cannot write to it. Any pointers gladly recieved kind regards Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to

Greetings, I think I may be having a slight configuration problem with Samba and FreeBSD-5.1. I'm trying to use FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) to mount a remote Samba share onto my local FreeBSD filesystem. With the configuration below, I can read all (almost; explained below) files and directories just fine. All permissions are correct. But whenever I try to write to the share, the write fails

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client

We have ClearCase database on unix and users on windows. We are creating Unix users locally on that Clearcase server. Samba is also installed on that server. User windows machines are part of domain. Groups,usres are created on domain and same users,groups are created on unix server. Now problem is occuring when a windows user is changing the password for his domain login. as soon as user is

Hello, today i upgrade my printserver from samba 4.8.6 to 4.9.2 (ubuntu 18.04). First, all is working correctly. But whe im typing "testparm" now the following warnings are shown: ############## Loaded services file OK. Warning: Service printers defines a print command, but parameter is ignored when using CUPS libraries. Warning: Service print$ defines a print command, but

Hello everybody. I am having troubles to log on a samba domain from winxp and win 2000 workstations. I patched the registry with the requiresignorseal=0, changed the local and group policies (following various comments found on the web), and added the machine account for samba (obviously, /etc/passwd too). I tried with samba 3.0.7, 3.0.10 and 3.0.13, Winxp with and without sp2, and win200

Hi there, We've been long time users of Dovecot, and have found it a great IMAP server. I don't think we've had any serious problems in the 3-4 years of use. So great work. :) We have a IMAP inbox that is accessed by a number of different users from Thunderbird. We have a rule in Thunderbird to flag new emails as "TO DO", so someone can unflag the email once it has

I have a network of about 100+ users with a Samba 3.0.25 server with an LDAP backend that I configured myself (with some help). Recently I have had to add about 300 more users to my system and now I need to get a slightly less technical person to help me manage the accounts. I've been happily using smbldap-tools all of this time, but when I showed what I do to my hapless trainee, her eyes

On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 11:29 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > No one reply, so i try to clarify better. > > > I need to have an AD user that need to *write* in an users LDAP > > field. > > The user case is a MFP (a set of MFP, indeed) that have RFID auth, > > and > > so need to 'register' the RFID cards ID. > > The system works with direct

Was hoping for a helping hand. Trying to set up Samba on a domain member server. The member server was previously joined to the kerberized domain using realm join and a system keytab file exists in the /etc. Subsequently I added samba along with winbind not being entirely sure if the latter was needed. This is a Redhat 7.4 server. My smb.conf appears as follows. [global] password server = *

(I'm not subscribed to the list: please keep me in CC) I'm copying files between two samba server using robocopy from a third Windows PC and i'm experiencing disk usage that is much higher on the destination PC. The origin samba server is Debian Lenny with samba 3.2.5. The destination samba server is Debian Wheezy with samba 3.6.9 The PC running robocopy is Windows Server 2003 with

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello, > > After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something