similar to: about samba user issue

I was trying to learn cross building an R pcakage for windows on my linux machine. I picked a relatively small library gee to test. I downloaded the cross-tools and put them in my path, jyan at ludwig:/a3/jyan/src/R-1.2.1/src/gnuwin32$ echo $PATH /home/jyan/cross-tools/bin:/home/jyan/cross-tools/i386-mingw32msvc/bin: /usr/lib:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games Following the

During my update from 5.2 to 5.3 I saw these lines during the update of kernel-PAE Installing : kernel-PAE [153/477] Warning: Module vboxnetflt.ko from kernel 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.i686 has no modversions, so it cannot be reused for kernel 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5PAE Warning: Module vboxdrv.ko from kernel 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.i686 has no modversions, so it

I downloaded geepack from your site and installed it from the zip file. However, although it appears under my library directory, I could not load into R. Regards John Sendak platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 6.0 year 2002 month 10

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:49:14PM +0200, Sebastien Douche wrote: > On Ubuntu 12.04, I'm trying to create a second disk for a VM. The disk > seems work well (and mounted) but I don't like the cfdisk / fdisk > message. > > # virt-make-fs --partition --size=+300M --type=ext3 --format=qcow2 > srv-2912.tar.gz datadisk-test.qcow2 > Formatting 'datadisk-test.qcow2',

Hi there, I have looked for a solution to my problem on the Internet (and in particular this mailing list), but couldn't find one, probably due to searching for the wrong thing :-) I have an RPI running Samba version 4.9.5-Debian. "pdbedit -L" shows that the user "smbuser" exists. I used "smbpassword" to set the password of "smbuser". I also have

I have a tiny R script performing two tasks, the first one of which may contain error. mammon(12)% cat z.R version options(show.error.messages = FALSE) try(b <- log("foo")) ## task 1 1 + 2 ## task 2 Running in batch mode from a solaries machine, the second task never got started; see below: mammon(13)% R BATCH --vanilla -q z.R mammon(14)% cat z.Rout >

After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longer add new users. Any users that were added beforehand work fine. Any users that I attempt to create cannot login (error: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE). I was able to get one new user account to work (see below), but I cannot add any new users. The server is Ubuntu 9.10 running Samba 3.4.0. I am using: security = user pam password change = yes Updating

Sorry to post again, but this doesn't seem to be showing on the news server. "Jon Fanti" <jon.fanti@stoopid.me.uk> wrote in message news:... > Hi, > > I have a samba PDC running at home as the domain "WONDERLAND". I have a > Windows 2000 SP4 machine and a Windows XP SP1 machine. The Windows 2000 > machine will join and allow user logins to the domain

> OK, I think your problem is that you are trying to run your AD domain as if it is still an NT4-style domain. This does not sound like a surprise to me. ;-) > with AD, you would add […] to each users object in AD. You can do this with ADUC or by creating an ldif file on the DC and then use ldbmodify to add it. Oh, yes, you're right, I had to do the same for the logon.cmd, I already

Hi all! I am running SXCE 121 on a dual quad-core X2200M2 (64 bit of course). During an installation of a NetBSD 5.0.1 PVM domU, the entire machine crashed with a kernel panic. Here''s what I managed to salvage from the LOM console of the machine: Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51712 (xdb5) offline Sep 2 18:55:19 glaurung genunix: /xpvd/xdb@41,51728 (xdb6) offline

On 28/06/16 12:23, Thomas DEBESSE wrote: > > OK, I think your problem is that you are trying to run your AD > domain as if it is still an NT4-style domain. > > This does not sound like a surprise to me. ;-) > > > with AD, you would add […] to each users object in AD. You can do > this with ADUC or by creating an ldif file on the DC and then use > ldbmodify to add

Hi there, Sorry to come back to that, I tried to follow the code at https://github.com/samba-team/samba/blob/master/source3/auth/auth.c#L214 (and below) but I still can't understand why one Samba client can connect, but the other can't. I can't understand why, with one client, the code would go into "check_samsec.c:183" (and return "sam_account_ok") while, with

On Mon, 2024-03-04 at 20:10 -0500, Tygre via samba wrote: > Hi there, > I have looked for a solution to my problem on the Internet (and > in particular this mailing list), but couldn't find one, probably due > to searching for the wrong thing :-) > I have an RPI running Samba version 4.9.5-Debian. "pdbedit -L" > shows that the user "smbuser" exists. I

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this.?? out of the blue all of my win98 machines (4 of them) cant access my domain.? I know they should be upgraded to a XP, but the app that we use on them only runs on 98.? the error i get on logon is: the domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been denied. at first i was thinking that it was the win98

Hi, I''m trying to setup my box as described below: - The Dom0 exports two disks as physical devices to the DomU - DomU use the two devices to assemble a software raid device (/dev/md0) - On the /dev/md0 I create a lvm volume group and lvm volumes on it. Everything seems to work fine if the lvm volumes on the DomU are lightly used. Under heavy load the DomU freeze up immediately. The

I feel stupid even asking, and I have a feeling the solution is something that has been staring me right in the face for hours. I can't seem to access network shared on my samba PDC. I've done this before, and I am using a similar smb.conf file and I am just at the point where I can't get anything else to happen with this thing. My original problem was that I could not get WINXP

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello, > > After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something

Hi all, I've managed to get JAGS working on my Ubuntu Hardy Linux with a 32-bit computer and AMD processors using R 2.8.1. JAGS is great. I've read that JAGS is the fastest, but that hasn't been my experience. At any rate, I have more experience with WinBUGS under Windows and would like a version of that working as well. It seems like I've read a lot on the subject and tried a

Hi there, I have a samba install on centos 5 with the latest version of samba (samba-3.0.33-3.28). There were two files that just disappeared. The users description is as below: I had worked on them ? both were excel files that linked to each other. I saved it as a different name than the original I worked from (which I found to be very ?buggy?) ? the originals are still in their respective

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:18:46 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <thomas at glanzmann.de> wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > > These shouldn't be set or are defaults: > > name resolve order = host > > passdb backend = tdbsam > > security = user > > domain logons = yes > > log level = 3 > > os level = 64 > > preferred master = yes > > local master