similar to: Sernet repository

Hi List, We?re running 3.0.28.el4.9 on CentOS 4.7 in a production environment with one minor annoyance. This is a very inconsistent behavior ,frequent enough top be annoying ,yet unpredictable enough to warrant this email. Our Samba server is serving up a wide variety of files but in this instance in particular are Visual Fox Pro tables (*.dbf). When a user wishes to open a Fox Pro

As the SerNet Samba Build key will expire soon, I wanted to install the new key with the extended validity: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/sernet-build-key-1.0-2.noarch.rpm But the installation on a CentOS 5.3 failed with dependencies: Fehler: Fehlgeschlagende Abh?ngigkeiten: rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.6-1 wird ben?tigt von sernet-build-key-1.0-2.noarch Any suggestions??

hi, newbie. i installed from asteriskNOW cd onto a 2nd drive. using a dell system. has a 'c' drive. on reboot. it comes up 'GRUB" and sits there. any clues? thanks. g. _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/

After upgrading a test machine to Sernet's 3.4 package, it looks like the "net" command is gone. This was definitely there in the redhat-supplied 3.0 build and I thought it was there in sernet's 3.3 build too. I installed all the rpm's - samba3-client, samba3-utils, samba3-cifsmount.... am I missing something? -- Adam Cohen / IT Manager Energy Biosciences Institute /

Hi List, Second attempt to get this issue diagnosed and solved. Samba Version 3.0.28el4 CentOS 4.7 The behavior is as follows when accessing Fox Pro dbf files. Users can access the files through the Fox Pro command interface without issues,when they choose a graphical environment (windows explore of the windows file open gui) the system returns an access denied message on the first

!! Tumbs Up !! Bj?rn !! and sernet Thank you.. Upgrading now.. I was waiting on this one.. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bb at sernet.de [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens Bjoern Baumbach >Verzonden: dinsdag 21 april 2015 17:32 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] sernet = dead? > >On 04/21/2015 05:23

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

Thanks to all at SerNet for the timely updates to your Samba packages! Your CentOS rpms do not automatically restart Samba after an update, so "yum update" must be followed by "service smb restart". Is this a deliberate design? Most RHEL/Fedora daemon packages include a "service x condrestart" in the postinstall script, so that yum updates can be completely

I'm installing sernet samba4 packages with active directory support on RHEL 6. Is it required that I install kerebros packages seperately? Kerebros does t seem to be an Install require . I wasn't sure if sernet had somehow rolled sernet with kerebros??.?. Any help greatly appreciated. Greg

Hi Volker, It would be useful if your 3.3.9 build (currently in recent) included the /var/spool/samba directory - it just took me a while to figure out why Samba printing wasn't working on a new EL5 server ;-) Moray. "To err is human.? To purr, feline"

Hi, I was just wondering whether this possible bug with the Sernet Samba3 RPMs for CentOS 5 is known, since it has not yet been fixed. When uninstalling the Sernet RPMs for Samba3 (in this case Samba 3.2.x) the %postun scriptlet fails every time with: # rpm -e samba3-3.2.0-36 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56356: line 2: fg: no job control error: %postun(samba3-3.2.0-36.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status

Dear All, I have implemented samba to right now in test environment to be implemented in production as? samba file server so far its working grt but I have one issue i have right now one share and want only the users who have access to the share to see it and the others should not when I log into the user who has no access I see the share and when i double click it ask me for username and

Hi Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu. Filesystem is xfs, grpquota and usrquota are enabled. root at host:# repquota /mntpoint displays the correct data (see below). In smb.conf I defined max protocol = SMB2. When running smbcquotas //host/share -L I'm getting displayed a value of 16GB for every user share. This is the value that is displayed on the windows 7 boxes when looking at the network shares in

Hi all, At the moment we are running Debian squeeze with stock samba 3.5.6. and are testing some new samba installations from ubuntu 12.04, centos 6.4 and debian wheezy. All running in a VM on a XenServer. The samba servers are member of a 2008R2 domain, using smb1 protocol all are running fine and we get a constant 90MB/s (big file transfer) on our 1GB network. We would like to enable smb2

Hi there, I tried to build samba 4.0.9 on a Debian Wheezy 7.1 x86 fresh install and got this error: [2717/3935] Compiling source3/smbd/scavenger.c ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c: In function ?scavenger_timer?: ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:482:3: error: format ?%lu? expects argument of type ?long unsigned int?, but argument 3 has type ?uint64_t? [-Werror=format] ../source3/smbd/scavenger.c:490:3:

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hai, maybe it's a bit early to ask, but is there a date when 3.2.2 wil be released. thanx. Louis

I am trying to set up a caching link between two points, that can be shared with windows and *nix. In both locations, I have linux-based servers with data, which have caching NFS mounts (that is, mount -t nfs -o fsc, with cachefilesd). These mounts are working correctly and I have tested the cache locally to much success. What I have not been able to get working is sharing those mounts with

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation