similar to: (no subject)

Hi, I use samba to share some files between some clients. I would like than these files are always view with -rw-rw-rw- rights by all clients event if someone change file access permissions. Can I configure smb.conf to do that ? Thanks for your help. Stephane

I have a problem with the latest Samba (3.0.25a) running under FreeBSD (recent STABLE: FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #41: Mon Jun 11 19:24:30 CEST 2007). I run multiple Samba/FreeBSD file servers (in a Windows 2003 domain with Windows 2003 DCs), and everything worked quite nicely until this week. After an upgrade (both Samba and OS), I have a serious problem with access. I am using pam_winbind with

We have a number of Solaris servers that we run samba shares off of. So far, even using ads for authentication, we have to set up accounts so an entry is in the passwd file for the user. Is there any way to bypass passwd completely and just authenticate via the domain?

Hy List, i try to use a newly installed Samba 3.5.6 in an ADS Domain. firstly i configured kerberos, it works. I can "kinit administrator", "klist", works. secondly i configured samba: smb.conf: --- cut --- workgroup = KINDER netbios name = DSCHUNGEL realm = KINDER.LAN security = ADS wins server = 192.168.120.15 passdb backend = tdbsam load printers =

Hi, I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is it also the case that the Samba permissions override the Linux permissions? Example: I have a samba share called "SHARE". This is disabled by default and is configured for write access by group "MY_GROUP". The permissions of all files and folders within /c/SHARE are 777 (rwxrwxrwx).

Hi all, I have "FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Jul 25" authenticating successfully against active directory via samba's winbindd(8). I need to manage samba shares via FreeBSD ACLs and CIFS ACLs. From my reading of setfacl(1) I should be able to set group permissions using the syntax of DOMAIN\group-name. For example: #setfacl -d -m g:"MYDOMAIN\mygroupname":rwx test

> _____________________________________________ > From: Morimoto, Mark K > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 11:26 AM > To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables > > Hello, > > I get this when I run ./configure. I have searched for other problems > and others who had the problem say its due to cc

Listmates, In 8 years, since 2.02 (I think), I have never seen this behavior out of samba. I run a stand-alone server with WinXP clients. Somehow a legal assistant created (not intentionally mind you) files and directories with ACL attributes set: -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 21504 2008-10-28 16:48 AUTHORIZATION - employment.doc* -rwxrwx---+ 1 cyndy ochiltree 12804 2008-10-28 16:48

Hello, I'm in a bit of a loss at the moment. We have the following situation, we are running Samba for a lot of small companies that need fileservices for there Windows Terminal Servers that they use through a thin client on a Fiber / Lan extention to our datacentre. We have this samba running on 2 linux hosts (Fedora Core 5 and Fedora 7) with a ldap backend for all the domains. This works

after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got the following message for each: May 18 09:09:36 gw kernel: ZFS: WARNING: pool 'cache1' could not be loaded as it was last accessed by another system (host: gw.bb1.matik.com.br hostid: 0xbefb4a0f). See: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-EY any zpool cmd returned nothing else as not existing zfs, seems the zfs info on disks

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5867 Summary: rsync with ACLs resets mtime on targets Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: samba@byshenk.net

Dear All I am facing a strange problem that I could not solve, so, maybe you can help me. Look at this situation: I created a new directory with those ACLs (through Samba using Windows XP) [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl teste #file:teste #owner:1002 #group:1006 user::rwx group::rwx group:suporte:rwx group:administ:rwx mask::rwx other::--- [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl -d teste

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work. > Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > Rowland Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 23:28:24 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare

Hello, Issue Description After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) access to shares stops working. Error Summary: [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992, effective(1278739538, 1278738945), real(1278739538, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) chdir_current_service:

Thanks Vardan, I will like to know if this scenario can work when peer is not having fixed ip and we use host = nasir.server.com ? also I have set insecure=invite,port what if i use insecure=no thanks again. Message: 24 Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 10:52:14 +0500 From: Vardan <hvardan71 at gmail.com> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Dialing a SIP Peer without using register strin To:

On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 at 20:45, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > That is what I was looking for, the default 'idmap config' is set to > 'hash', which shouldn't be used. Especially as it says 'idmap_hash - DO > NOT USE THIS BACKEND' at the top of 'man idmap_hash'. I can understand > using it for existing

Yes this scenario works on my 2 systems which are at LAN. I made one system as server (192.168.0.20) and registered from other system... it is fine but now there is a different scene. actually there is a registered user named abc at system1 (192.168.0.20) having context [payasyougo] which is used to do outbound calls. we want to use this user's context and account so that when we register

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:53:38 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Issue Description > After the upgrade of the Unraid server OS (unraid.net) from v6.9.2 to > v6.12.6 (which upgrades the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992,