similar to: DNS update via trusted machine account

Hi, Samba team! I am trying to install samba4 on FreeBSD 9.2 as a domain DC to join an existing samba4 domain controller on FreeBSD 9.2. I followed the instruction of: Samba4/HOWTO/Join a domain as a DC Everything is OK until I run the following command: root at mtm:/var/named/etc/namedb # samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\MTM DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID:

I have a dc configured to use the samba internal dns service. The version of samba I am using is 4.10.15 packaged for FreeBSD. Its build options state this: BIND911 : off BIND916 : off , , , GSSAPI_BUILTIN : on GSSAPI_MIT : off LDAP : on . . . NSUPDATE : off My smb4.conf file contains this: [global] bind interfaces only = Yes dns forwarder =

Thank you for your patience. On Tue, June 30, 2020 16:48, Rowland penny wrote: > > From 'man smb.conf': > > nsupdate command (G) > > This option sets the path to the nsupdate command which is used for > GSS-TSIG dynamic DNS updates. > > Default: nsupdate command = /usr/bin/nsupdate -g > > dns update command (G) > > This

On 05/04/16 20:23, Rowland penny wrote: (I understand this might be specific to FreeBSD, but I asked on its mailing list and got no answer...) >> Then why is it an option *in alternative* to BIND? > > What do you mean '*in alternative*' ?? I mean when I build Samba port, I can choose NSUPDATE *or* BIND99 *or* BIN910 (where "or" means "exclusive or",

Hi everyone my sssd log shows the nsupdate command failing, how do i test ddns separately from sssd to see if the problem is in sssd or samba. shadrock /etc/sssd/sssd.conf ------------------------------------------------- (Fri Aug 1 12:18:30 2014) [sssd[be[tissisat.co.uk]]] [be_nsupdate_timer_schedule] (0x0200): Timer already scheduled (Fri Aug 1 12:18:30 2014) [sssd[be[tissisat.co.uk]]]

On 05/04/16 21:28, Rowland penny wrote: >> Choosing NSUPDATE brings in another port/package, named samba-nsupdate >> and described as "nsupdate utility with GSS-TSIG support", which >> installs "/usr/local/bin/samba-nsupdate". > > Is this a BSD thing ? I have heard of the python script 'samba-dnsupdate'. My understanding is that it's a

On 05/03/16 22:55, Rowland penny wrote: > Don't use freebsd, but Samba 4, when run as an AD DC, uses nsupdate to > update a computers DNS records in AD. First off, thanks for answering. Alas, I don't really understand what you mean... Is it used to dynamically add A records for clients that connect to the AD? >> Is it intended to work with BIND (like the other two in

Hello I tried on two vms on my vmware Workstation to use samba as DC. I want use BIND for dns system. To join the Domain had worked successfully after I recompiled the bind. It seems the zone are the same but Samba isn't in the ns-record. If I run dcpromo.exe I get this error message: This Active Directory DC is the last dns-server for the AD-zones. If I remove the DC the dns-names

> So you never read this: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_Back_End_of_a_Samba_AD_DC > Which means that you probably never ran the aptly named > 'samba_upgradedns'Of course I ran this. Many times. I'm not stupid, Rowland. At least I can read:D If I've seen that Bind doesn't work, I had to change backend to internal DNS.I carefully read and made

I installed a third DC today. Replication works find, but as systemctl status samba-ad-dc showed an error w.r.t. dnsupdate I was running samba_dnsupdate ?verbose. Below is the output. It looks like there are some missing DNS records, but what are potential causes of this error: dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable I already checked what?s listed @

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 17:38:35 +0100 Jonathan Hunter via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > OK, the code from samba_dnsupdate : > nsupdate_cmd = lp.get('nsupdate command') > [....] > cmd = nsupdate_cmd[:] > cmd.append(tmpfile) > ret = subprocess.call(cmd, shell=False, env=env) > > And > $ sudo /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool

Dear list, one more problem. I've setup my host running a samba addc controller. Samba version is samba-4.11.6-r2. I've joined two win10 clients to my domain. One client has a static ip, the other one was configured to ask my dhcpd-daemon for an ip. Following the book from stefan kania, I modified my dhcpd.conf to execute some scripts I've found on ArchWiki to add my

On 10/12/15 14:40, Ole Traupe wrote: > >>> However, my 2nd DC is not that new, I restarted it many times, just >>> again (samba service). No DNS records are created anywhere. >>> >>> If I go through the DNS console, in each and every container there >>> is some entry for the 1st DC, but none for the 2nd (except on the >>> top levels: FQDN

I am trying to setup dynamic updates with bind_dlz backend, but for some reason if any windows client or linux with nsupdate tries to remove AAAA record, server just 'cancelling transaction', while A and PTR records (both on reverse ipv4 and ipv6) working fine. If i'am remove AAAA record manually via samba-tool or windows mmc then AAAA record can be updated, but after that it again

Having some issues with: samba_dnsupdate Specifically: /usr/bin/nsupdate: cannot specify -g or -o, program not linked with GSS API Library I've looked through the script, and cannot find these options called. If anyone can point me to where they're called I'd appreciate it. Cheers, TMS III

PRIOR THREAD: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-January/220292.html In the  referenced prior thread, I had an issue of samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names causing a dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable error. Ultimately, the solution kindly provided by Rowland was to insert dns update command = /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool into the [global] section of

hey, first, i user bind 9.8.1 as my DNS backend Well, I have a domain controller, dc1.example.com, running correctly and with the following configurations... == smb.conf == [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE realm = EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = DC1 server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes server services = -dns

On 11/19/2015 9:44 AM, Thierry Hotelier wrote: > hello, > we've just upgraded from samba 3.6.6 to samba 4.3.0. We are using > INTERNAL as dns backend. We have 1 domain and 6 DCs on 5 different > sites. Replication between DCs is ok as we can see with "samba-tool > drs showrepl". We configured them like it is described on the wiki and > used the RSAT tool

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin