similar to: Can't create file.

I have a problem with large files (>2 Gb) in a Debian sarge based system. I install samba 3.0.34 with this configuration: ./configure --with-smbwrapper --with-ldap --with-automount --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-ldapsam --with-syslog --without-profiling-data --with-quotas --with-sys-quotas --with-libsmbclient --with-acl-support --with-utmp --with-vfs --with-winbind

On 3/3/2016 2:02 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > It would help if you would provide some information about your system: > - Samba version - smb.conf - "ls -ld" of the directory - etc. Regards, > Marc Hello, version: samba-4.3.4-1.fc23.x86_64 ls -ld: ls -ld /home/blaster drwxrwx--- 76 blaster users 4096 Mar 3 14:15 /home/blaster testparm Load smb config files from

Hello, I'm having a permissions problem I just can't quite figure out. I can not access any directory that is owned by my userid if the permissions are 700. If I change them to 770, with my default group on the directory, then I can access the directory. This was working fine with Fedora 19 for several years, and it broke when I upgraded to Fedora 22, and still broken with F23. my

I've just upgraded my DM from samba 4.5 to 4.8, using luois repos (also, debian jessie -> stretch). I'm experimenting some troubles on some shares, seems that both guest access and 'machine account' access does not work. The share is rather simple: [wpkg] browseable = No comment = WPKG Automated Software Deploying System force create mode = 0664 force directory mode =

Hi experts I have a trouble in access rights I am running Samba 3.0.31 on Solaris 10 x86 64 bits as member server of an Active Directory 2003 R2 domain (MYDOMAIN) using Identity Management for Unix I set rights to access a sub folder of a Samba share. On Solaris the user "toto" jdoe can write a new file. From Windows, the same user can't. Itlooks like OK when the primary group

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers

I could still really use some help here.... After spending hours on this, I have determined that it's only my user account that is having this problem. Everyone else can access 700 files/directories owned by them just fine. Thinking of perhaps a UID conflict somewhere, even though there didn't appear to be one, I deleted my account and recreated it with a new UID, copied everything

Hi! I'm currently hunting a strange problem and looking for help! I have a samba3 fileserver (currently samba-3.0.20b, but problem can be reproduced with samba-3.0.7, but _not_ with samba2 like 2.2.8a), and I see performance problems when writing files with MS word 2002 SP3 from a NT4.0 (SP6a) workstation. Saving even the smallest file takes more than 10 seconds! Copying files with Windows

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

Hello list members! I joined this list on May 1st and I can see I have a lot to learn. Thanks to everyone - especially those *@samba.org folks. You are so appreciated. Background in my plea for help: I'm the IT guy for a family owned community bank in Southern Colorado. I am very tired of the limitations and security problems of Micro$oft and have committed to learning and using Linux

Hi, What I wanted to do was to export an FUSE based filesystem mounted on linux to a windows box using samba. I can browse and navigate the fuse filesystem without problems on the linux box. With smbd running I can even navigate the filesystem using smbclient. Unfortunately when I try to access the exported file system from WinNT the mountpoint of the filesystem shows up as a zero size file

Dear all, I experience now a strange bug with Samba 4.1.11 : When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : logon script = employee.bat But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even "%G.bat", it doesn't work : * logon script = %g.bat * logon script = %G.bat * logon script = "%G.bat" In the logs, there was a message showing that Samba was

Dear Ricky, Thanks a lot for your answer. But I still have two problems: 1. I am not using samba as AD DC but as PDC. 2. What I would need is the primary group... Do you thinks %WORKGROUP% could work ? 3. And should I use %WORKGROUP% in smb.conf or in batch login script... Thanks a lot in advance for your help... Denis Le 18.12.2014 21:58, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > Dennis, if you

Dear Ricky, Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: * I am using Samba 4.1.11. * server role = classic primary domain controller * domain logons = yes * domain master = yes * When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : * logon script = employee.bat * But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even

I'm having a very strange permissions problem with Samba 3.4.7 (installed via backports.org) running on Debian Lenny: If a Windows 7 or Windows Vista client tries to use Windows Explorer to access a user's home directory with permissions 0700, the client gets a permission denied error. If the directory is made world readable, it works. (For one user, group readable also works. For

Hai Marco, Few pointers. First, time is in sync? I guess it is, but check it. Second. Guest access enabled on a domain joint PC ? If you really really want that, then enable user guest in the AD also. But better is avoiding Guest access completely. Join the domain, dont allow guest access and configure it correctly, best tip i can give, for the software deploying share. [wpkg] path

Dear all, As nobody seems to know what the problem could be, I think it must be an important bug in Samba 4 that "forget" to replace %G or %g with the group name. Could someone confirm that it is a bug and that I should fill one, in samba bugzilla ? Thank you very much, Denis -------- Message original -------- OBJET: Re: [Samba] Samba "%G" replacement not

Using the latest SerNet 4.8.1 build, I'm seeing users being unable to write into newly created shares until smbd is restarted. Here's the relevant log part: [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229329, 5] ../source3/smbd/filename.c:662(unix_convert) unix_convert begin: name = New folder, dirpath = , start = New folder [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229375, 5] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1458(check_reduced_name)

Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: > > * I am using Samba 4.1.11. > * server role = classic primary domain controller > * domain logons = yes > * domain

Le 31.12.2014 17:19, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but