similar to: Samba4 Provisioning Segfault

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches similar to: "Samba4 Provisioning Segfault"

2017 Feb 26
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Anyone? >> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? >> >> > Hi, > > I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only >
2017 Feb 16
2
samba-tool domain classicupgrade smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument)
On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:
2020 Aug 05
5
[PATCH NOT WORKING nbdkit 0/3] python: Allow thread model to be set from Python plugins.
Patch 2 certainly allows you to set the thread model. However patch 3 shows that if you set it to nbdkit.THREAD_MODEL_PARALLEL it will crash. If you look closely at the stack trace (attached below) you can see that ignoring threads which are in parts of nbdkit unrelated to Python: Thread 4: In pread, waiting in time.sleep(). This thread has released the GIL. Thread 2: Started to
2009 Mar 27
4
[LLVMdev] Connecting JITted code to gdb
Hi all. I'm working on the recently-announced unladen-swallow project, and I'm having a bit of trouble getting gdb to step into functions I've compiled with LLVM's JIT compiler. The attached a_module.ll is the module I produce from compiling def foo(r): for i in r: pass I'm JIT-compiling and running foo() with: typedef PyObject *(*NativeFunction)(PyFrameObject *);
2009 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Connecting JITted code to gdb
Run with -debug-only=jit. Break on line 1148 of JITEmitter.cpp. The debugging message will tell you the address and size of the function that was jitted. You can then tell gdb to disassemble the code. On Mar 26, 2009, at 11:35 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: > Hi all. I'm working on the recently-announced unladen-swallow project, > and I'm having a bit of trouble getting gdb to
2009 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Connecting JITted code to gdb
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: > Run with -debug-only=jit. OT: I take it the recommended model for tools that embed LLVM is for them to accept all of LLVM's command line arguments on their own command lines? For Python, it'd be much nicer to make this stuff tweakable through a module at runtime, or even, for thread-safety reasons, as
2006 Feb 07
0
WG: AW: WG: proxyarp <--> OpenSwan VPN/Internet
I´ve figured out the following. I am able to sftp from shorewall 2.4.2 left vpn gateway x.x.x.14 (DMZ) to shorewall 2.4.1 fw x.x.x.11 with /etc/shorewall/proxyarp x.x.x.14 eth2 eth0 No very well. That´s not through a tunnel (of course a ssh tunnel, but no vpn) but with public ip x.x.x.14 to x.x.x.11 If I try to sftp through the fw to the public internet I have the same
2006 Jun 30
5
WG: OpenVPN question
Shorewall can run without openvpn, but you need it if you want to establish private networks through public structures. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:52 An: 'Shorewall Users' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] OpenVPN question Shorewall is able to work with openvpn but it isn´t a bundle of a
2017 Jun 11
0
[RFC 4/9] tgsi: populate precise
Only implemented for glsl->tgsi. Other converters just set precise to 0. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> --- src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/tgsi_build.c | 3 +++ src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/tgsi_ureg.c | 14 +++++++--- src/gallium/auxiliary/tgsi/tgsi_ureg.h | 20 +++++++++++--- src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_simple_shaders.c | 2 +-
2014 Sep 01
0
[PATCH] nv50/ir: use unordered_set instead of list to keep track of var defs
The set of variable defs does not need to be ordered in any way, and removing/adding elements is a fairly common operation in various optimization passes. This shortens runtime of piglit test fp-long-alu to ~11s from ~22s No piglit regressions observed on nvc0! Signed-off-by: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp
2014 Dec 02
0
[PATCH RESEND] nv50/ir: use unordered_set instead of list to keep track of var defs
The set of variable defs does not need to be ordered in any way, and removing/adding elements is a fairly common operation in various optimization passes. This shortens runtime of piglit test fp-long-alu to ~11s from ~22s No piglit regressions observed on nvc0! Signed-off-by: Tobias Klausmann <tobias.johannes.klausmann at mni.thm.de> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.cpp