similar to: Dynamic updates to "interfaces" parameter doesn't work

Hi All, I am using samba Version 3.5.4 on AIX 6.1. The installation is through pware binary ( pware53.samba.rte 3.5.4.0). There seems to be a strange issue with NetBios where it terminates with the following error logged just after starting. The diagnosis fails in step 4 of Samba Diagnosis test ("nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA_") because no netbios (nmbd) is running. snippet from

Hi All I have created a group 'test' which has the following users: brajesh_01:/var/log/samba # getent group |grep test test:!:13159:brajesh,yatish,usr1 brajesh_01:/var/log/samba # I mapped this user to ntgroup user, 'Web Master': brajesh_01:/var/log/samba # net groupmap add ntgroup="We Master" unixgroup=test No rid or sid specified, choosing a RID Got RID 27319

Hello, with samba-3.0.x an "smbcontrol smbd ping" was answered by all running smbd processes. With samba-3.2.x it is now *also* answered by nmbd and winbindd: [root@cs00 ~]# smbcontrol -V Version 3.2.5 [root@cs00 ~]# for i in `smbcontrol -t 1 winbindd ping | grep PONG | awk '{ print $4}'` ; do pstree -p | grep $i ; done winbindd(29908) - winbindd(29909) [root@cs00 ~]#

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 09:54:06 +0200 john doe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Bottom posting > > On 6/21/2018 9:38 AM, adam_xu--- via samba wrote: > > Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful > > info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer > > answer. Thanks. > > > > > > >

Hi, I noticed that smbcontrol smbd reload-config or service smbd reload doesn't reload include files. Is there anyway to get a reload to reload files that have been included from the main smb.conf ? Otherwise it only looks like restart works, but that causes connections to reset, even in a ctdb/clustered environment . The only other option it looks like is to just put everything into the

On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:17:14 +0700 Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > I have read man smbcontrol. > > I wrote in start message: > > > I have tried: > > systemctl reload smbd.service > > killall -1 smbd > > pkill -HUP smbd Forget 'systemctl reload' Forget 'killall' Forget 'pkill' >

Can you try this and adjust the path's in it. #/etc/logrotate.d/samba /var/log/samba/log.smbd { weekly missingok rotate 7 postrotate [ ! -x /usr/bin/smbcontrol ] || [ ! -f /run/samba/smbd.pid ] || /usr/bin/smbcontrol smbd reload-config endscript compress delaycompress notifempty } /var/log/samba/log.nmbd {

Hello! For a long time struggling with the problem with SAMBA, is I would appreciate your help! Problem: After some time working with files on the file server unexpectedly lost access to that server. When you try to access the server using windows explorer - a window of login / password. When you enter a correct username / password - again the same window with the introduction of a login

Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. Yours Adam From: Rowland Penny via samba Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 To: samba Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0700 Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at

Hello to everybody in the list. I want to close a samba share using a command that can be executed when i need it or scheduled with at/cron. I found that 'smbcontrol close-share' command supposed to do that, but when i try to run command it doesn't work. sudo smbcontrol smbd close-share My_Share It returns the following: Ignoring unknown parameter "use

HI! I have some question about smbcontrol reload-config ,please explain it to me.Thanks! Connecting samba share by windows,and modify the smb.conf(EX?modify the share record rw to ro). After that,execute smbcontrol -d 10 all reload-config. But it doesn't work on the samba connecting ,it's also the old record. How to let the samba connecting become the new record except samba

Can anyone suggest how to get around the following? [2009/09/05 00:32:55, 3] libads/sasl.c:ads_sasl_spnego_bind(300) ads_sasl_spnego_bind: got server principal name = exdc1$@domain.example.com [2009/09/05 00:32:55, 3] libsmb/clikrb5.c:ads_krb5_mk_req(593) ads_krb5_mk_req: krb5_cc_get_principal failed (No credentials cache found) [2009/09/05 00:32:56, 0]

Hello all, I am having a problem with Samba 3.0.0 (I have actually tested this with 3.0.1pre3, and seem to have the same problem). I am trying to add a new message to smbcontrol. I have put the code into smbcontrol.c, and I can deliver messages to the samba processes (using the command line: ./smbcontrol smbd <mymsg>). The problem is that messages get delivered to the Samba

Hi Marc, Thank you for your email. I think something is wrong with the command or syntax. For example, I open the share folder in a Win workstation(\\server\My_Share) and then run the program to close that share in the server console. The workstation continues to have normal access to that share. Nothing change. I think If the command were running correctly the workstation would not be

Hello. I just upgrade my kernel, smbd and changed my smb.conf. (4.14.12-1-Arch" to "4.14.19-1-lts") "samba 4.7.4-1" But now, "reload smbd" and "close-share" can not drop connected users to share. Because of that I have to restart smbd service for destroy a share right now. But it was working previous version and I don't know what is wrong right

Hi all: Thanks for your attention. I have a question about smbcontrol. A user has read and write access to a share and already connected to the share, then I delete the user from the write list in smb.conf and reload the config (use the command line "smbcontrol ALL reload-config" ), but it doesn't work, the user still has read and write access to the share. Doesr the command line

Hello, If I make a change to the smb.conf file. Can I simply invoke 'smbcontrol all reload-config', or must I kill all samba services and restart them? -- -James

Hi all, I use this command on my servers to test locally that Samba is alive and well: smbcontrol smbd ping However, it suddenly stop working on one of the several identical servers, and I cannot figure out why. ping command says "no replies received", while log.smbd says that it received a ping message, but cannot reply because permission is denied. Which permission? $ sudo

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 15:51:47 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've seen: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication > > I've tried to enable offline logon, and seems to work as expected. > > I've only found a little strange thing, i think related to the fact > that in my DM i've set

Hello Andrew, > I've got a fix for one issue seen here. > BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299 > MR: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/1168 Yesteray, I've deployed freshly released 4.12.0 and it still eats memory: top - 18:59:10 up 1 day, 25 min, 1 user, load average: 0.08, 0.13, 0.10 Tasks: 176 total, 1 running, 175 sleeping, 0