similar to: No subject

On Solaris 10 (x86), trying to compile samba 3.5.2 I have downloaded GCC 3.4.x., make, binutils (ld etc) and sed from Sunfreeware. GCC (gcc -v) has /usr/ccs/bin/ld hardcoded so the only way around it was to symlink to the gnu one. # mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.1 # ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld # ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/talloc-2.0.1 When setting some

I now have one PDC (Samba 3.026a on Solaris 10) and several member servers (including Samba 3.026a on Solaris 9 and 10, and Samba 3.024 on Fedora core 6.) Each machine uses NIS for unix accounts. If I start smbd and nmbd on a member server, I can connect to a share from a windows 2000 or XP client. If I look at the permissions on a folder, if shows "Unix Account/someuser" or

There may be several parts to the problem: 1. Winbind on Samba 3.4.x seems unable to allocate idmap entries (UID/SID or GID/SID) , whether or not the backend is LDAP or TDB. Winbind on Samba 3.0.x is able to create idmap allocation mappings with an LDAP backend. The two problems with Samba 3.0.x are as follows - "getent" would stop showing trusted users once the cache period

>From what I can tell it does look as if I have to run winbindd on member servers, even if NIS is used, to get SID's mapping consistently across the domain. The PDC is Samba 3.025a on Solaris 10. Two member servers are Samba 3.025a on solaris 9. If i start winbindd on a memv, the "wbinfo -u" and "wbinfo -g" commands show my users and groups. However, the

net use z: \\sambapdc\share1 <file:///\\sambapdc\share1> However I still get prompted for a user name and password. I don't seem to have a way to force the "net" command to connect anonymously. If I can force an anonymous connection from Windows, then I should be OK. (Again, this share does not contain information that needs much protection.) Thanks

net use z: \\sambapdc\share1 <file:///\\sambapdc\share1> However I still get prompted for a user name and password. I don't seem to have a way to force the "net" command to connect anonymously. If I can force an anonymous connection from Windows, then I should be OK. (Again, this share does not contain information that needs much protection.) Thanks From:

The wiki page settings control a netlogon security setting. I guess the "server signing" parameter applies to all the other traffic. But my guess - and it is only a guess- is that requiring server signing is causing the netlogon process to break since it does not support signing. The e-mail chain you reference does not make it clear if the samba instance is a domain

Hi Gaiseric, Thank you for quick reply. I configured my PDC as WINS server and specified "IP of PDC". I observed some errors in NMBD log, "become_domain_master_query failed". I am googling these errors. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Gaiseric Vandal <gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com> wrote: > If this is an NT4-style domain, then DNS is not essential. Things like

> > > Adding pdc1 to the hosts file (c:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts) > did > not make a difference. After adding pdc1 to lmhosts, "net use > \\pdc1" did > work. So in the case of pdc1 one, the name is being resolved as a > netbios > name (i.e. via lmhosts) not a tcp/ip type name (i.e. via dns or hosts) > > But then why does "net

Hi Good Morning, Thank you for everyone and supported me, I struggled a lot to resolve the problem. However I got a solution for joining windows 10 clients to Samba PDC (Samba Version 3.6.23) . I changed workgroup name is from "example.com" to "example" ( I removed "." from workgroup name), then i can able to join windows 10 clients to Samba PDC without any other

Just to verify, did you configure the Win 10 machine as a WINS client ? The PDC will not necessarily be the master browser (showing what resources are available on the network) - browser elections are weighted towards machines with newer OS's. You can adjust the "os level" parameter in smb.conf to bias the election in favor of the PDC but if WINS is being used none of

A couple of other issues to keep in mind... Aside from the fact that the errors suggest your W10 box is trying to join an AD domain, W10 also defaults to a protocol of SMB 3.3 which Samba 3.x does not support. If you resolve the issue wherein W10 thinks it is joining an AD domain, there's a strong possibility (if not certainty) you will then see errors in the log of the W10 box indicating

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ram Prasad Bikkina <parvathiprasadb at gmail.com> Date: Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:39 AM Subject: Re: [Samba] Not able to join windows 10 clients to samba 3.6.23 NT4 Style PDC To: gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com Hi Gaiseric Vandal, I applied these registry settings in my windows 10 PC but not able to join. It is getting below error. Note: This

Hi Rowland Penny, Thank you for quick response. I have set 'max protocol = nt1' in PDC, but still same error. I changed registry values as suggested by samba wiki portal. our limitation is 'we must be use Redhat builtin samba packages only. Will it support Samba 4.2 version for Windows 10 Clients which is getting RHEL 7.2 builtin ? Present PDC production server is running on samba

Hi, I resolved NMBD errors, but still same error in windows 10 pro, Could please suggest any changes in windows 10 PC. Applied registry changes suggested by samba wiki but no improvement. I am able to join windows 7 clients without error. Regards, Ram On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Ram Prasad Bikkina <parvathiprasadb at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gaiseric, > > Thank you for

I have not tried with a Samba 4.x DC. As far as I know Samba 4.x does not have this limitation. On 01/06/15 04:10, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > Does this mean that we cannot use mandatory server signing in Samba 3? > What about the later versions? The problem is that lack of server > signing is considered a security hole. > > > Inactive hide

On 14/05/16 05:10, Ram Prasad Bikkina wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ram Prasad Bikkina <parvathiprasadb at gmail.com> > Date: Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:39 AM > Subject: Re: [Samba] Not able to join windows 10 clients to samba 3.6.23 > NT4 Style PDC > To: gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com > > > Hi Gaiseric Vandal, > > I applied these

If this is an NT4-style domain, then DNS is not essential. Things like SRV records aren't relevant since a lot of the NT4 is back from the NetBios days. It looks like your Win 10 machine thinks it is trying to join an AD domain. Windows clients machines typically are using DNS to resolve server names to IP addresses. However DNS does not provide info on locating PDC's

Which platform? If on Solaris 10 sparc, GCC (either from Sun or sunfreeware.com) should be 64-bit by default. GCC from Sunfreeware for Solaris 10 x86 will compile 32-bit by default. For Solaris, you are better off using Sun Studio and Dmake. Actually, you are better off just using the compiled version from Oracle/Sun. On 06/13/12 02:08, prabu.murugan at emc.com wrote: > Hi, > >

As per earlier post, I was having problems getting trusts setup between my Samba domain (3.0.x PDC, 3.4.x BDC on Solaris 10) and two Active Directory domains (each in a separate forest.) One domain is a test Win 2003 PDC in native Win 2003 mode, the other is a Win 2008 system also in native Win 2003 mode. To summarize some of the progess- things work better if the Samba 3.4 is the PDC,