similar to: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented

Hi everybody I'm actually facing some strange messages in smb logs: our samba server is running fine but I can see a lot of this message in the log : Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: [2009/04/27 13:33:53, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2029) Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented. after sometime (one hour, one

Hello, we run samba 2.0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not

I'm seeing these errors every couple minutes from my Samba server (3.0.28... RHEL5 build). [2008/09/15 11:59:44, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2463) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented. I realize what 'currently not implemented' means, and since no users have complained, I assume the message is ignorable. I was wondering however, if anyone can

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for

Hopefully some one can help me wit this. I run ubuntu 8.04 server 64 bit edition as a local file and print server. I use samba to act as an NT server for 6 XP pro clients running MS Access database. In my log files I consitanty have the following error which seems to occur when there is more that one user accessing the database: Feb 27 11:36:24 fileserver smbd[11192]: [2010/02/27 11:36:24,

As I posted to samba@samba.org one month ago, we found the same error as Chuck Thier (smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.) as a possible reason for some crashes of ClearCase clients on WindowsNT (we use Samba 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6 and ClearCase 3.2.1). Therefore I support his wish, that this functionality should be implemented in samba

Hi William, I got no positive reply since I made my posting. Only you and another guy, who made the same experience. No answer to the question, what functionality has "call_nt_transact_ioctl" and what effect on SAMBA has the missing of this procedure. Sorry, Michael William Soudan schrieb: > Hi Michael, > > I'm getting the same message in our samba logfiles as you

Hi All, I'm experiencing some really funky Samba errors, and I'm hoping that some of you might have some ideas. This only happens sporadically, and when it does, I loose Samba connectivity for a while. Here are my Samba logs: Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]: [2004/06/02 13:29:01, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2076) Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]:

Hi, I've a question about a problem using a samba share in a UNIX AIX server. In my scenarious there is a fileNET server (running on a win2000 server) which use a samba share on a AIX sever for cacheing file, this share is configured for allow access to a particular user (pangol). It seams that user have access permission but an error is returned when fileNET try to write a file. Thanks in

Over the past 2 days, my smbd processes are multiplying worse than rabbits. At least with rabbits it's easy to tell why you wind up with so many... Here's the setup: Samba version 3.2.8-0.24 installed via rpm on a FC6 box with 2 nics, both on the same subnet. The samba server acts as a PDC in a mixed environment but mostly windows pc's running xp. It is used mostly for file

This message I found in my smb log file : [2000/01/31 08:56:47, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2387) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. corresponding code in nttrans.c : /****************************************************************** ********** Reply to IOCTL - not implemented - no plans. *******************************************************************

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

gid=500) (pid 30102) [2000/11/30 10:44:37, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2516) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. uname -a: Linux ***** 2.2.14-5.0smp #1 SMP Tue Mar 7 21:01:40 EST 2000 i686 unknown smbd -V: Version 2.0.7 nmbd -V: Version 2.0.7 rpm -a -q | grep samba: samba-common-2.0.7-4 samba-client-2.0.7-4 samba-2.0.7-4 ls -l samba*: -rw-rw-r-- 4312642 Oct 18 11:54

On a server that has been running smoothly since it was setup, and with no changes to configurations or network or anything, users cannot save a shared QuickBooks file. they have been regularly using, updating and saving to this file for a few months. All users are able to create and update other files in the same share. I have not confirmed if they are able to create and update new QuickBooks

I am running samba-2.0.3-8 on Redhat 6.2 in five global locations. All are fine except one. In this location when a user runs MS Visual Developer they are able to open, save compile and edit files just fine. However when they type either [Enter] or [Bkspc] to add or delete a line, in this case only MSVD hangs for several seconds. Insert several lines and wait 1+ minutes!!! I have watched the

Hi, i tried to running Samba 3.0.9 with MSDFS under Linux 2.6.9. The normal sharing of Directories to the Target-Server (also Samba with same version and Linux) run's without problems. Only the dfs-share to the same Samba-Server is not usable. The Share-Name self is visible but without cointain. I have compiled the new source with the "--with-msdfs" switch and have also check the

Hi Samba list, I ran across this really bizarre issue and was hoping somebody would be able to shed some further light on the issue. If this is better directed to the samba technical list, please let me know and I will post there instead. Background ========= I'm using CommVault Galaxy 7.0 SP4 for backup and decided to share it's "IndexCache", which is a collection of files

Hi, debian etch + samba 3.0.24-6 on 2.6.18-4-amd64. Today I got a panic email from samba. [2007/08/14 08:46:55, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2338) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented. [2007/08/14 09:25:05, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(950) c601356 (...) connect to service FD_Systeme initially as user theckne (uid=5053, gid=1068) (pid 16275)

Hi samba lists !! =20 =20 I=A1=AFm found error message Windows XP =A1=B0The network name cannot be found" When I try to connect to smb server that is mapped e: =20 1. I was downloading very large file 40GByte with torrent during 5 hours. 2. This error occurred!=20 3. But web server and telnet is OK 4. I retry to reconnect to smb server with IP

I'm hoping to get some guidance diagnosing intermittent smbd errors that have been cropping up in the last 2 months. They are sporadic, difficult to reproduce, and don't reveal much of a pattern so far except that the majority are generated by a couple of clients, although several clients appear to be affected. Typical symptom on the client is a hang when attempting to look at the share