similar to: Samba, IPv6, turning off NetBT and Network discovery

Our Windows 2003 domain controllers and Samba member servers support both ipv4 and ipv6. Our DNS server resolves hostnames both to ipv4 and ipv6 addresses. Recently, this turned out to be a problem when within a regular Fedora 11 update, samba 3.2 was replaced with samba 3.4. samba-3.4.2-0.42.fc11.i586 to be exact. Everything Active Directory related stopped working and I had to stop winbind

Hello In samba log file I've a message like this: [2011/01/18 16:04:04, 0] lib/util_sock.c:matchname(1749) matchname: host name/address mismatch: ::ffff:192.168.168.202 != pc-ser-tun.eda that fills log.smbd. I've never used ipv6 and ping pc-ser-tun.eda returns: PING pc-ser-tun.eda (192.168.168.202) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from pc-ser-tun.eda (192.168.168.202): icmp_seq=1

Hi Everybody! I'm configuring an IPv6-Only network, the OS i'm using is Debian Lenny 506 and the problem is that i cant put Samba 3.2 working. After configuring the entire system, when i try to join to the domain(net ads join -U Administrator), returns "Segmentation Fault". And with "net ads join -U Administrator -S FQDN_AD_Server" returns "Failed to join domain:

I've just about given up on trying to get WinXP SP2, Cisco VPN Client 4.6.x, Samba 3.0.x PDC and NetBT working properly - without long login and offline file sync delays. The VPN client is most of the problem when SP2 is installed, but all is fine with SP1. Being we have nothing but WinXP clients on the network, I'd like to explore disabling NetBT altogether, since the slowness

Hello u all, sorry to bring this issue back again, but I?ve been searching and trying all the advices suggested in previous posts and I still can?t see the samba server in the win network neighborhood. I can see the samba shares from win via net view \\servername but if I issue a plain "net view" samba won?t show up. only the win machines, the same i can see on the Neighborhood...

Hi Guus, Unfortunately, I often notice that even with the advanced UDP hole punching mechanisms that tinc uses, I still come across cases on my network where two nodes behind NATs cannot talk to each other because one of the nodes is behind a "strict" NAT that won't use consistent source ports for UDP packets that are sent to different destination addresses. More formally, this

Hi. We have some interest in using samba as a file server on a small device, but we have some problems with low amount of space on our target machine, the question is how low can we go? So far we have just made a quick samba packages that requires 22mb of space, however since we are not experts on samba, it could be us that are stupid :) What we want to have is a: Samba server that is

On 11 November 2015 at 21:57, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote: > it is entirely possible to write code that uses threads on Win32 and forks > on POSIX by abstracting the communication bits generically. Signalling could > work over pipes on both. > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365152(v=vs.85).aspx Hum... yes of course, but I

Le 25/10/2018 à 18:22, Giulio via samba a écrit : >> Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only solution to get Linux share be visible for the Windows "Network" listing? > > Yes, it's the only way to see the samba computer in the computers' list. > > When using SMB>=2, network discovery will use a different protocol > (WSD/LLMNR) which samba

Hello, We have Samba 4.0.21 running on a Linux machine with a share configured. It doesn't show in Windows 10 "Network" listing of available shares, unless I turn on SMBv1 in the Window features (and reboot). Accessing the share by IP or hostname works, even with SMBv1 disabled on Windows 10. Windows 10 is of the build 1804. Is enabling SMBv1 on the Windows 10 side the only

fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) >

On 12 November 2015 at 01:15, fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though.

Hello Tom, I tried the new UPnP support of shorewall, olny to stumble upon a LinuxIGD bug. Specificaly, the UPnP chain is read as UPn from the upnpd.conf . I double checked it, there some bug in the upnpd, it doesn''t process 4 lettered names correctly. Could you change this chains'' name to something a little longer? -- Costas Cavouracis <cca@freemail.gr> My PGP keys:

I am plotting three Pearson Type IV distributions. It looks like I have to plot the distribution with the highest value of y and then use lines() to add the two distributions that are shorter / have lower max values of y. The following code figures out which distribution has the max y value, plots it first and then uses lines for the other two distributions with a series of three if statements.

Has anyone successfully got UPnP and Shorewall working together ? If so, has anyone created documentation on how to get it working ? Thanks in advance, Mark

Using Ubuntu 6.06.1, Samba 3.0.22, VMWare. Cannot access shares using netbios name, but ip address works. >From a workstation command prompt (member of same domain as samba), used net view netbiosname and got system error 5, used net view ipaddress and got list of shares. Ran ethereal and attempted a session with the server using netbios name. NBSS and SMB packets are being exchanged

We just did a fresh load on a new Windows XP Pro machine. Dual Opteron 248 Iwill DK8N Motherboard with Nvidia Gigabit Ethernet controller 1GB (4 x 256MB) Memory 3ware 7006-2 RAID Controller Dual 40GB Disks Striped ATI 7000 VE Dual Graphics controller All XP drivers installed and XP updates. Connected to a Linksys EGW008 - 8 port gigabit hub Our linux server is RH 9.0 with Samba

Hi Everyone, I use Asterisk for regularPBX use it's made for. But I want to take it a bit further and use it at cmmand level to be able to send SIP notifies to restart a phone or take advantage of a phone's UPnP capabilities. Is Asterisk capable of that? If so, what is a simple SIP reboot message like and how can I invoke it from a Asterisk CLI? If Asterisk is not the best tool for this

I have 2 SIP phones (Cisco 7960 & XTen) behind a NAT provided by a Linksys firewall that supports UPnP. The Asterisk server has a public IP. Here are the problems that I am having with this configuration... 1. The 2 SIP phones can call MeetMe and have a conference but cannot call each other. (Yes, they connect but no audio either direction) 2. I have verify=yes in the sip.conf for both

Hi everyone, I am writing a small tool that will compare a file on my machine with the the same file on an rpm repository and then give me a diff. E.g. # rpm-file-diff /etc/samba/smb.conf will show a diff output so that I can see at a glance what changes I have made to my local smb.conf file. I already know about rpmdiff but that compares whole packages and not files. Anyway while fiddling