similar to: Samba as member in AD-domain: which windows to prefer?

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 14:47:50 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > >> Am 2017-07-11 um 14:40 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> >>>> Restarted winbind, did "killall -HUP" on smbd and nmbd. >>>> >>>> still can't login to DM via smbclient and that

Greets, I have to research performance-issues of a W2003-VM within KVM. Right now it's a qcow2-image-file w/ default settings within libvirt (configured by vmm ...) My question: what caching to use? writeback/writethrough/etc ... what to use for data integrity while not getting ultraslow performance? Found https://www.linuxfoundation.jp/jp_uploads/JLS2009/jls09_hellwig.pdf Is there

Am 2017-07-11 um 11:43 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:21:37 +0200 > "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Am 2017-07-11 um 09:34 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: >> >>> [2017/07/11 09:31:17.790046, 2] >>> ../source4/dns_server/dns_query.c:1019(dns_server_process_query_send)

Hi all, I''m stuck with a peculiar problem. I have CentOS 5.5 and Xen. I have numerous Windows 2003 guests and never had this problem. An application requires SQL server 2008 which is requiring Windows Server 2008. I downloaded the 2.8 Gig install DVD ISO. I create a new guest and connect the ISO as hdc. The system starts and says "Starting Windows" but hangs and no

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:40 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> Restarted winbind, did "killall -HUP" on smbd and nmbd. >> >> still can't login to DM via smbclient and that mentioned user. >> >> I assume I need to restart all the smbd daemons ... ? > > Well, you wouldn't be able to, would you, what with having this in > smb.conf: > > template

Am 2017-07-11 um 13:37 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> Having everything in AD, gives you the possibility of using different >> Unix home dirs etc per person. > > Not needed. I am the only UNIX user there. > > I only need separate [home] dirs for a group of users: > > some customers of my customer come by to do some work with a specific > software and I want

I have the issue that a PC running Win10pro in a Samba 3.6.25 (NT4) domain is not able to successfully connect to an Office365 account. With a local user the same account works, with the domain user: no I am not able to instantly upgrade to ADS and/or samba4 there, so I got to come up with a quick solution. Do the changes in the registry conflict here? I did: sc.exe config lanmanworkstation

Am 2017-10-09 um 20:29 schrieb Rowland Penny: > Unless you have done something strange like giving a group the > gidNumber '3000013', this is an xidNumber and isn't used anywhere > except on a DC. It is also probably one of the Well Known SIDs, so > you shouldn't remove and recreate one of these. Which leads us to > the obvious question, what was the group name ?

Dear James and Andrew! Thanks much for the help, it seems that viridian=1 solved my problem! I forced a heavy load last night and no reboots were issued! I confirm that I had multiple cpus assigned and dom0 heavy load started the reboot problema, but with viridian=1, everything is OK! Thanks again for everything! Regards, Daniel Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:55:13 +0100 >

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:36:08 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > [2017/07/11 10:28:51.553290, 3] > ../source3/auth/auth.c:249(auth_check_ntlm_password) > check_ntlm_password: winbind authentication for user [mueller] > succeeded [2017/07/11 10:28:51.553324, 2] > ../source3/auth/auth.c:305(auth_check_ntlm_password)

Am 22.04.20 um 09:41 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > iterate_query = SELECT username as user FROM mailbox Ok, we enabled the 2 users and they synced (after a restart of one dovecot, btw). What irritates me: on the new server I find less files in /home/vmail than on the old server. So something is skipped or so. I try to compare now ..

Hi everyone, I have a licencing question : do one need to buy CAL for every user in a Samba4 domain when there is a Windows Server as a domain member, knowing that the Windows server will be accessed using SMB by Windows workstations? As per http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/using_samba/ch01.html and many other web sites, one of the main advantage of samba is that no user CALs are required. And I

On Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:56 +0100 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > From: "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10 > Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:56 +0100 > Reply-To: "Stefan G. Weichinger"

Am 2017-07-11 um 14:00 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> template homedir = /home/%U >> >> works for me in this context, right? > > That should work. edited accordingly, and rm-ed that idmap schema line on DM. I now have on the DM: [global] workgroup = BUERO realm = secret.AT netbios name = SERVER security = ADS map to guest = Bad User username map = /etc/samba/smbusers

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:05:28 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 11:57 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Remove this local Unix group, you cannot have a group (or a user) > > in AD and /etc/group > > ok, done > > > Probably because '11029' isn't a 'RID', it will be a uidNumber. > >

At a customer we run dovecot-2.3.10 along with postfix and mariadb, using postfixadmin as GUI. Now I plan to migrate to a new hardware (bigger machine) and in the same step to migrate from Gentoo Linux to Debian Linux. So I think about how to get the mailboxes from A to B. We use one UID afaik: mail_home = /home/vmail/%d/%u mail_location = maildir:~ I read about dsync and wonder: * does it

Am 05.03.20 um 17:39 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 05/03/2020 16:31, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> Am 05.03.20 um 16:09 schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> >>> It took nearly 5 hours in my case and during that time, only the samba >>> binary was running, no smbd or winbind. >> Why 5 hours? Thousands of users? > No, just my small test

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:22:36 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists at xunil.at> wrote: > Am 2017-07-11 um 12:16 schrieb Rowland Penny: > > > Try running this: > > > > ldbsearch -H /path/to/sam.ldb -b "dc=secret,dc=at" -s sub > > "(&(objectclass=user)(uidnumber=11029))" > > > > This will check if it is a user. >

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 09:49:52 +0200 "Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 2018-07-01 um 15:56 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > > Am 01.07.2018 um 11:04 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > >> Do you have access to the Windows DC ? > >> If so, can you check if the computer (u1customer) has the required

Am 02.07.2018 um 12:23 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger via samba: > Am 2018-07-02 um 12:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>> I remove only the 1st line or both? >>> >>> dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab >>> kerberos method = secrets and keytab >> >> Both > > done > >>> Restart services? Reload/SIGHUP only? >>