similar to: How to get Default builtins added?

Linda Walsh <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: ... > That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)... Zero, or close to zero, is low. 12 is high. ... > What's a subset stream? This is explained at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html in the bulleted point beginning, "FLAC specifies a subset of itself as the Subset format." ... > Another

Emmanuel Florac wrote: > id TESTAD\\testuser > returns "no such user" and > > getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser > > returns a "2" code. > ---- On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups). I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:

Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users" > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups" It may be irrelevant, but I have: winbind enum groups = Yes winbind enum users

In the smb.conf manpage, there is a notation used, (G) or (S) for global or share. Does (S) mean it can only be used in a Share section (i.e. - will be ignored in the global section), or is that they *can* be applied at the share level, and, possibly set a default in the 'G'lobal section? example: "ea support = yes" Seems like that could mean that extended attrs are

Yes the machine I'm running this from is a member of the Domain. Mkpasswd works just great, mkgroup doesn't. Has anyone else seen this problem or know what the problem could be? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Schnitzius" <kevin.schnitzius@citrix.com> To: "'Joshua McClintock'" <joshuam@gravityedge.com> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001

"Linda A. Walsh" <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: > what does the exhaustive model search do? I am not an expert on the guts of FLAC, but there is some information about this at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation_format_overview.html and scroll down to "MODELING". > Does it try all of the functions listed under "-A" to find the 'best', >

Why is someone not setting up an email server conform RFC's and seems to be you have an ipv6.. so set the ptr record. Hai Linda, I do have ipv4 and ipv6 on my server, and im never blocked.. but i did setup conform all rfcs.. i block servers in the same way. so yes, i did set my reverse for ipv4 and ipv6.. what most people do wrong.. 1) the hostname must have A and RR (PTR) and MX

Yves Goergen wrote: > The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates > IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions? On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted lines a bit so they'd fit w/o extra lines between them using: (get rid of text before permissions, and shorten user/group to a few letter) find . -type d -ls|sed -r

On 10 November 2016 at 15:37, Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > Erick Ocrospoma via samba wrote: > >> On 10 November 2016 at 07:51, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> PROBABLY its a problem with your reverse dns resolution. >>> >>> >> ​Hi, >> >> DNS

FYI, the same bug apears if one mounts the file system using "cifs": -rwxr----- 1 user 2532415 2000-04-02 00:34:50.000000000 -0800 fo1.mp3* -rwxr----- 1 user 3876671 2000-03-12 21:33:20.000000000 -0800 fo2.mp3* Linda W wrote: > Summary: > There appears to be a bug in the "time range" Samba is using on > dates where time is scheduled to "Spring Forward"

I made progress in tracking down a problem on cygwin that's been bothering me for a while since Win7 and domain. when I do: > mkpasswd -D mkpasswd (434): [31] A device attached to the system is not functioning. A network trace shows that it's trying to get the home dir information from my main user. Wwhen it queries the info Samba returns STATUS UNSUCCESSFUL (indicated in network

On Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:20:41 -0800 Linda W <samba at tlinx.org> wrote: > Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 12:15:49 -0700 > > Linda W via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Is there a target date for when the 4.x server will be able to > >> support 1 samba instance being the domain

Hi, the below patch makes the query for the localized name of the local administrators group more reliable. Can somebody check it in, please? Thanks, Corinna Index: ssh-host-config =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/openssh_cvs/contrib/cygwin/ssh-host-config,v retrieving revision 1.15 diff -p -u -r1.15 ssh-host-config --- ssh-host-config 21 Sep

Among various problems since I upgraded to 3.6 (none of which got answered really, -- so I backgraded to 3.5.10 and started debugging from there, considering 3.6.0 too unstable/too incompatible for 'whatever' reason... One of the probs I had was 'root' couldn't use "net rpc" <anything> -- kept getting auth failures. Wasn't the passwd, -- could reset it via

Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sat, 05 Nov 2016 12:15:49 -0700 > Linda W via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Is there a target date for when the 4.x server will be able to >> support 1 samba instance being the domain controller and serving files >> as the 3.x server is able to do? >> > > You can already do this.

I've been going back and forth over the HOWTO on bringing up a new samba 3.0 server in place of an old 2.8. I only have about 2-3 users, so even recreating them isn't a major pain -- but what does seem to be a pain is password authentication. I was using smbpasswd before, and am using it in my 3.0 setup as well. I'm running a version for Suse90 pointed to off of their support

I hope this is the right list, as I'm desiring a feature addition in openssh. I would like the option to have a 'null' cipher (after the initial authorization, similar to 'delayed' for compression). It would have to be enabled on both client and server and server would never use it unless it was both enabled and asked for by the client. I'd strongly prefer it be able to

? stato filtrato un testo allegato il cui set di caratteri non era indicato... Nome: non disponibile Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20060525/ef972e9f/attachment.pl

I realized in looking at my smb.conf, I'm not using these in a consistent manner, and .... well I just don't understand what the differences are between them. Sure I can read the smb.conf page: %U session username (the username that the client wanted, not necessarily the same as the one they got). vs. %u username of the current service, if any. ---

To be honest, I can't follow you. I see that I have inconsistent permissions (but all the same owner and group). I did use a different mail server software in the past, but that's long ago and I can't even remember when I switched to Dovecot. I think it was Courier-IMAP before. Maildirs for new mailboxes are still created by one of my own scripts so maybe that script creates the