similar to: New Files do not belong to the User who created them...

IN SHORT: - READ+WRITE becomes READ ONLY - OWNER ACL Permissions for "another User" affects Group ACL Permissions Hi Experts, we recently figured some strange behaviour on our Debian 5 (Lenny, uname 2.6.26-2-686) + Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny14 server that i would like to discuss here. I cannot tell apart if its a bug or just lack of understanding. Here is the Scenario: I got a samba

Hi, I have a little problem : Some user have problem with file is read-only mode But all unix acl and posix acl are correct : ls -l drwxrwx---+ 19 root Utilisateurs 4096 jun 9 11:33 STEPHANE -rwxrwx---+ 1 root Utilisateurs 1027584 jun 7 14:33 dossier fraise.ppt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

My destination is :/Example(folder) / ITD(folder) / LW(folder) ,user(lw) of group(ITD) can enter and do everything(rwx) in LW(folder),the following is ACL settings On Freebsd: ----------------------- /Example(folder) : # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x --------------------- /Example(folder) / ITD(folder): # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::r-x group:ITD:r-x

Hi, I have a problem with the removal of inheritance ACLs of subdirectories. It almost sounds like only adding ACLs work but removals of inheritance ACL's not. By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. This is what I am trying to do, I have a share called media with some users /

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:50:15 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > > On debian you need : > > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > > I think you miss one of these. > > They are

In the fact, I don't undestand. I have no problem with deleted files, and I have 700 on .deleted folder because I don't need to have users be able to open deleted folder with deleted files, it is only for me. If VFS:recycle is enabled, new created files on share folder (not .deleted folder, not deleted files) permission to this folder are limited by mask and owner is "root".

On 07/08/15 12:25, Felix Matouschek wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > Regarding my permissions problem: > > Newly created files, no permission changes yet: > > ls -la: > drwxrwx--- 3 fmatouschek vipco-users 4096 Aug 7 13:12 . > drwxr-xr-x 55 root vipco-users 4096 Aug 4 10:12 .. > drwxrwx--- 2 fmatouschek vipco-users

Hi Rowland, sorry, I hit the wrong reply button in the last answer. So there is no other way than to use Windows ACLs? I was told with our old systems (Samba 3 in non-domain mode) the behaviour I want to achieve was possible when only using ugo. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny Gesendet:

I had similiar issue on samba 4.8 domain member (new files with wrong permissions), when I realised that You need to list all modules that You wish to use in "vfs objects" every time , there is no inheritance from global -> shares that is if You have e.g. [global] ... vfs object = acl_xattr .. [some share] ... vfs object = recycle .. On samba DC "acl_xattr" is

Hi, I wonder if someone confirm this behaviour or point out my obvious mistake - gluster mounts via the native (fuse) client don't seem to work properly with POSIX ACLs, example: [jim at puppet ~]$ ls -la /mnt/ total 24 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 16 16:49 . dr-xr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Feb 17 10:32 .. drwx-----x 3 root root 4096 Feb 15 03:00 arccontent drwxrwx--x+ 5 root root 4096

( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) I still think this is a bug.. why not a bug: If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. why a bug: User administrator and the domain groups are set by default by samba. and its not consistant at all which is needed for a

The parts of klibc specific to the mips architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 8dc79563c06020d8844b9e9b821741828039b59e tree b957c8fb1fddf486f5c26b1880726051d4f6aaad parent bc9b363b31d301ab94c115cccc2e079c0d318498 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:31 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Hello, I'm lost :-( I got a share: ------------------------ [global] workgroup = example netbios name = cluster security = ads realm = EXAMPLE.NET idmap config *:range = 10000-19999 idmap config example:backend = rid idmap config example:range = 1000000-1999999 map acl inherit = yes winbind use default domain =

Hi Mark, See below. ;-) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 22:50 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2 > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > >

Hello I'm running Debian Etch with distro kernel & Samba package (2.6.18-5-686 & 3.0.24-6etch9). In my smb.conf I have : inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes I start with a dir test1 with no rights for group smb-Users, rx for group smb-Inf, and rwx for group smb-Bme-Fr : root@samba1:/mnt/temp # ll total 28 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-01-04

Dear, I'm having trouble handling GPO's my DC. Environment: Samba 4.4.5, primary and secondary DC. I am not allowed to edit the GPO's. The problem occurred after I edit the Default GPO in the primary DC, and then run the rsync to synchronize between the DC's. The following errors arise when squeegee commands: Note: I hid the actual domain name. # samba-tool gpo aclcheck

On 30/04/15 09:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > ( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) > > I still think this is a bug.. > > why not a bug: > If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. > new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. > > why a bug: > User administrator and the domain groups

Okay, let's try this again. I have a Samba server, joined to my Windows Active Directory domain, and I'm having a problem setting ACLs on a share from Windows. On Windows, I get the error message "Unable to save permission changes on <folder>. The parameter is incorrect." and when I look in my Samba log, I see the message "ACL is invalid for set (Invalid

Hi, What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the below linked video: http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html With my config, the copy process fails/breaks despite that the tesztxp PC successfully maps the other (samba) PC in case the first (samba) PC is out. In the samba logs (even at log level = 10) I didn't see any information that can help me solve

Hi Ralph, Am 18.12.24 um 18:59 schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Hi Stefan > > On 12/18/24 5:40 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> skania at cluster01:~$ ls -ld /glusterfs/admin-share/daten1/.snaps >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096? 1. Jan 1970 /glusterfs/admin-share/ >> daten1/.snaps > > what are the permissions of *each* path component > > # ls -ld /