similar to: New Files do not belong to the User who created them...

IN SHORT: - READ+WRITE becomes READ ONLY - OWNER ACL Permissions for "another User" affects Group ACL Permissions Hi Experts, we recently figured some strange behaviour on our Debian 5 (Lenny, uname 2.6.26-2-686) + Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny14 server that i would like to discuss here. I cannot tell apart if its a bug or just lack of understanding. Here is the Scenario: I got a samba

Hi, I have a little problem : Some user have problem with file is read-only mode But all unix acl and posix acl are correct : ls -l drwxrwx---+ 19 root Utilisateurs 4096 jun 9 11:33 STEPHANE -rwxrwx---+ 1 root Utilisateurs 1027584 jun 7 14:33 dossier fraise.ppt getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

My destination is :/Example(folder) / ITD(folder) / LW(folder) ,user(lw) of group(ITD) can enter and do everything(rwx) in LW(folder),the following is ACL settings On Freebsd: ----------------------- /Example(folder) : # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x --------------------- /Example(folder) / ITD(folder): # owner: root # group: wheel user::rwx group::r-x group:ITD:r-x

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 10:50:15 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 09:39:46 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > And i did read the Comment to for Rowland below, > > On debian you need : > > libnss-winbind libpam-winbind to be installed. > > I think you miss one of these. > > They are

On 07/08/15 12:25, Felix Matouschek wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > > Regarding my permissions problem: > > Newly created files, no permission changes yet: > > ls -la: > drwxrwx--- 3 fmatouschek vipco-users 4096 Aug 7 13:12 . > drwxr-xr-x 55 root vipco-users 4096 Aug 4 10:12 .. > drwxrwx--- 2 fmatouschek vipco-users

Hi Rowland, sorry, I hit the wrong reply button in the last answer. So there is no other way than to use Windows ACLs? I was told with our old systems (Samba 3 in non-domain mode) the behaviour I want to achieve was possible when only using ugo. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny Gesendet:

Hi, I wonder if someone confirm this behaviour or point out my obvious mistake - gluster mounts via the native (fuse) client don't seem to work properly with POSIX ACLs, example: [jim at puppet ~]$ ls -la /mnt/ total 24 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Feb 16 16:49 . dr-xr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Feb 17 10:32 .. drwx-----x 3 root root 4096 Feb 15 03:00 arccontent drwxrwx--x+ 5 root root 4096

Hi, I have a problem with the removal of inheritance ACLs of subdirectories. It almost sounds like only adding ACLs work but removals of inheritance ACL's not. By default the access rights (including ACLs) should be inherited, but it should also be possible to remove the access rights from any subdirectory. This is what I am trying to do, I have a share called media with some users /

( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) I still think this is a bug.. why not a bug: If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. why a bug: User administrator and the domain groups are set by default by samba. and its not consistant at all which is needed for a

Hello I'm running Debian Etch with distro kernel & Samba package (2.6.18-5-686 & 3.0.24-6etch9). In my smb.conf I have : inherit owner = yes inherit permissions = yes inherit acls = yes I start with a dir test1 with no rights for group smb-Users, rx for group smb-Inf, and rwx for group smb-Bme-Fr : root@samba1:/mnt/temp # ll total 28 drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 2008-01-04

Dear, I'm having trouble handling GPO's my DC. Environment: Samba 4.4.5, primary and secondary DC. I am not allowed to edit the GPO's. The problem occurred after I edit the Default GPO in the primary DC, and then run the rsync to synchronize between the DC's. The following errors arise when squeegee commands: Note: I hid the actual domain name. # samba-tool gpo aclcheck

On 30/04/15 09:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > ( sorry for mailing directly bjorn, but please have a look ) > > I still think this is a bug.. > > why not a bug: > If i do assign a UID/GID to a user, then yes, this wil work fine. > new users and groups sure.. but now im talking about the default domain groups.. > > why a bug: > User administrator and the domain groups

Hi Mark, See below. ;-) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 22:50 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2 > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 08:50:00 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > > >

On 28/03/2023 15:08, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 01:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 01:59, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> I am having troubles with windows ACLs.? I have been following the >>> wiki >>> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) and must have messed

Hi, I migrated my Samba 4 PDC to a AD. Everything works well. I've switched from OpenLDAP to Winbindd after the migration. No I've this problem: Linux (for example via "ll") shows the Name of Domain in front of user/group. root at server:/media/intranet# ll insgesamt 28K drwxrwx---+ 4 root root 4,0K Aug 10 09:05 ./ drwxr-xr-x 22 root

Hi, i have setup an ad dc with samba 4.8, and then rigorously followed wiki tutorial at : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs However, when following the last part (File System ACLs in the Back End), I don't get the expected results : [root at mydc ~]# getfattr -d /srv/samba/Demo/ doesn't yield anything and getfacl /srv/samba/Demo/ getfacl : suppression

Ok, i clarify a bit more. \\servername.internal.domain.tld\users2\%username% is used in my AD for the home folder of the users. %username% translates to the username. I tried 2 setups now, windows acl base setup and posix based setup. Both fail for me. THE SERVER with the shares ( and is nfs server) The samba/windows part. ( postix rights setup ) On the server this is /home/samba/users2

Hi the list, I have updated to 4.8.0 after using 4.7.3 root at samba:~# /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba -V Version 4.8.0 I compiled from source with the following options : ./configure --enable-debug --enable-selftest Samba run apparently normaly, but when i try to edit permission via windows, explorer.exe crashes I dont get anything relevant from samba's log. But I get an error from windows

Am 16.06.2017 um 19:17 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:58:20 -0300 > "Carlos A. P. Cunha" <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > >> :-| >> >> ls -lnd /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> drwxrwx---+ 3 0 3000000 4096 Jun 16 13:56 /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> >> > > I have this sinking feeling that you have

Hi, i run a few samba shares successfully with CentOS 6.5. I have a program (CAD) hosted on this server. Since an upgrade i have some trouble make it work again. If a user modifys an project only this user can open the project. What i see is (for example): drwxrwx--- 2 admin bau 4 16. Feb 2014 test1 works drwxrwx---+ 2 admin bau 4 27. Aug 12:58 test2 doesn't work. getfacl