similar to: CIFS slow on gigabit, doesn't support sockopt=TCP_NODELAY ?

Hi, Since upgrading to Linux 2.6.31, smb shares on my linux box are no longer mountable by other computers. As far as the client is concerned, it looks like authentication is failing. But when I look in /var/log/samba, I find absolutely nothing about any attempted or failed connections. Both smbd and nmbd are still running, so they didn't crash. I just can't find anything to help me

For no reason that I can discover, my smb server has started crashing on me. I'm really hoping someone help me out with this. This is the relevant portion of the log: [2009/09/06 22:24:44, 0] smbd/server.c:main(1274) smbd version 3.3.7 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2009 [2009/09/06 22:24:44, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_connect(103) Unable to connect to

Hi honorable people! In self-education purposes only, I would like to ask is 35 Mbytes/sec bandwidth limitation of SMB/CIFS in Gigabit applications? I've try read large file (45GB) from server to client's dev/nul and don't get bandwidth greater than specified... But, using FTP or NFS I get REAL stable read speed at 80 MB/sec! Same picture in synthetic TCP tests. Why while SMB in

Hy possible that it is a setting in the registry. See ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-docs/papers/ I'can't connect to the link (ftp is blockt at our site) but you houl'd see some information. if blockspace from your ehternetcard is less then 9.6 microseconds, you can run in problems. hope you'll find something cheers peter >>-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----

We're abusing icecast in a true narrowcasting setup (personalized stream per mountpoint). The streams itself are created in a piece of proprietory (spelling?, i'm dutch) software, icecast merely relays them. However, the intended endpoint is an embedded device. This device has trouble with tcp/ip packets not matching the max. packet size (MSS or MSS minus header). After eleborate testing,

Hi Henri and others, Very interesting post about TCP_CORK. I would be very interested in having it applied in the next version of Icecast. I'm using Icecast in a somewhat narrowcasting setup with large numbers of sources (> 100) and between 5 and 50 listeners per source. All streaming is done at low bitrates (16 - 24 kbit/sec) and listeners use embedded devices connected by 56k modems. It

> > p.s. For an in depth analysis of TCP_CORK read Christiopher Baus' excelent > article: http://www.baus.net/on-tcp_cork Thanks for this pointer. I'd been meaning to reply on this thread, but hadn't got around to it, primarily because I didn't really understand TCP_CORK (the linux manpage is, as usual, fairly unclear on what exactly it does). Now I understand! > >

Michael, With regard to your comment below: > As a streaming server, it's fairly crucial for icecast to send out > data with as low a delay as possible (many clients don't care, but > some do). That's why we use TCP_NODELAY - we actually WANT to send out > data as soon as we can. Can you explain how some clients depend on a low delay when receiving data from icecast? How

On Monday 29 September 2003 20:44, DarthPeter wrote: > Hi everyone, Hello, I'm CC-ing the bridge mailing list since there are more people on that one and they might be able to shed more light. > We are trying to build a powerful firewall that could handle > several hundred megabits of traffic and we are running into a problem > with it. We'd like to be able to accomplish

Hi, I have a problem with file transfers between a windows systems and unix systems. I have one win32 desktop (intel e6400 2Gb Ram), one win32 laptop (p-m 2Ghz). Also one linux laptop (p-m 1.4GHz) and one opensolaris desktop (intel e4400 1GB Ram). The two laptops have built-in 100Mbit ethernet and desktops have 1Gbit ethernet on the motherboard. Both desktops use a Marvell Yukon. The file

We get the warning above whenever we use a ProxyCommand. We _know_ it's a pipe, so we can't use sockopts on it. So we shouldn't bitch about it. This breaks all kinds of things which use SSH transparently; including pine, which really wants the first thing it receives from an IMAP server to be a valid imap greeting... which $subject is not. $ ssh -o "proxycommand sh -c '(

Hi, You need 3 nodes at least to have quorum enabled. In 2 node setup you need to disable quorum so as to be able to still use the volume when one of the nodes go down. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 09:02 TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey All, > > In a two node glusterfs setup, with one node down, can't use the second > node to mount the volume. I understand this is

Hey All, In a two node glusterfs setup, with one node down, can't use the second node to mount the volume. I understand this is expected behaviour? Anyway to allow the secondary node to function then replicate what changed to the first (primary) when it's back online? Or should I just go for a third node to allow for this? Also, how safe is it to set the following to none?

Hi, We have a linux server which has the samba client running in daemon mode (smb shares auto-mounted via fstab). The source smb share is on a W2K box, and both machines are on the same 100MB ethernet LAN. Whenever we try to copy a file from the linux machine's local disk to the SMB share, we would get speed like 5,000-6,000 kbps, but yet if we try to ftp the same file from the linux box to

I'm trying to run Samba on a gigabit network. On the server side I've got Samba 2.2.1 running on an sgi Origin200 with a gigabit ethernet card plugged into a gigabit switch, and the files are being served off a fibrechannel raid array. On the client side I have a windows 2k box with a gigabit card plugged into the same switch. Both machines and the switch claim that everything is

Hello all, I want to learn about requirements if I want to protect gigabit network with ipfilter as transparent firewall. Which type of hardware is required to install FreeBSD + ipf (as transparancy ) . We use 3 gigabit ethernet to protection which type of gigabit ethernet carts are powerfull. Also, what about the NMBCLUSTERS , IPSTATE_SIZE and IPSTATE_MAX in ip_state.h. I want to collect all

Is there anyway to get gigabit networking for a fully virtualized guest? I''ve tried searching for this one, but all I get are results about gigabit networking for the host / dom0, nothing for domU. Thanks, Gordon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

I have been using pxelinux with Intel 850 1.7 Ghz P4 motherboards using 10/100 ethernet switches for about a year in a multichannel visual generation system. We are shifting to SuperMicro P4SAA 2.8 Ghz P4 motherboards with onboard gigabit ethernet and gigabit ethernet switches. Put are hung up because the diskless slave nodes will not load the (Linux) kernel from the master 2.8 Ghz computer.

Hi, I have installed samba on a dell poweredge server. It uses integrated NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet card. My issue is that i am getting extremely slow speeds (about 1.2MB/s) on the gigabit network from linux as well as windows clients using when reading from the samba share. On the same setup (same server, client, network) using scp,rsync,nfs gives me anything between 35-50 MB/s. So

Hello, Marvel Yukon Gigabit Ethernet is supported by CentOS ? -- -- Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com