similar to: Migrating to replacement PDC

Should have read this first: http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/upgrades.html#id2600749 Problem is I did it the wrong way on a few production systems. Odds are this is the second time I did it wrong. Running Debian Lenny using smbldap. It mostly works. Existing members of the domain are working OK. The first thing that got my attention is was not able to join a new xp workstation to

We recently replaced a failing PDC, and it seems to be working just fine: # net rpc testjoin Join to 'OURDOMAIN' is OK # net lookup dc OURDOMAIN 172.16.1.40 But the BDC now seems to be having problems. We cannot get new workstations (in the subnet with the BDC) to join the domain, and while logged into the BDC, we get: # net rpc testjoin Unable to find a suitable server Join to

Hi there, I would need some help with my configuration. I have tried a long time, but did not find my error. Thus I would really appreciate your help. There are three hosts: 1. h181 2. h182: Should ConnectTo h181 3. h183: Should ConnectTo h181 *Files under /etc/tinc/vpn0/hosts* [h181:] Address = 94.130.108.xxx Subnet = 172.16.1.1/32 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- *** -----END RSA PUBLIC

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

Hi everybody I have a Problem with Masquerading from my local net (loc) to my VPN (loc2). I can reach every Service from loc2 in loc, but I can''t get reach any service from loc in loc2. Has somebody an Idea where my mistake is ? Without shorewall, it was working. Thanks for helping Lars Technical Information : Shorewall 2.0.13 Suse 9.0 *177.177.77.X The first 3 Counts are changed

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

I'm currently running samba as a primary domain controller on Ubuntu 8.04. I am going to do a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.04 onto a new hard drive and install that distribution's samba package. This will replace my current installation. I don't plan on changing the configuration file (smb.conf). The configuration file from my current samba installation will be copied to the new

We are trying to configure shorewall as follows: 1. We have shorewall running at gateway (172.16.1.1) with NAT. 2. We have a number of web servers (172.16.1.x/24). These web servers are accessed through port forwarding at the gateway (172.16.1.1) and websites are visible through virtual hosting through a web re-director. 3. Presently the proxy server runs in a transparent mode, i.e., all web

Hi, my box is connected to 3 networks, eth0 eth1 wlan0. I want "my" traffic to go via wlan0 and everything from eth1 NATed to eth0: eth0 192.168.1.10/24 eth1 172.16.1.1/12 wlan0 192.168.10.190/24 I first tried this with two single hosts: iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o eth0 -t nat iptables -A POSTROUTING -j MASQUERADE -o wlan0 -t nat echo 200 Forw >>

Hello! I''ve the following set-up RemoteClient1 (Win Vista), RemoteClient2 (Win XP) do both connect to my OpenVPN box. They can talk to each other, using their 172.16.1.x tun0 Address on the server. The server itself (Ubuntu gutsy, OpenVPN: 2.0.9-8, shorewall:3.4.4-1) has 1 NIC that connects the machine to a) a DSL-router (forwards several ports to this linux machine, including the

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is this: There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is

Hi Tom Here is the output of shorewall status Thanks Lars [H[2JShorewall-2.0.13 Status at - Thu Dec 30 21:43:44 CET 2004 Counters reset Thu Dec 30 15:38:17 CET 2004 Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 38383 11M ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 DROP !icmp --

Dear all, I have a server with 4 ethernet port interfaces. Also, I have four clients that will connected directly (cross-cable) to one-by-one of each port ethernet interfaces of my server. |--SERVER--\ | eth0-- ------------------ client A | eth1-- ------------------ client B | eth2-- ------------------ client C | eth3--

I have two internal networks 192.168.9.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 each connected to the internet and each connected as a VPN via tinc (device vpn). The gateways are 192.168.9.1 and 192.168.0.1 Attached to the 192.168.9.0/24 network is another network 172.16.1.0/24 via a gateway 192.168.0.1 <==> 172.16.1.1. On 192.168.0.1 gateway I have routes (route -n) like this: Kernel IP routing table

Hello, I am using samba 2.0.4b on Linux 2.0.36. Since I changed some of the parameters in my smb.conf I have a very strange Problem. Everytime my Samba-Box wins the browselist election process two nmbds are started and my WinXX-Clients do not get access to samba (I could see the server but not access the shares nor login to the domain). smbclient -L server from server works fine. From another

Hi all, I have been testing network throughput and latency and I was wondering if my measurements are as expected. For the test, I used Fedora 17 for both host and guest, using kernel 3.5.2-3.fc17.86_64. Pinging an external server on the LAN from the host, using a gigabit interface, the results are: # ping -c 10 172.16.1.1 PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

Hi all, I have been testing network throughput and latency and I was wondering if my measurements are as expected. For the test, I used Fedora 17 for both host and guest, using kernel 3.5.2-3.fc17.86_64. Pinging an external server on the LAN from the host, using a gigabit interface, the results are: # ping -c 10 172.16.1.1 PING 172.16.1.1 (172.16.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from

Problem: I have four networks, A, B, C, and D Networks B, C, and D should not be able to see each other. Network A should be able to see all of them. A - 172.16.1.1/24 B - 172.16.2.1/24 C - 172.16.3.1/24 D - 172.16.0.1/24 For host machine X, which is at 172.16.1.100/24 (network A), I added a route for it to ping a machine (Y) on the network B:     ip route add 172.16.2.0/24 via