similar to: Can only connect to Samba thru IP, not FQDN

Hello everyone, I have a FreeNAS server (9.10 running samba 4.3.11-GIT-UNKNOWN) that's recently started emitting this error: gss_accept_sec_context failed with [ Miscellaneous failure (see text): Failed to find cifs/nas01 at EXAMPLE.COM(kvno 4) in keytab MEMORY:cifs_srv_keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5)] I've looked at bug 12262 [1], which is why I've cc'd Stefan Metzmacher. I don't

The problem I have is a little strange and is due to the configuration of our Active Directory. The following symptoms occur with the following setup. I will provide more details on the setup later. Microsoft Windows 2012 DC domain controller (ad1.local) Microsoft Windows 2012 RODC read only domain controller (public.ad1.local) Ubuntu 12.04 with Samba 3.6.3 (mizb-nas01) The ubuntu/Samba server

On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 18/12/2019 14:34, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:13 AM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > > > Problem is, and as I said, Samba 4.3.x is EOL as far as Samba is >

On 12/22/2013 10:09 AM, Marco wrote: > On 2013–12–21 John Ferlan wrote: > >> On 12/17/2013 07:13 PM, Marco wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I'm new to libvirt and face problems connecting to an iSCSI target. >>> What I intend to do is to connect libvirt (I tried virt-manager and >>> virsh) to an iSCSI target and then boot from the LUNs which

On 2013–12–21 John Ferlan wrote: > On 12/17/2013 07:13 PM, Marco wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm new to libvirt and face problems connecting to an iSCSI target. > > What I intend to do is to connect libvirt (I tried virt-manager and > > virsh) to an iSCSI target and then boot from the LUNs which contain > > the VMs. > > > > I followed the

I'm sure this is a question asked many times before, but before I'm flamed, let me state that I've spent TWO WEEKS researching and testing this problem. I've read so many "How To's," forum postings, news groups, and "official docs," I should be an expert on Samba by now. It's obscene. I have an external USB drive - Western Digital 160GB USB 2.0 -

I'm sure this is a question asked many times before, but before I'm flamed, let me state that I've spent TWO WEEKS researching and testing this problem. I've read so many "How To's," forum postings, news groups, and "official docs," I should be an expert on Samba by now. It's obscene. I have an external USB drive - Western Digital 160GB USB 2.0 -

I'm sure this is a question asked many times before, but before I'm flamed, let me state that I've spent TWO WEEKS researching and testing this problem. I've read so many "How To's," forum postings, news groups, and "official docs," I should be an expert on Samba by now. It's obscene. I have an external USB drive - Western Digital 160GB USB 2.0 -

On 2013–12–23 John Ferlan wrote: > On 12/22/2013 10:09 AM, Marco wrote: > > On 2013–12–21 John Ferlan wrote: > > > >> On 12/17/2013 07:13 PM, Marco wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> > >>> I'm new to libvirt and face problems connecting to an iSCSI target. > >>> What I intend to do is to connect libvirt (I tried virt-manager and

Hi all, does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then used within the -d statement? Best Regards Marcus

I know that Shorewall is not for content control, but until such day that I get the time to set-up squid, what is the best way to prevent machines on LOC from reaching a bunch of sites contained in a list with about 30 to 40 IP addresses or FQDN entries ? The blacklist look only at the SRC field of the packet, right? Thanks, Costantino. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!?

Hi, I have an interesting issue. I?m running a redhat 9 box with samba 3.0.7, and Kerberos 1.3.1. I?ve joined the machine to the AD2k3 domain, and all the informational commands respond as expected, getent's, wbinfo ?g ?t, and net ads*** and also 'smbclient -k //otherdomainserver/share' works as it should from the server's terminal. when connecting to the server with a windows

Hello, can anyone give me some tips why the file size of various samba executables has been increased dramatically from 3.0.34 to 3.3.3 (e.g. smbd 3.5MB -> ~7MB) The reason is that it is necessary for our project to keep the size as small as possible. You can have a look into the makefile here:

Hi Gregory, I see few things, start here : from smb.conf remove : map to guest = Bad User This enabled on a domain member or other domain server is really a no go. This makes debugging really hard. interpret_string_addr_internal: getaddrinfo failed for name > freenas.ad.abc.local (flags 1026) [hostname nor servname > provided, or not known] Looks like there are resolving problems.

On 27/12/2019 17:06, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > On 18/12/2019 14:34, Jonathon Reinhart wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:13 AM Rowland penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at

Hi, I've tried to use SIPSAK to understand the troubles i'm having about sending my voice to the person I've called (extension), after doing this tests below I always got this error "error: this FQDN or IP is not valid: voicegw". This could cause problems (namely audio problems)? Best regards, Helder voicegw:~# sipsak -C empty -a password -s

Hi I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own source name (examples below). These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected loop. Any ideas on how to debug this? Samba version is 4.1.18. FreeNAS box on network A " Jan 5

On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:55:08 +0100 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Please, does somebody have a clue, what goes wrong here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, haven't got a clue ;-) > Not? Rowland not? really.. ;-) Well okay, I could take a guess, but I could be wide

I have a Debian woody running Samba 3.0.2a in ads security mode as member of a Windows 2003 Active Directory, I run winbind+pam, wbinfo e net ads testjoin, its all working fine. >From any workstation, or even from the W2003 domain controller itself, I can?t access the samba server as \\linuxnetbiosname <file:///\\linuxnetbiosname> , as \\machine_ip_address

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 11:48:32PM +0100, Torkil Svensgaard wrote: > Hi > > I have a bunch of FreeNAS servers and a TrueNAS HA server all > spamming the logs with these messages every minute about their own > source name (examples below). > > These boxes are on two physically separate networks, and I find it > unlikely both networks should have some sort of undetected