similar to: 'inherit owner' doesn't play nice with 'force directory mode'

Hello list The Samba Howto Collection repeatedly asserts that by setting the sticky bit on directories any files created in those directories will be created with the owner set to that of the directory (for example, see http://samba.mirror.ac.uk/samba/docs/man/howto/AccessControls.html#id2541262). This has never worked for me. Files created inherit the group of the directory, but not the owner.

We need to give a user in another domain access to our printer: our domain: OURDOM (samba) other domain: OTHERDOM (AD?) user's workstation: \\OTHERDOM\WKSTN, in other domain printer: in our domain user: JOEBLOW - an account in each domain with the same login/password We're getting this error in wkstn.log: [2003/05/28 20:44:20, 1] smbd/password.c:server_validate(1101) password

I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: [myshare] path = /srv/myshare browseable = no public = no guest ok = no writable = yes printable = no create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no I have configured the following ACLs on

Hello,   I have a samba server v4.6.5, it’s a member of a Windows 2003 domain.   I setup a share, in this share I want to set sgid bit on directories. I created a directory with SGID bit on the top of the share, but when I create inside new directories didn’t have SGID bits.   Here is my smb.conf :   [global] use sendfile = no gpfs:getrealfilename = no smb ports = 445 139 dos charset =

Hi I set up a samba 4.1.4 server on the latest FreeBSD RELEASE 10. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to consider the option force group. After hours ofresearch I couldn't figure out what I'm still missing. unix extensions is set to no. Setting the debug level up to 10 also didn't help ;( Is this a bug or is there simply a mistake in my setup? When *valid users = @Groupname* is

Hello, I notice if I simply comment out a share or remove entirely. I receive errors such as theses. Is there a proper protocol to follow when removing a share? process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/myshare failed. No such file or directory ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4366(process_usershare_file) process_usershare_file: stat of /var/lib/samba/usershares/myshare failed.

After struggling with my smb.conf for a while, I feel I am missing something fundamental about how 'create mask' and 'force create mode' work. I have a dropbox-style share (which is working), which uses 'security = share', and I would like to specify certain permissions on files created in this share. In both of the below examples, files always get created with 744

Hi. I am having problems accessing subdirectories on a samba share. I am using windows 10 build 10586 and linux kernel 4.1.15-gentoo and samba 4.2.7. I have two shares, one called audio and the other called myshare. I cannot access the subdirectories in the myshare share. Here are the definitions. [myshare] comment = root directory path = / #fake oplocks = yes writable = yes printable =

Hi there, I have been googling all morning, and have thus far not come up with a solution... Server: CentOS release 5.5 (Final) samba-common-3.0.33-3.28.el5 samba-3.0.33-3.28.el5 samba-client-3.0.33-3.28.el5 Client: OS X 10.6.3 (Build 10D578) All patches are applied. SMB CONF: # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] workgroup = WRKGRP netbios name = Boleo server string = (%L) wins support = Yes

Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 29/12/15 13:59, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Hi. I am having problems accessing subdirectories on a samba share. I > > am using windows 10 build 10586 and linux kernel 4.1.15-gentoo and samba > > 4.2.7. I have two shares, one called audio and the other called > > myshare. I cannot access the subdirectories

Hello, I've been setting up new file server using samba 4.8.3 (centos 7 RPM), as samba 4 AD member server using my earlier smb.conf when I realised that I was  previously somewhat circumventing the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege by using "admin users map" to SAMDOM\Domain admins" parameter in smb.conf. I decided to change my smb.conf and setup shares following samba wiki. All

I'm configuring a standalone server(server role = standalone server) using POSIX ACLs to manage permissions on server. I need to manage permissions(At least basic ones, like read, write) from Windows GUI. Is that possible using standalone? When I try setting permissions on Windows I got this on the log: [2017/10/04 19:07:08.437837, 2] ../source3/smbd/posix_acls.c:3006(set_canon_ace_list)

Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 29/12/15 15:44, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: > > Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > >> On 29/12/15 13:59, covici at ccs.covici.com wrote: > >>> Hi. I am having problems accessing subdirectories on a samba share. I > >>> am using windows 10 build 10586 and linux kernel

Hi Rowland, do you maybe have any idea what could potentially cause this bug? smbclient thrwos me back a mount error(5): Input/output error when I try to mount the remote smbFS. It doesn't happen with my MacOSx and Windows 7 as client but it happens with Linux OSs and with a Konica Minolta copy machine with a scanner to samba function. The first try to mount fails with the above error.

Hi, Is anyone here using smb:// URLs to access "Windows" shares? I've been doing this for a while with common file systems at work, and it used to work just fine. Then I while back, I started getting issues; I will now just keep getting asked for a password when I try to access something through smb://. I thought at first that this meant there had been some kind of change

On 25/10/2024 14:03, Havany via samba wrote: > Did you try 133 mask instead of 0133 ? > > We use to disable acl for this kind of share and do something like that : > > [share] > path = /a/share/path > create mask = 133 > directory mask = 022 > valid users = @agroup > write list = @sagroup > force group = @agroup > nt acl support = No Still no go: It's rwx

Hello, I have samba configured with the following smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = mydomain netbios name = servername security = domain printcap name = cups disable spoolss = yes show add printer wizard = no idmap uid = 15000-20000 idmap gid = 15000-20000 winbind use default domain = yes use sendfile = yes printing = cups [myshare] comment = My new share path = /export/myshare valid users =

I have a home network based on Win XP Pro, with one Linux machine running Red Hat 9. All updates have been applied. There's no domain controller. I can connect from the Linux machine to the XP machines via Konqueror using smb://mymachine/myshare However, I can't use the mount command. I'm trying to use syntax like mount -t smbfs -o username=myname,password=mypwd //192.168.0.1

Hello At home, I use my Windows client host without entering a password, and would like to access a local Linux host likewise, ie. without being prompted for login/password while still having read/write access. Is this possible? Currently, I created no Unix/Samba accounts for the Windows user, and the following smb.conf only works in read-only mode (ie. I get an error when trying to write):

I?m facing some troubles with file / directory permissions... I log on the domain as admin user(root), and theres a pub share, on witch everyone needs to have permission to create / modify files, but when I change or create a file, only root can change the file, no one else. And then i need to go to server to chgrp users * -R and chown nobody * -R to allow others users to change the file.