similar to: Can't open shares using netbios names

On Fri, 14 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > https://forum.synology.com/enu/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=73960&hilit=ups+slave  > > I have the latest version of the Windows port of NUT (A UPS management package) installed on my Windows 7 machine. The UPS I am using is a > very old APC BK650M which is controlled and sends its status via a special serial cable to the Windows

Roger, I just ran a manual test, killing power and see what happens.  I set the Synology “Time before DiskStation goes into Safe mode” to 5 minutes so I didn’t have to wait like an hour until it powered down.  Here is the log: https://hastebin.com/ovuwilufeb.sql Everything appeared to be normal; the servers powered off and the Synology went into safe mode.  Power was then cut to the Synology

>> I am running NUT on a Synology NAS with attached a USB APC UPS. > > Do you have upsd and upsmon running as daemons on the Synology DSM? > Yes I have them both running on the Synology DSM: root 7236 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:16 /usr/sbin/upsd root 7741 1 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/upsmon root 7744 7741 0 Jun01 ? 00:00:12

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Alex Chekholko <alex at calicolabs.com> wrote: > In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux > box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. > Not sure if this would be the first attempt. Synology seems to bundle glusterfs in some form [1]. Regards, Vijay [1]

> Since it's NUT in the NAS which is deciding to order the shutdown, it would be > useful to see upsmon.conf, upssched.conf and upssched-cmd (or whatever Synology > use if anything) from the NAS to see what criteria they use. upsmon.conf (on Synology): RUN_AS_USER root MONITOR ups at localhost 1 monuser secret master MINSUPPLIES 1 SHUTDOWNCMD "" NOTIFYCMD /usr/sbin/upssched

Larry, I have not edited a single file, including anything to do with NUT, on the Synology via ssh.... ever. How is yours configured in the UI? Do you have it set to go into safe mode after a certain number minutes? Earlier, I was just copying and pasting the contents of some files to Roger but did not change anything. -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 14, 2020, 8:16 AM -0400,

I have had many discussions with Synology about this and other attitudes they have been displaying in the last few years. Also if you log into their NAS, using ssh and take a look at some of the comments that have been added into the "ETC" configs, it makes it very clear. They have also been removing any posts relating to methods or help given in the forums that relate to SAMBA ,

On 20/06/2023 18:30, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > to be clear, I'm completely your opinion. > > They had a running 4.15.9(-0619, their own build number), which was a > Beta, and the released version (-0632) didn't worked. So for me it's > obvious, too. > > I can bring the released version to run with a library from their beta >

On 20/06/2023 14:11, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi All, > > the Synology support is claiming this bug is the reason for the access > problems via hostname (Kerberos): > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14213 > > These log entries in log.wb-ADNAME are given as evidence: > > ../../source3/winbindd/winbindd_msrpc.c:307: [2023/06/14 > 22:13:42.913399,

I have the latest version of the Windows port of NUT installed on my Windows?7?machine. The UPS is connected via serial cable to the Windows machine. I also have my Synology NAS (which uses NUT) connected over the local network as a slave to the Windows NUT master. The Synology slave is configured to immediately go into "safe mode" whenever an FSD or OB+LB indication is received from the

Hi Rowland, to be clear, I'm completely your opinion. They had a running 4.15.9(-0619, their own build number), which was a Beta, and the released version (-0632) didn't worked. So for me it's obvious, too. I can bring the released version to run with a library from their beta version: libidmap-samba4.so. The reason for this as they wrote: "A key difference between SMB

Hi, Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology since that is what they are already using and some of the nice out-of-the-box admin features. From what I can tell Synology runs a custom linux flavor so it should be possible to compile gluster on it. Any first hand experience with it? Thanks, Ben

How would I capture with Wireshark when it seemingly happens at random?  Whenever I test, everything appears to work normally.  I wish I could somehow replicate it.  Maybe I need to test manually and see if it’ll happen in front of me; I’ve never actually seen it happen… always happens when I’m away. -- Todd Benivegna // todd at benivegna.com On Aug 2, 2020, 12:12 PM -0400, Manuel Wolfshant

Hi All, the Synology support is claiming this bug is the reason for the access problems via hostname (Kerberos): https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14213 These log entries in log.wb-ADNAME are given as evidence: ../../source3/winbindd/winbindd_msrpc.c:307: [2023/06/14 22:13:42.913399, winbind 3, pid=10150] msrpc_sid_to_name msrpc_sid_to_name: S-1-18-1 f?r Dom?ne ADNAME

In theory, you can run GlusterFS on a Synology box, as it is "just a Linux box". In practice, you might be the first person to ever try it. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Ben Mabey <ben.mabey at recursionpharma.com> wrote: > Hi, > Does anyone have any experience of using Synology NAS servers as bricks in > a gluster setup? The ops team at my work prefers Synology

On 9/19/2017 6:45 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Ren? Berber wrote: >> My guess is that they are the same version (Synology keeps it updated). > > Is there a way to check which version they are using? (Just curious - probably will not affect the problem you described.) None I could find, tried strings, might try telnet but my guess is that it will spew

I'm hoping that someone can shed some light on this… I have a Synology NAS (DS416) that has a feature where you can enable a “Network UPS Server” which is a NUT server.  I have been trying to get the Synology to shut down three Ubuntu 20.04 servers that I have. While it does work when I test it out manually, sometimes when I am away and the power goes out briefly, the servers shut down when

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Todd Benivegna wrote: > APC Back-UPS NS 650M1 UPS ---USB---> Synology NAS (DS416 - Master?) > ---Ethernet---> Netgear Managed Switch w/ uplink to router <---Ethernet--- > Servers (Ubuntu 20.04 - Plex, Pulsar, Proton - All three set as slaves) I'm guessing that the UPS supplies only the NAS, not the 3 Ubuntu machines. Do they have their own UPS's?

Hi Travis, I know, but this is now the released version (4.15.9-0919 beta > 4.15.9-0631), see the history page for SMB-Service: https://www.synology.com/en-us/releaseNote/SMBService?model=DS918%2B#7_x_series With the beta version it still works. But we can't stay on the beta forever I think. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Travis Wenks via samba schrieb am 13.04.2023 um 21:29:

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > >>such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > >>running on the Synology ? > > >