similar to: Reverse Veto Files - let's try again!

Dear Samba Team, As I need to use Reverse veto File function .Please let me know how I grant the permission for to write / create specific file types on samba shares and rest of types need to be deny Thank you, Chathura This E-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally

Im currently having a very long list of veto files, just to be sure that the people ONLY can write documents and styleshets. Is there any plan to have a "reverse veto files" to ONLY allow this type of file? Because when I have a lot of veto files the samba gets too slow, even if it dosen't use regex, with regex i would be able to do the reverse veto. But without regex and without

Hello all, I'm trying to hide files beginning with a underscore ( "_" ) and hidden files from my samba share's so i added this to my smb.conf: veto files = /_*/.*/ The section with the dot works, but the one with the underscore doesn't. I also tried /\_*/.*/ but this has the same result. Any ideas how to hide the files beginning with a underscore? Thanks, Evas

Hi, I am running the latest Samba (p8) on Solaris 2.6. The PC clients are running win95 OSR2. I am using encrypted passwords. I have some files vetoed: veto files = /.rssrc/.desktop/ I'm not using 'hide dot files'. If I have a folder with one file in, and that file is a vetoed file, I cannot delete the folder. I have unix permissions to delete both. The windows error message is:

Hi! I want to enforce on a samba share, that every file needs to contain a version. like: foobar-02.doc or blah-01.xls I thought something like veto files = /^.*\D\D\.(doc|xls|ppt)$/ would to it. But it ignores that. are there any other options?

Hi, there I have a question about Veto files in smb.conf: Can we use this option to hidden files not belonging to myself in a shared folder? If not, how do we implement this functionality in Samba? Thanks, Allen

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > Hi, > > This is an early warning: OpenSSH will drop tcpwrappers in the next > release. sshd_config has supported the Match keyword for a long time > and it is possible to express more useful conditions (e.g. matching > by user and address) than tcpwrappers allowed. > > Removing it reduces the

linux 2.2.19/rh6x I use in a share veto files = /.*/ whenever you connect to it the client process hangs, the smbd starts consuming cpu time and cannot be killed but with "kill -9". This is the last part of the smbd log [2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(319) 3 user groups: 100 6 19 [2002/05/16 05:49:51, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2findfirst(863)

Hi. I have a fileserver running samba 2.2.7 and netatalk 1.5.5 for old mac clients. Because the mac's are quite spammy with creating .AppleDouble and other system directories, I've added the following to smb.conf: veto files = /.AppleDesktop/.AppleDouble/Network Trash Folder/TheFindByC ontentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/System Volume Information/Recycled/ Now, when a windows client

Hi all.. I'm update my samba, from 2.2.8a to 3.0.2a, and now my 'veto oplock files' do no work... I set my option like this: veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/ but after the first user open our software (that opens a file .mdb in a samba share) the second user can't open... he gets the error message: 'Couln't lock the file' Even setting all locking options = no, the

Hi list. I'm having a big problem: I have a Samba Server that has a share where all my users can read any information. I have now a new situation, I have to configure this share to allow some users to write a xml file. It's like the opposite of the Veto Files options. Is there way that I can configure my share to let this happen? Thanks a lot, Diego.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I'm using Samba 3 on a Debian 5.0 (Lenny), the package is version 3.4.7 (from Debian backports, the full version 2:3.4.7~dfsg-2~bpo50+2). We use some 'veto files' on our shares to avoid users to have multimedia files (movies, mp3 and so on). Now we have a true demand to allow certain users to store corporate videos (about our

Anyone know anything about it? I found a list with all the extensions used by Ransomware at the moment, but they are almost 800 and with that amount I think I will have problems using the veto files, as well as the red tape of updating them. Please, if anyone knows anything about it, please share. ᐧ 2017-03-15 23:51 GMT-03:00 Tácio Andrade <tacioandrade at gmail.com>: > Good night.

Hi I have many shares on my Samba 4 file server and I would like to restrict a long list of files to most of these shares. Is it possible to specify the prohibited files in the global section of smb.conf and apply them to most shares, except for a few? Regards, M?rcio Bacci

How can I *veto* dot files? The naive approach of using /.*/ fails in so far as no file at all appears on the NT side :-) Hiding isn't enough for me, as I do want to see all hidden files on the NT side of things - I just don't want to see the Linux dot files on the NT side. This is Samba 2.0.6 (RH6.2) with the below configuration. TIA, Stefan ************ # Samba config file

I've been playing around a little bit with the "veto files" option for the [homes] shares we have on our Samba servers (2.2.1a & 2.2.3a). I've discovered that: veto files = /.*/ works marvelously for not letting the users muck with their .dotfiles, which is exactly what we want, however, I've also discovered that it also clobbers the special directory entries

Hi ! I would like to remove from listing the "Icon?" files created by mac user when they customize their folder icon. So I did in my smb.conf : veto files = /Icon?/ ok it's working, but "Icone" "Iconx" "Icons" will be removed too. I tried veto files = /Icon\?/ but it's not working, Is there a way to use question mark (?) but not as a wild-card ?

While working on my existing member file server smb.conf config file I found an entry for "veto files" like the following: veto files = /.bash_logout/.bash_profile/.bash_history/.bashrc/ The "man smb.conf" entry says: veto files (S) This is a list of files and directories that are neither visible nor accessible. Each entry in the list must be

Good night. I am behind a way so that in my backup share it is possible to only write files in the format of the application that I use to execute the backup routines, for this I searched the internet for a solution that works like Allow Files, however it is Complicated to find. Talking on forums a user informed me that he could use the parameter to follow in smb.conf, however in my tests it did

We're getting very close now to having our RH6.1 server as we want it. Just a few anoying things left to iron out so we can trial it properly prior to going live. One of them is the "veto files" option in smb.conf. We want to stop users on Win95 clients from seeing (or deleting) the dot-files in their home shares. I've tried the above option, I've tried "hide dot