similar to: Samba4. Provision script fails.

I'm trying to setup samba4 alpha 8 as a domain controller on fedora core 10. The compile and install seems to have gone well, but the provision step is failing: ?./setup/provision --realm=peap.local --domain=peap.local --server-role='domain controller' Setting up secrets.ldb Setting up the registry Setting up templates db Setting up idmap db schema_fsmo_init: no schema

Hello Matthieu, >Did you wait for a couple of minutes (1 or 2 hours maybe) for the sync >to settle ? also did you transfer roles to the samba4 DC ? > >In anycase you should restart samba with a higher log level so that we >can have more information. > >If needed pop up in #samba-technical for more real time support. > >Matthieu. I've restarted samba with log level

Good day. I have a problem with connecting Samba 3.5.5 and Windows 7. First of all I have added DomainCompatibilityMode and DNSNameResolutionRequired to windows registry. After that i tried to connect windows to samba domain, but without any results. And some time ago I see, that I can't access Samba shares with right login and password. Windows 7 diagnostik says that It can't find

I setup a samba4 pdc and successfully added a Windows 2008 machine to the domain. When I start up the "Active Directory Users and Computers" tool, I get a "Naming information cannot be located because: directory property cannot be found in the cache" error. I'm running a pretty up to date version of samba4. The head commit is: commit

Hey All, I am trying to setup a samba4 environment with OpenLDAP backend on a Debian 5 server by using the following howto: http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/OpenLDAP Everything goes well but when I come at the point of provisioning I get the following output and the provisioning stops. Failed to bind - LDAP client internal error: NT_STATUS_UNEXPECTED_NETWORK_ERROR Failed to

Hi! I'm currently trying to do partitions upgrade. But provision script stops on error. im getting following situation: ----- Setting up secrets.ldb Setting up the registry Setting up the privileges database Setting up idmap db Setting up SAM db Setting up sam.ldb partitions and settings Setting up sam.ldb rootDSE Pre-loading the Samba 4 and AD schema naming_fsmo_init: no partitions dn

I was trying to follow howto at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/OpenLDAP with today's source (15 february 2010) (latest commit: 6ec6fa0ac4e71f9b14a3cbfef328d50e321b0544) ./configure --enable-developer worked as well as make && make install. Provision fails: ./setup/provision --realm=unimore.it --ldapadminpass=atmlite --ldap-backend-type=openldap

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All, I'm trying to get samba4 to provision with the latest git version. My provision command looks like so: # ./setup/provision --realm=TEST.DOMAIN --domain=DOMAIN --adminpass=pass - --server-role='domain controller' --ldap-backend-type=openldap - --slapd-path=/usr/sbin/slapd I get the following output from the command: hdb_db_open:

Following the instructions here ( http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/LDAP_Backend/Fedora_DS_1.2.3), I got to the DS provisioning step and encountered an error trying to provision the 389-DS (v1.2.3 B2009.280.1622). The source was checked out around 12/30/2009 ~16:00 GMT following the instructions provided in the 'howto'. I have made sure that system.domain-test.local is listed in the

After accidentally destroying my primary DC which held all of the FSMO roles, I am unable to show any roles, or sieze the naming role. I initialy tried to sieze --role=all, and it failed, but by doing them individually I was able to seize them all except for the naming role. Any suggestions on how to fix this? # samba-tool fsmo show -d 9 <removed generic debug info> pm_process()

James, I configured the account lockout policies by RSAT, GPEDIT.MSC. By GPEDIT.MSC I set the value = 10 attempts. Through the samba-tool, I used this command: # samba-tool domain passwordsettings set --account-lockout-threshold=11 INFO: Current debug levels: ... pm_process() returned Yes Module 'tombstone_reanimate' is disabled. Skip registration.lpcfg_servicenumber:

Hello there. I'm try to configure squid3 with samba4-alpha-10 autentication. My samba4 pdc work fine with a simple smb.conf: [globals] netbios name = PANTRO workgroup = MYDOMAIN realm = MYDOMAIN.LAN server role = domain controller [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/mydomain.lan/scripts read only = no

Hi, We were using samba_backup from 4.4.5 and after upgrade to 4.10.5 we are trying to configure new method, but is not working, tried: offline with samba stopped: # samba-tool domain backup offline --targetdir=/local/test/ INFO: Current debug levels: all: 5 tdb: 5 printdrivers: 5 lanman: 5 smb: 5 rpc_parse: 5 rpc_srv: 5 rpc_cli: 5 passdb: 5 sam: 5 auth: 5 winbind: 5

Hello, when I run > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names -d10 it gives me the following output: > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 10 > tdb: 10 > printdrivers: 10 > lanman: 10 > smb: 10 > rpc_parse: 10 > rpc_srv: 10 > rpc_cli: 10 > passdb: 10 > sam: 10 > auth: 10 > winbind: 10 > vfs: 10 > idmap: 10 > quota: 10

Hello! I've got this error dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. Already tried the step described here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Dns_tkey_negotiategss:_TKEY_is_unacceptable But when trying to delete the account used the

On 30/12/15 18:19, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Hello! > I've got this error > dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable > > when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose > > With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines > that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. > > Already tried the step described here > >

On 30/12/15 18:19, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: > Hello! > I've got this error > dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable > > when running samba_dnsupdate --verbose > > With this error dynamic entries stopped working as Type A machines > that entered in the field or entry to a new DC. > > Already tried the step described here > >

Two files are hosting DNS data: /path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb and /path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb DNS entries are sometimes (often? always?) base64 encoded. You should be able to "grep" for string these files with: ldbsearch --show-binary -H /path/to/private/sam.ldb.d/DC=FORESTDNSZONES,DC=blabla.ldb | grep "what you want"

I am fairly sure Samba will ignore GP password policies, but if you set the policies with the samba tool command, then it should adhere to it, unless you are running across the bug I mentioned. You would see multiple badPwdCount increases for one bad password in the logs if you are experiencing that bug. -James Crouch On Aug 19, 2016 2:26 PM, "Ricardo Pardim Claus" <ricardo.claus at

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:03:37 -0500 Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org> wrote: > Quoting Adam Tauno Williams via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > Quoting Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >>> samba-tool's dbcheck finds only two errors in cn=Configuration, > >>> but it does not repair them.  These appear to