similar to: My Documents: Music shows, Pictures not so much

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "My Documents: Music shows, Pictures not so much"

2009 Mar 27
2
Samba/LDAP Backend: Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED
When I run this command I am not prompted for a password, I just get the below error. # smbclient -U root //zmail/homes Error connecting to 10.0.0.14 (Connection refused) Connection to zmail failed (Error NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED) --- Now for the back story: CentOS v5.2 with Samba v3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 and Zimbra 5.0.11_GA on x86_64 hardware. I'm attempting to connect samba (PDC) with
2005 May 13
2
losing access to profile when user becomes domain user instead domain admin
Hi, I am in the process of migrating our windows workstations to a samba domain. Here is the problem: When creating the domain user I put every user additionalyy in the domain admin group so that he/she can copy his old files on the local profile to his new domain account. Then after this is done I put them to the domain users group but some (!) of the user the lose then access to the
2005 Nov 24
1
Group mapping: different SIDs
Hi, I have the following situation concerning group mapping: when I enter > net getlocalsid I get > SID for domain PDC is: S-1-5-21-4166838278-3756557259-2095403906 when I enter > net getlocalsid DOMAIN I get >SID for domain DOMAIN is: S-1-5-21-2018781741-1218799122-1862565094 The group mapping shows > net groupmap list > Domain Users
2005 Nov 21
1
does a pdc need to be in the domain itself?
Hello List, we have installed samba Version 3.0.20-0.1-SUSE. when I'm entering > net getlocalsid I get > SID for domain <netbios name> is: S-1-5-21-4166838278-3756557259-2095403906 entering > net getlocalsid <domain name> returns > SID for domain <domain name> is: S-1-5-21-2018781741-1218799122-1862565094 Does this mean that the pdc itself is not in the domain
2009 May 01
2
Automating the Samba Install
Hey all, I'm coloring outside the lines a little bit here but I would like to automate the install of a samba pdc. Within that script to install I would like to assign rights to a group. Here is an example of a few steps: # Create Unix group: groupadd domadmins # Map unix group to samba groups: net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmins rid=512 type=d # Assign
2011 Jun 09
3
DFS root only works for more recent Windows clients
I've been testing DFS roots and I'm finding that while Vista and 2008 Server clients can connect with no problems, Windows XP Pro and 2003 Server clients fail. This seems like it's the wrong way round - Samba usually has more difficulties with recent Windows versions than older ones - but I can only assume that there's some registry/policy change between the versions. If anybody
2011 Jun 02
5
Samba vs Linux file permissions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I cannot find anything in the documentation or mailing list that addresses this oddity. I've installed Samba Version 3.4.7 on Ubuntu Server 10.04, and I'm utterly confused by samba's behavior regarding permissions. Users on the server have home directories in /home/chemgroup/username. (chemgroup is actually a symlink to another
2004 Sep 08
4
machine account with w2k
Dear Samba Friends, I've a problem to join with Windows2000-Clients a Samba-PDC. When I join the samba-pdc with a WinNT4.0-Client it is no problem, first I create a machine-account for the machine: 1. in /etc/group exists the group: machines:x:515: 2. useradd -g machines -d /dev/null -c nickname -s /bin/false neuch205$ 3. pdbedit -a -m -u neuch205 In this way, it isn't a problem to join
2009 Nov 15
2
Segmentation faults on SEXP conversion
Hello - I am making a first attempt at writing a simple C++ routine to print out R objects (this is a simple proof-of-concept as part of a larger package development). The relevant C++ routine is as follows: void Rwrite(SEXP fd, SEXP msg) { int *ofd = INTEGER(fd); const char * omsg = CHAR(asChar(msg)); printf("[%i] %s",*ofd,omsg); } And the corresponding interface in R is as
2012 Sep 04
2
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: > This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael > Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think > if you change it to > %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr > %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> > %18 = bitcast <4 x i32> %17 to i128 > %19 = icmp ne i128 %18, 0
2012 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Am 05.09.2012 00:24, schrieb Stephen: > Roland Scheidegger <sroland <at> vmware.com> writes: >> This looks quite similar to something I filed a bug on (12312). Michael >> Liao submitted fixes for this, so I think >> if you change it to >> %16 = fcmp ogt <4 x float> %15, %cr >> %17 = sext <4 x i1> %16 to <4 x i32> >> %18 =
2012 Sep 03
3
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
> > which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would use > > for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? > > I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal > operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together. The code > generators do try to recognize a few idioms and
2009 Sep 18
1
Verification on HOW adding a machines works
I'm straddling the half-way point between samba and ldap. When adding a machine to the domain, functionally, it works like you would expect. You enter in the domain, enter your credentials, and reboot. The computer is able to function as a machine on the domain. I'm using the smbldap-tools as suggested in the wiki. Here's the script: add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd
2013 Jun 07
1
Folder permissions not working
I seem to be having a bit of a brain fade with regard to permissions in samba. I have a share with several folders owned by different groups: drwxrws--- 13 root accounts 4.0K Jun 7 12:12 Accounts drwxrws--- 16 ian accounts 4.0K Jun 7 11:24 Administration drwxrws--- 14 accounts users 4.0K Apr 22 12:05 Downloads drwxrwsr-x 7 ian users 4.0K Mar 22 13:51
2012 Sep 04
0
[LLVMdev] branch on vector compare?
Am 04.09.2012 00:08, schrieb Stephen: >>> which goes through memory. Is there some idiom I'm missing so that it would > use >>> for instance movmsk for SSE or vcmpgt & cr6 for altivec? >> >> I don't think you are missing anything: LLVM IR has no support for horizontal >> operations like or'ing the elements of a vector of boolean together.
2024 Feb 08
12
[Bug 3666] New: sshd crash
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3666 Bug ID: 3666 Summary: sshd crash Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter:
2019 Apr 01
5
selftest
Thanks for the reply, Besides the problem with source4/lib/messaging/messaging_handlers.c, Good to hear that selftest is actively used, then do I understand it right that 'make test' should succeed? My bigger problem is that it failed with lots of errors. This must be a problem with my build, then, but since this is a fresh tarball I am a bit puzzled. I would appreciate some hint on
2008 Nov 05
1
Samba 3.2.4 not locking accounts?
Hello guys! I'm using samba 3.2.4 (binaries from samba.org) on SLES9+sp3. I am building a PDC with LDAP support (i am attaching my config files), I'm also using ldapsam:trusted and ldapsam:editposix. Although I am setting the account lock after 3 failed tries in usrmgr, and verified that the parameters are actually set in the LDAP, no locking occurs. I started thinking that it was my
2003 Nov 14
1
net group question
I groupapped the domadmins group in linux to ntgroup="Domain Admins" but instead of mapping to the SID number ending in 512 it's creating a new SID number endind in 2025 mapped to domadmins... Does anybody knows why??? It worked in the previous server. This is the command I execute net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmin If I use the rid=512 option I
2008 Apr 29
2
samba windows domain controller
Hi I want windows machines to automatically be added into samba when they try to attach to the domain. Had various problems with root account not being accepted. Can anyone spot anything glaringly obviously wrong in my config that follows. Cheers [global] name resolve order = wins bcast hosts ldap ssl = no passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Retype*new*password*