similar to: domain admin cannot admin pc

Hi, Using Samba 3.0.14a and AIX 4.3, I have been able to join PC's to the domain without any problem. It "just works". I am using local profiles, and serving login batch files from the server, and that "just works". So far, I'm a happy camper. Now, I am trying to understand permissions so that I can actually use the "moveuser.exe" command from the

The Wiki page you pointed to describes a modification to the *Default Domain Policy*. This is probably why you never met the issue I described. As I reported on my previous post, the Default Domain Policy was the only one that kept working after the Microsoft update. All the other GPOs that I had set stopped being applied.

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:10:03 -0400 Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have > > >

We have bumped into a most odd problem. Server: Debian Etch and their Samba 3.0.24-2 Client: WinXP SP2, MSI v3, all hot fixes The following settings are in place on the server: #!/bin/bash # # initGrps.sh # Map Windows Domain Groups to UNIX groups net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadmin rid=512 type=d net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Users"

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:08:53 +0100 Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 20:10:03 -0400 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > > > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>

Considering the following page... http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/guide/small.html First of, my compliments to John for some great examples to study. In my mind I see three levels of security: 1) Linux - such as SSH'ing into the Linux server, Linux accounts and groups come into play here 2) Samba PDC - "Domain Admins" "Domain Users" come into play here. Examples

Greetings, I'm running Samba on a Debian stable server and have run into a problem I can't seem to get past. It's version 3.2.5. The basic setup is that it authenticates users via 'security = ads' and controls access to individual shares using local groups via 'valid users = @localgroup'. All of the users have accounts in /etc/password and are added to the groups in

Hello, I am a Samba-newbie, so please excuse, if my question seems to you stupid. I've set up a PDC, based on Samba 3.0.14a (SerNet) and a OpenLDAP-Server. So I took a Windows XP client and integrated it to the domain. Afterwards I logged in as administrator and copied the existing profile of an user to the server. The user was able to login and his profile was loaded from the server. But I

I'm having trouble getting myself in to the administrators group. I'm using samba as a domain controller. I have a samba account called administrator. I have these settings in my smb.conf:: domain group map = /etc/samba/groups.mapping domain user map = /etc/samba/domainuser.mapping local group map = /etc/samba/localgroup.mapping This is in my domainuser.mapping to alias the

Hai Mark, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Mark > Foley via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 15 juni 2018 17:29 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Admin UID changed with upgrade to 4.8.2 > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:08:53 +0100 Rowland Penny > <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > >

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52

> Normally a group cannot 'own' files etc, Unix uses ugo permissions and > when you chown a file you would use something like this: > > chown foo:somegroup somefile > > this would make 'foo' the owner of the file and possibly allow > 'somegroup' access to it, this would depend on whatever permissions you > set with 'chmod' > > So,

samba-tool group addmembers domaingroup 'SAMDOM\user1' ERROR(exception): Failed to add members "SAMDOM\user1" to group "domaingroup" - Unable to find "SAMDOM\user1". Operation cancelled. samba-tool group addmembers 'SAMDOM\domaingroup' 'SAMDOM\user1' ERROR(exception): Failed to add members "SAMDOM\user1" to group

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 21:37:58 +0100 Rowland Penny wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 16:03:35 -0400 > Mark Foley via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Nevertheless, 'ls' does give names though I don't seem to have either > > libnss-winbind or libpam-winbind files on my AD/DC. > > I keep forgetting that you use slackware, I suppose it uses

> > Two things Louis: > > if you look very closely at the differences in the 'ERROR' message, you > will find the only difference is this: > > O:LAG:DAD:PAR( > > against the expected: > > O:DAG:DAD:PAR( > > The returned ACL is owned by the 'Local Admins', but it should be owned > by 'Domain Admins'. As far as I can see,

Hi Samba4 DC and win 7 clients. The user profiles are stored in a profiles share: [profiles] path = /home/CACTUS/profiles read only = No This works OK and the user can logon to different boxes with the same profile. The profile folders such as Desktop, Downloads etc. however, also appear stored on the local disk under c:\users\username. Any file saved e.g. on the Desktop, is not

I am about to install a new server running CentOS 5.4. The server will contain pretty critical data that we can't afford to corrupt. I would like to benefit from the extra speed and features of a ext4 filesystem but I don't have any experience with it. Is there some member of the list who can enlighten me on whether ext4 is mature enough to be used on a production server without too

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:08:36PM +0000, Miguel Medalha via samba wrote: > > > On 13-03-2018 19:22, Karolin Seeger via samba-technical wrote: > > ======================================================== > > "It is time that we all see gender as a > > spectrum instead of two sets of > > opposing ideals. We should stop > > defining each other

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 09:08:36PM +0000, Miguel Medalha via samba wrote: > > > On 13-03-2018 19:22, Karolin Seeger via samba-technical wrote: > > ======================================================== > > "It is time that we all see gender as a > > spectrum instead of two sets of > > opposing ideals. We should stop > > defining each other

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions