similar to: NFS mounted samba share

Hi, Whenever i sync certain files in ( like /etc/tnsnames.ora ) from our hostA to hostB, rsync always print out /etc/ it prints out the files modified. it does that for every directory name in the path of files i update... Is there a way to suppress that output, since it is not modifying that directory ? Thanks Daniel Bourque Unix Systems Administrator BTS Platform Services Learjet Inc.

After having migrated my machines and user to Samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu 16.04.1 (no domain upgrade, new provision, all accounts new defined) and old data copied over to the new machines, I have now a broader testbed and notice issues I didn't see prior to that. Having roaming profiles (defined in the user object in LDB)... Seemingly at random smbd keeps locks on NTUSER.DAT and ntuser.ini for a

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Hello, I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of errors logs: 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0] ../source3/smbd/oplock.c:338(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file myDomain.local/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Registry.pol --

I am running samba 4.5.1 on Ubuntu 16.04. The samba server is running as an AD DC and stores the user profiles, the clients are all windows 10 professional. One user reported being locked out of the profile pretty regularly. After investigating the case I saw that a lot of files in the profile are still locked even after logging out and shutting down the system. After restarting the samba server,

Of course, the sysvol is located on a windows controller from the forest. mount -t cifs -o username=domain_admin_user //windowsDC.myDomain.local/SYSVOL /mnt/smb/sysvol and copied the files with -R --preserve to /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/ Below logs are provided from /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd file. regards, On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at

Hello, I've a virtual machine working as a samba server ("clear linux release 28640", whose relevant information are in the attached file "server_clearmi_28640.txt"). The samba client is an android 4 virtual machine (https://www.android-x86.org/releases/releasenote-4-4-r5.html). I can succesfully mount samba shares from the android "terminal emulator", with the

Sorry, I have omitted to post the config file. # cat /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] workgroup = myDomain realm = myDomain.local netbios name = DCLINUX server role = active directory domain controller dsdb:schema update allowed = yes [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/rcs-rds.local/scripts read only = No [sysvol]

Hello. I just upgrade my kernel, smbd and changed my smb.conf. (4.14.12-1-Arch" to "4.14.19-1-lts") "samba 4.7.4-1" But now, "reload smbd" and "close-share" can not drop connected users to share. Because of that I have to restart smbd service for destroy a share right now. But it was working previous version and I don't know what is wrong right

Hello, We've been seeing a problem with Samba server 3.0.33-0.17 handling lock files for Microsoft Powerpoint 2007. The problem is observed in both Windows XP and Windows Vista. If a user opens an existing file, smbstatus looks like this: 10781 11021 DENY_WRITE 0x2019f RDWR NONE /usr/test/dssg test1234ecg2.pptx Fri Oct 23 17:21:52 2009 10517 11021

Hi everyone, I just reported the following issue: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24927 Using the Xcode 7 linker, one gets messages such as the following when linking objects generated using llvm: ld: warning: object file (foo.o) was built for newer OS X version (14.5) than being linked (10.9) The issue is the following: a) In lib/Support/Unix/Host.inc, sys::getDefaultTargetTriple()

Hello, Our samba fileserver is a member of a Windows 2008R2 domain, and has different shares. These shares are set with a "read only = yes" and have an explicit "write list". This works as planned. But when an "read only" user opens a pdf with Adobe acrobat, the file gets DenyMode DENY_WRITE and the user who can edit the file can't save the document anymore.

Here's the small scale version of the R script: http://pastebin.com/sEYKv2Vv Here's the file that I'm reading in: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n4487682/weatherData.txt weatherData.txt I apologize for the length of the data. I tried to cut it down to 12 lines, however, it wasn't reproducing the bad output that I wanted to show. The problem is that my whole data set

Hello! We indeed need debug level 10 logs of smbd. But I bet that you're running into an incompatibility between SMB and GPFS share modes. Those don't match 100%, so turning off gpfs:sharemodes might be worth a try. Of course, this means that you lose interop share modes. I'd be happy to analyze this further and assist you in making a proper GPFS query out of this if needed. With

On 18/03/15 13:17, Adriana Moga wrote: > Hello, > > I have manually mounted the SYSVOL share, sync it with samba and run > samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset. What do you mean 'manually mounted the SYSVOL share' ? how did you do this ? > But I'm not sure if all windows policies are acceptable by samba because of > errors logs: > > 2015/03/18 09:30:52.197934, 0]

Gabe Bourque wrote: > Hello Anton Tinchev, > > I'm writing to you in hopes you can answer a few questions regarding > Asterisk/Digium and it's reliability. I saw your posting in the > Asterisk mailing list (Re: [Asterisk-Users] Is Asterisk ready for "real" > use?) and decided to write directly to you. The reason being that you > are one of only a few

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:29:17PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >24.01.2023 20:22, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >>What Samba version is this? This: >> >>>LEASE() >> >>... looks broken: the handle oplock/lease state claims to be a >>lease, which means the client didn't request an oplock but a lease >>which should not have happened in

I noticed one of my smbd processes for one particular client (IUSR_JUNIPER) is taking 200MB in memory, far different from all the other smbd processes. Should I be concerned about a memory leak here? I don't think samba would be caching any files, so I can't see why it'd use this much memory. That windows client is a win2k IIS5 server, with well over 60 sites that are hosted off a

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

Hi I have problems with Samba and hope some of you can help me. Below if I have add the error messages that are relevant. [root at roskilde mosek]# emacs /var/log/samba/log.172.16.0.108 File Edit Options Buffers Tools Help [2014/02/06 10:18:29.562405, 0] smbd/oplock.c:330(oplock_timeout_handler) Oplock break failed for file windows/intel/Composer-XE-2013.198/Documentation/csupport.txt --