similar to: Samba Panic

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "Samba Panic"

2019 Feb 28
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
Am 26.02.19 um 12:26 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:19:45AM +0100, Alexander Spannagel via samba > wrote: >> The huge delays are seen, when user isn't known to sssd and winbind >> tries to look that user without explicitly a domain given and the >> option "winbind use default domain" is on it's default of "No" in >>
2009 Apr 20
2
Getting mad with group permissions
I have a file server with two shares accessible to 2 different groups. After the last update ( from debian 2:3.2.5-4 to 2:3.3.2-1 ) i cannot any more access ONLY ONE of the two shares and I can't understand the reason! Can anyone hel me? I'm getting mad! Thanks Giorgio from smb.conf: [documenti_movi] path = /home/documenti_movi valid users = @staffmovi read
2011 Mar 28
2
winbind is not taking default domain
Hi, We have been running samba file server about 2 years without this problem. The problem appeared at the same time on our debian and centos servers. Not sure if it's related to any updates on our windows AD servers. Debian Squeeze sernet-samba-3.5.8-27 Centos 5.5 samba3-3.5.5-43.el5 Use Active Directory for user login authentication Use uid/gid from ldap The reason we still want winbind
2014 Jul 31
0
Access denied when accessing via hostname
Hi I'm using Samba 3.6.3 on ubuntu 12.04 as a domain member with AD on Win Server 2012. My hare is configured like this: valid users = @"EVSOFFICE.LOCAL+dangroup" When I try to connect to a share via IP from Win7 (part of the domain) it succeeds but when use host name \\node15 I can see shares but double-click on share shows AccessDenied. I'm trying to connect as
2010 Sep 29
4
Problem when "valid users" is used
Hi, When I use "valid users" in smb.conf to limit access on my share, I have this message with smbclient : [global] workgroup = MYDOM domain master = no local master = no security = user passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://x.x.x.x:389 ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com ldap suffix = dc=company,dc=com ldap user
2004 Sep 29
3
Oops from netlink or what?
I reported this previously and it was verified. Is this a bug in netlink or what? Who should I report this to? Original Oops report: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q2/012614.html Thanks. Linux rebecca 2.6.4 #1 Mon Sep 27 15:16:48 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Sep 27 19:02:58 rebecca kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 Sep 27 19:02:58
2006 Jun 19
2
3.0.23 + afsacl build problem
Hi! I've tried to compile samba 3.0.23rc2 --with-vfs-afsacl --fake-kaserver, but I've got errors. The first error and its solution is: I've to add -lssl to the LIBS line in the top level Makefile. Then I've got this: Compiling modules/vfs_afsacl.c with -fPIC modules/vfs_afsacl.c: In function `new_afs_ace': modules/vfs_afsacl.c:145: warning: passing arg 2 of
2003 Mar 19
1
migrating from Samba 2.0 to Samba 2.2 (AIX)
hello, I'm trying to migrate a rather simple configuration from a Samba 2.0.6 to Samba 2.2.8 , on an AIX system. smb.conf stays exactly the same & checked with testparm. File sharing works fine again, but not printing : smbd meets an internal error when a NT box tries to launch a print job. Sample of logfile : [2003/03/19 16:42:56, 10] lib/username.c:user_in_list(456) user_in_list:
2007 May 18
1
3.0.25 Winbind high CPU usage
I just upgraded from 3.0.23d to 3.0.25 and I'm noticing that winbind is chewing up a lot of CPU usage. There are always 2 winbindd processes and one uses about 80% cpu and the other use 15% cpu. When I run a tcpdump and look at the traffic going to/from the domain controller winbindd is connected to, there is a constant flow of traffic. Here is the winbind setup from my smb.conf file:
2015 Jul 31
1
samba-4.1.19: resolving local unix group failes when there exists a local unix user with same name
Hi, after upgrading samba from 4.1.17 to 4.1.19 on OpenSuSE 13.2, any shares offered by this machine can nolonger be accessed, when these shares contain an entry "force group" which specifies a local unix group and when there exists a unix user with the same name. Here's an excerpt from smb.conf: [FactWork] comment = FactWork-Downloadportal path =
2008 Nov 11
0
try 2: group setting doesn't work
Yesterday i had it working, today it breaks.. :( But at least i've turned on logging and can pass you the relevant section of the log ;) When i try to connect to the share 'web', NT throws an error 'The specified group does not exist' and refuses to connect. I'm using virtually the same smb.conf file; I've tried it without the first 3 lines in [global], same
2004 Apr 01
1
[patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Alex Vasylenko >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: [patch] net/rsync: problems in client name lookup code >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p16 >Description: rsync does reverse name
2006 Dec 12
2
samba3.0.23d group permissions not working
Dear all, I have samba3.0.23d running on FreeBSD 6.1. It is running with "security = ADS" and has been functioning correctly from about 3.0.14 to 3.0.22. Since I upgraded to 3.0.23(a|b|c|d) group permissions are not honoured by Samba. For example: drwxrwx--- 107 setup domain admins 3072 Nov 15 19:25 install The user setup is a windows admin user; this user can access this
2007 May 18
2
force group to Unix group in 3.0.25
Hi, I'm currently using v3.0.24 in production and all works well. I'm testing 3.0.25 to see if I'm going to have any problems with it if I have to upgrade. I have a problem with the "force group" setting if it is set to a local Unix group. This same setting works fine in 3.0.24 but I'm denied access to the same share in 3.0.25. If I comment off the "force
2011 Nov 02
1
difference between foo$a[2] <- 1 and foo[2,"a"] <- 1
Hallo Can anyone tell me the difference between foo$a[2] <- 1 and foo[2,"a"] <- 1 ? I thought that both expressions are equivalent, but when I run the following example, there is obviously a difference. > foo <- data.frame(a=NA,b=NA) > foo a b 1 NA NA > foo$a[1] <- 1 > foo$b[1] <- 2 > foo$a[2] <- 1 Error in `$<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`,
2007 Sep 10
0
User not permitted to access this share
Hi, I have two samba domains. On one member of DOMAIN1 I set up a share "intranet" with valid users = +"DOMAIN1+webmaster" +"DOMAIN2+TestGroup" Winbindd is running. When I try to access the share from a DOMAIN2 workstation permission is denied. When I look at the logfile, I see that the server tries to find the group of DOMAIN2 (TestGroup) in ldap of the local
2007 Dec 12
2
Vista SP1-rc1 appears to break against Samba-3.0.27a
We've got nicely ADS integrated Samba-3.0.27a servers that are working fine with Win2000 through to standard Vista. However, we are starting to test RC1 of Vista SP1 and discovered that once applied, that workstation cannot connect to Samba server shares - unless the share is open - i.e. no "valid user" style settings. The moment one is defined, Vista fails to connect and pops up an
2015 Mar 17
1
Samba working (has been for years) but logs full of NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Hi. My samba server is working for everybody but the logs are full of "NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED" messages So I turned logging a little higher and found out what shares/files are accessed when this happens. It, too, happens not to ALL users. I see this: guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (TestPrograms) [2015/03/17 16:00:58.165672, 1]
2006 Jul 20
2
Q: winbindd, unqualfied users, & name conflicts (a.k.a "Death to 'winbind use default domain'!")
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Volker, Assume I have a member server named LINUX joined to a domain name AD. Now assume I have a local user named foo in my passdb and a user named foo in the domain as well. I'm modifying winbindd_util.c:parse_domain_user() to do a lookup_name() to try to figure out which domain to prepend to the username rather than just assuming its a domain
2008 Aug 05
3
doveot reporting "No space left on device" - yet df show plenty of space / inodes.
Hi, I am running dovecot 1.0.rc7 on a Suse Linux server. The server has approx 200+ mailboxes. Last week the filesystem (/dev/mapper/datavg/dat2lv) ran out of space - causing it to do into read-only mode. When I realised this I allocated some more space and re-booted the machine... Strangely it seems that dovecot is still having problems... It's like dovecot doesn't realise that