similar to: authenticate Linux users to AD on Windows 2003R2

Hello, I configured samba fileserver as a member of samba domain. PDC and fileserver are different machines. It works great using windows sharing. Now, I need to set up apache to serve my shares, but I am having problem with permissions. Apache runs as www-user, and doesn't see content in shares. So I would like to ask, what is the proper way to use apache (or another http server) to serve

Is there any way to access to samba server via web, I mean that the users windows can access to samba server via web.

We're beginning a migration from FreeBSD w/ Samba Version 3.0.28a to Gentoo Linux w/ Samba Version 3.0.33. Both the BSD system and the Linux system are joined to the domain, using the same krb5.conf file and nearly identical global sections of the smb.conf file. What I've found is the UID and GID are not aligned with each other. For example: (dc2: 14:52:53 </var/db/samba>)

I've looked around and can't find the answer. We have a Samba file server joined to our Active Directory and using ACLs. We are enforcing quotas on this machine, but when specifying the home directory, the directory is owned by the person who created it. Using Windows and going into the security permissions, there doesn't seem to be a way to remove the owning user/group. When you hit

Hi all, According to this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566977 This particular error is actually a bug in the samba code. Does anyone know if there are patches that fix this ? Adding "allow_weak_crypto = true" to /etc/krb5.conf does not solve this for me :( Has anyone got a working solution for this ? -Alex IMPORTANT: This email remains the

What is the milestone that will get 3.5 into Debian Squeeze? Robert LeBlanc Life Sciences & Undergraduate Education Computer Support Brigham Young University

(please note that this mail is crossposted to 3 lists. No need to CC me to answers, I read the 3 of them...) Some users (including me with my professionnal hat) want to use 3.5 versions of samba on production servers running Debian. Of course, most of the time, these production servers are running Debian lenny (the stable version of the distribution). Debian lenny ships with samba 3.2.5, so

Hi, I'm using a domain where the DNS is hosted by a couple of domain controllers on the network, outside of my control. I do have ability to work with group policy and active directory users and computers. I was able to join a samba/linux computer to the domain using 'net rpc join -S <IP of local DC/DNS server>'. This caused an entry for the computer to show up in Active

Hello samba gurus, I have a couple of questions regarding Linux file systems, and their ability to mimic NTFS, and the other question is regarding winbind and its uncanny ability to virtually lock up a samba AD member server once connectivity to the AD is lost. I apologize if anyone gets annoyed by this question. Environment: I am using samba 3.2 with XFS+ACL support joined as a AD domain member

Hello everyone. I been working up with samba shared folders, but have some troubles with users/folder privileges. Users: ale jvillar I got a folder named "BACKUP" users ale and jvillar can read/write this folder inside "BACKUP" is another folder named "MAIL BACKUP" i want user ale to read/write this folder and user jvillar only read. Even though i tried everything i

Ok, here is the set-up. We have a domain that is the main domain, it handles DHCP and DNS for domain.edu. The DNS for domain.edu has NS records to delegate domain.local to our Active Directory. I am able to bind a machine just fine to the Active Directory without having to change any of the client DNS settings (which poing to domain.edu). File services work fine. I'm trying to work out single

================================================================= "I don't know anything about music. In my line you don't have to." Elvis Presley ================================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.4. Major enhancements in Samba 3.4.1 include:

================================================================= "I don't know anything about music. In my line you don't have to." Elvis Presley ================================================================= Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.4. Major enhancements in Samba 3.4.1 include:

Hi, We've just put in a Samba fileserver to replace our windows box for our School District and it seems to be working great. I have a question about defining some specific permissions though. We set up 'Drop boxes' for teachers that kids can drag files into, but they don't have read permission so they can't read each others submitted work. Here's what is looks like on

I've been trying to get Kerberos to work for the last couple of days so that we can use SSO. I can't seem to get past a roadblock and Google doesn't seem to provide any answers. I've got Samba connected to the AD and running. I can wbinfo everything and can login to the machine using PAM with the pam_winbind modules just fine. I can get user tickets just fine. When I try to get ssh

I'm wondering if I'm seeing a regression of 5616 with 3.4.8. I'm trying to set-up pptpd with winbind, which I'm doing on two machines on Debian lenny, and I'm trying on Debian Squeeze now. The Windows client is saying "Error 778: It was not possible to verify the identity of the server." The logs say that everything is ok, and that the client is hanging up the

Hi, I'm running 3.0.28a on Ubuntu 8.04 (their package). I've got security = ads and idmap backend = ad (smb.conf is posted below). I'm using libnss-ldap and have ldap in nsswitch.conf (also posted below) and ldap connected to the AD server. I have the drive mounted using acl and xattr_user options in fstab (acl is installed). I can connect to the share, I see in the logs that

Hi, We're running 3.0.31 (yes, I know that's old!) on a dual core processor, our kernel has SMB support and the dual core processor is recognized correctly, yet all (300+) smbd process seem to be hitting the same core! Is this our OS, the version of samba, something else? Any pointers would be much appreciated! Thanks, Steve -- Steve Rippl Technology Director Woodland Public Schools

Hi, this is kind of a strange situation. I have a share that I want to work like a drop box. I want users to be able to create new files and read existing files, but not be able to delete them (except for the owner of the dropbox). Does anyone know how to do this? I've tried every combination I could think of write list, read only, force group, and sticky bits on the directory itself.

In 1.6.0, when creating a MDT, you could specify multiple --mgsnode options and it would failover between them. 1.6.3 only seems to take the last one and --mgsnode=192.168.1.252 at o2ib:192.168.1.253 at o2ib doesn''t seem to failover to the other node. Any ideas how to get around this? Robert Robert LeBlanc College of Life Sciences Computer Support Brigham Young University leblanc at