similar to: LDAP - valid users = @group

My name is Gert Jensen and I am a newbe to Samba. I have tried installing it a few time and have run into the same problem no matter how I try to get the management module to load. Can someone on the list give me instructions or send me to a site where there are explicit instructions on how to set up SWAP with the latest version of Sambe and Red Hat 7.3. When I try to access

When logs (e.g. /var/log/maillog) are rotated (e.g. to /var/log/maillog-YYYYMDD) is there a way via systemd or whatever to assign read permission to a specific group? Right now, for example - ls -l maillog* -rw------- 1 root root 3105240 Mar 13 22:04 maillog -rw------- 1 root root 1079031 Feb 24 04:39 maillog-20190224 -rw------- 1 root root 7237640 Mar 1 12:59 maillog-20190228 -rw------- 1

Hi, Following my earlier posts about having problems performing a PCA, I have worked out what the problem is. The problem lies within the PLINK to gds conversion. It seems as though the SNPs are imported as "samples" and in turn, the samples are recognised as SNPs: >snpsgdsSummary("chr2L") Some values of snp.position are invalid (should be > 0)! Some values of

Hi folks, It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) Assume there is a share, where the files and folders in the share root should at least be readable by anybody having access to the share. For the sake of simplicity the following permissions apply on

Hi, I have two samba domains. On one member of DOMAIN1 I set up a share "intranet" with valid users = +"DOMAIN1+webmaster" +"DOMAIN2+TestGroup" Winbindd is running. When I try to access the share from a DOMAIN2 workstation permission is denied. When I look at the logfile, I see that the server tries to find the group of DOMAIN2 (TestGroup) in ldap of the local

Hai, > > In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch > Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). > > Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is no unix_primary_group > option for the clients. So I have to use the "dirty" tweak of > modifying all my users "primaryGroupID" to the corresponding >

Does you filesystem support extended attributes? What does "|getfattr -n security.NTACL |filename" return?|| On 30.01.2024 16:13, Peter Milesson wrote: > Hi folks, > > It seems that the setting acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes reduces > Windows compatibility when defined for a share. In all attempts I have > used Windows tools (except editing smb.conf) > > Assume

Hi, I've a question about the syntax of the valid users option. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here is the Background: samba 3.0.4 Linux as Domain Member Active Directory, not in Native Mode Compiler opions: --with-winbind --with-pam --with-smbmount The goal is to authenticate via the Windows Domain and allow access via Windows groups. The syntax in my smb.conf looks like this:

On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : >> Hai, >> >>> In short. My network design previously work with Debian Stretch >>> Servers and clients and some Windows clients (not many). >>> >>> Debian Stretch use Samba 4.5.16 so there is

Hello everyone, we are in the process of changing from a Windows Domain to a Samba Domain and tried to implement some restrictions for OU-Admins. In the Windows Domain those restrictions can be implemented with Security ID: S-1-3-4 (Owner Rights). In our old Windows Domain everything works fine and as expected. In our Samba Domain, it doesnt work. We tried to implement the same rights as in

Hi list, I'm having one of those 'I'm stupid' -problems with LVM on CentOS 5.2. I've been working with traditional partitions until now, but I've finally been sold on the theoretical benefits of using LVM, but for now I only have a huge pile of broken filesystems to show for my efforts. My scenario; I attach a disk, either over USB or iSCSI. I create a PV on this

Dear Friends, Is It Possible to Make a *Share* Visible to a List of Users *Only* ? e.g. If have shares Likes Account, Sales, Support Then I would Like make respective *share* visible *only* to persons in respective dept. Thanks and Best Regards.

On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > a ?crit : > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H. van Belle via samba >>> <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : >>>> Hai, >>>>

Hi there, I'm trying to configure Squid to use a windows domain for authentication, and all goes well until I add the "--require-membership-of" option on ntlm_auth. I need to restrict access based on group membership, however ntlm_auth does not seem to be behaving correctly. I'm using Samba 3.0.6 on Debian and I'm using a Windows 2000 (SP4) Domain Controller. I

Thank you Kees. On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 09:37, Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am currently running at 4.19.2 but I have run 4.18.6 and 4.18.5. I did > not experience any issues with nested group lookups, which many of the > filters rely on. Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the

Folks-- I'm working with an old system I set up to copy files from one local directory to another. I was using rdist for this, but I would prefer to shift it over to rsync. The one thing I'm missing is the trivial ability to force the group owernship of the destination files to a specific group. A read through the manpage and various searches on the web do not turn up any helpful hints

Hi, I'm running Samba Version 3.0.25c on Solaris 10 8/07 on X86 hardware. It's successfully joined to AD. But, and there always is a but, if : * A user is a member of SomeGroup * and the share alllows SomeGroup to access it * and SomeGroup is NOT what the user has set as their Primary Group in Active Directory then * Samba will recognize that the user can access the share * but,

hi all, i've spent an incredible amount of time trying to get samba working between linux (satan, debian testing, samba 3.0.0) and win2k (lucifer) and i'm at wit's end. i'm begging for help. i spent most of the morning reading samba docs, and have gone from knowing zilch about MS networking to, well, a little something about MS networking. my ultimate goal is to be able to

However.... When I try the command nmblookup -M TESTGROUP querying TESTGROUP on 192.168.255.255 name_query failed to find name TESTGROUP #1d My /etc/hosts file is # Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain 192.168.100.101 testpc 192.168.100.100 linuxserver /etc/samba/lmhosts is 127.0.0.1

Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 17:04, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> a ?crit : > > On 21/08/2019 15:14, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > > Le mer. 21 ao?t 2019 ? 14:34, Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> > > a ?crit : > > > >> On 21/08/2019 09:04, Prunk Dump via samba wrote: > >>> Le mar. 20 ao?t 2019 ? 14:30, L.P.H.