similar to: Any Known Share limitations or performance issues with large file systems

Hey llvm-dev, What's the best method to test performance of Clang generated executables? Are the nightly tests in test-suite sufficient? I'm looking for publicly available tests/suites with a good breadth of coverage... Thanks, Cam -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, I am trying to implement statepoints for the AArch64 target and I’m running into the issue where the following bitcode: define i32 addrspace(1)* @test(i32 addrspace(1)* %ptr) gc "statepoint-example" { entry: call token (i64, i32, i1 ()*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i1f(i64 0, i32 0, i1 ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 addrspace(1)* %ptr) ret

Eh - I'd say "Big" new features (hey, LLVM supports DWARFv5, or Split DWARF, or DWARF type units, or DWARF compression (though I don't think I wrote any release notes for several of those features that I implemented)). I wouldn't bother release noting changes in output format for tools we don't consider to have stable output, or changes in robustness/better error

Hi Devs, since risc-v has a register $tp which is thread pointer. is it possible to have __builtin_thread_pointer for RISC-V? I am not sure what could be corresponding instructions? ./kamlesh

This approximately follows my understanding and expectation. I think that, if you have commit access, commits to improve release notes fall under the contribution guidelines for documentation and therefore do not require a full Phabricator review. I know Alex Bradbury tries to coordinate the RISC-V backend-related release notes based on the backend changes since the last release, and this seems

Hi all, I have a global array declared as: table = internal constant [8 x [256 x i32]] ... At the moment I'm able to get the reference to table using Constant* g_var = cast<GlobalVariable>(I.getOperand(0))->getInitializer(); ( please consider I to be a GetElementPtrInst object ). Now I would like to understand how to get the address of table[2][3], for instance, considering that I

Thanks. I have checked the hook DAGCombiner::isMulAddWithConstProfitable And I think the above condition is too aggressive. // If the add only has one use, this would be OK to do. if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse()) return true; Shall we make it to if (AddNode.getNode()->hasOneUse() && TargetLowering.isCheaperCommuteAddMul(......)) return true; The virtual hook

All, I have a fresh CentOS 5.2 server that I am just starting to customize, it is very close to stock. This morning I ran yum update: ============================================================================= Installing: kernel-xen i686 2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 updates 15 M Updating: samba i386 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 updates 16 M

Hi, Sam. I think that it's a fair comparison. Keep in mind that the GP is only used to reach global variables of local scope and the GOT, where the address of global variables of global scope reside. This model assumes that the distance between the GP and the global data area, GOT and local scope variables is defined at link time. __ Evandro Menezes ◊ SiFive ◊ Austin, TX > On Mar

There are 1500 tests total, and about 100 on the platform-agnostic blacklist. Alex and I do not think this is an onerous burden for maintenance, either as an external test suite or if the test suite is imported. In the long term, if we import the tests, we know we will have to do updates when the Embecosm work lands, and beyond that updates can be more sporadic. It’s not clear to me how much

On 2020-04-30, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev wrote: >For the tools (which I know is mostly what James works on) I’d say new command-line options are worth release-noting as a way to advertise their existence. > >From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of David Blaikie via llvm-dev >Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 11:47 AM >To: James Henderson <jh7370.2008

Hi all developers, I'm changing compiler from gcc to llvm on a RISCV target now. but I found in some case the assembly code generated by llvm is much more than gcc. It cause my program's performance about 40% decrease. The flowing is a simple test code. It shows the problem. We can see than gcc prefer to use pointer to iterate the array, but llvm perfere to use index to iterate

I am trying to install the source code for samba. I have samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 When I try and install the samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1.src.rpm. I get the following..... rpm -ihv samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1.src.rpm 1:samba warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: group mockbuild does not exist - using root warning: user mockbuild does not exist - using root warning:

TL;DR: I am proposing to add the GCC C Torture suite [1], as an additional external source of tests for the “nightly” test suite. If you are willing to review the patch, it is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66887 Background: While working on the RISC-V backend, we have found it useful to use additional test suites beyond the in-tree Clang and LLVM tests and the LLVM nightly tests, in order to

Hi, the latest upstream version of samba rpms for 5.2 is samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1. In the Centos 5.2 updates tree there is only samba-3.0.28-0.el5.8 which also is already part of the 5.2 os tree. Could it be that the updates tree just carries the wrong rpms? Best regards, Bernd

Shifting from a v2 samba server to v3 - Read documentation and googled LOTS but can't seem to find the bits that apply to my simple(?) server with regards to groups. # rpm -qi samba Version : 3.0.28 Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release : 1.el5_2.1 Source RPM: samba-3.0.28-1.el5_2.1.src.rpm Samba on server (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2) IS MOSTLY WORKING... home directories

Op di 3 sep. 2019 om 18:36 schreef Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > On 9/3/19 7:19 AM, Sam Elliott wrote: > > There are 1500 tests total, and about 100 on the platform-agnostic > blacklist. Alex and I do not think this is an onerous burden for > maintenance, either as an external test suite or if the test suite is > imported. > > > >

---------------------------- OS: CentOS 5.2 Samba: Samba 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 Printer: HP LaserJet P2105n ---------------------------- I setup a linux print server for windows clients. First I downloaded the printer drivers for windows from HP website (both the Universal Printer Driver PCL6 and the PCL6 driver for P2105 series), and installed them on my windows client, then it created a local printer

On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 17:34, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 8/30/19 10:18 AM, Sam Elliott via llvm-dev wrote: > > TL;DR: I am proposing to add the GCC C Torture suite [1], as an additional external source of tests for the “nightly” test suite. If you are willing to review the patch, it is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66887 >

Thank you for both of your input. Yes, I try to cross-compile for AVR, the simple ATMEGA328P used in every Arduino Uno. My main motivation being that I hope to be able to use a couple of STL containers, <functional> and <type_traits> on the MCU. Not sure though if this can be reached by going via the clang route. Getting back to the compilation: when I run clang with both both