similar to: Limit winbind to a certain Domain

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Limit winbind to a certain Domain"

2007 Mar 08
0
chown/chgrp for winbind users doesn`t work
Hello, I have two Samba Domains and each trust each other (PDCs run 3.0.22). Also I have a samba member server (3.0.24) that runs winbind. When I use wbinfo I can see the user and groups of both domains. I also can chown/chgrp files with users of the domain the server is member of. But I can`t chown/chgrp with accounts of the trusted domain. chown doesn`t work at all. chgrp works, but then only
2007 Mar 13
3
Owner/Permissions and winbind
Hello, I have two Samba Domains and each trust each other (PDCs run 3.0.22). Also I have a samba member server (3.0.24) that runs winbind. When I use wbinfo I can see the user and groups of both domains. I also can chown/chgrp files with users of the domain the server is member of. But I can`t chown/chgrp with accounts of the trusted domain. chown doesn`t work at all. chgrp works, but then only
2007 Aug 27
1
Subnet not visible in Network Neighbourhood
Hi list! I've got a debian "etch" box running samba 3.0.24. The server is a firewall (running Shorewall 3.2.6) with five NICs: eth0 -> DSL (it has a public IP address and it allows all the people browse by masquerading other interfaces) eth1 and eth3 -> bond0 (IP address is 192.168.1.1/24) eth2 and eth4 -> bond1 (IP address is 192.168.2.1/24) BTW, bond+ refers to an
2017 Mar 28
0
`[` not recognized as a primitive in certain cases.
Thank you gents, I overlooked the subtle differences. On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Lukas Stadler <lukas.stadler at oracle.com> wrote: > ?typeof? is your friend here: > > > typeof(`[`) > [1] "special" > > typeof(mc[[1]]) > [1] "symbol" > > typeof(mc2[[1]]) > [1] "special" > > so mc[[1]] is a symbol, and thus not a
2009 Feb 16
1
Trustom not working after upgrade to 3.3.0
Hello, I was running 3.2.4 successfully with trustdom relationship (one way only) working perfectly. I'm trying now to upgrade to 3.3.0, but the relationship seems to be down now. Revoking and re establishing did not help. I had the same issue while trying to update to 3.2.6 By checking the logs, it seems that trusting domain PDC is not sending the correct password to trusted domain PDC
2006 Feb 27
0
Two PDCs Samba trustrealtionship --> winbind configuration
Greetings! I have the following configuration: Two PDCs (Samba 3.0.21b) with Fedora Core 4: PDC1 and PDC2. PDC1 trusts PDC2, respectively PDC2 is trusted to PDC1. I join an XP workstation to PDC2. After restart i can see both domains in the login screen domain combo box. I can logon to PDC2 , but not to PDC1, since the
2007 May 21
1
Altered behavior in 3.0.25 and 3.0.24-gc-1
By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. with the following configuration security = DOMAIN password server = PDC encrypt passwords = yes map to guest = Bad Password The Samba PDCs use plain smbpasswd files. Since upgrading to 3.0.25 and
2007 Feb 28
1
Winbindd has still bottlenecks when used with interdomain trusts.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings! I run samba 3 since several years in a domain with more than 10000 users and multiple departments. We have a central Domain running a PDC and some domains in the departments. The domains in the departments are connected to the central domain via interdomain trusts. All PDCs are samba 3 using the same LDAP backends (very fast SunONE LDAP
2005 Nov 21
2
Can Winbind go directly to LDAP/Kerberos? Or is it PDC NTLM only?
Hi. I am tinkering with PADL and Kerberos PAM, so that I can have account authentication and directory directly to AD KDC/LDAP. I always thought that windbind provided support for NT-style PDC for authentication and referencing account-directory, and thus only work in AD mixed-mode where PDC emulator is used for backwards compatibility. However, I was reading a book that seemed to indicate that
2017 Mar 28
2
`[` not recognized as a primitive in certain cases.
?typeof? is your friend here: > typeof(`[`) [1] "special" > typeof(mc[[1]]) [1] "symbol" > typeof(mc2[[1]]) [1] "special" so mc[[1]] is a symbol, and thus not a primitive. - Lukas > On 28 Mar 2017, at 14:46, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> wrote: > > There is a difference between the symbol and the function (primitive >
2007 Jul 10
3
winbind + samba limits with large AD?
Hi, a few months ago I tried to setup samba + winbind (debian etch, amd64, samba 3.0.24). I followed the howto and got the authentication running. But I had not much success with winbind. I disabled the user/group enumeration, but this didn't change it. A simple 'ls -l' in a directory with 10-20 files took minutes to return the list and most of the time winbindd just stopped working
2009 Feb 24
6
Can't modify ms word files with samba 3.3
Hello, I tried this week to upgrade my samba 3.2.4 (2 PDCs one trusting the other) to samba 3.3.0 then samba 3.3.1, and apart from the problem with winbindd and trusted domain, my users are not able to modify any ms word document (excel does the same). You can open the file correctly, modify it, and when saving it, it pops up "Access denied" If you try to save the file in the same
2002 May 16
0
unusual use of Samba for authentication of W2k??
Hi all, I got a new assignment today. My task is to install LDAP instead of NIS in our network, consisting of Solaris, Linux and W2k. Our actual setup is like this: Accounts are kept on a Solaris-server and served with samba and NFS. Two PCs serve as PDCs, running NOT samba on unix but a real W2k. Special MS-PAM-modules on the Solaris-server are used to synchronise accounts and passwords with
2002 Nov 07
0
Problems authentication with NT PDCs in security = se rver (was security = user)
James: (Again someone correct me if I'm wrong) PAM allows local access to the Samba machine as well as authenticating Samba users. Winbind *only* allows for Samba access. This is why I chose *not* to use PAM in my setup. I don't want normal users to have local logon access to *MY* servers. <evil grin> With Winbind, you don't need PAM at all. If you're planning on
2004 Jul 09
0
Winbind & client services
Hi, We're running Samba 3.0.4 compiled from the srpms and they're setup as PDC for two domains (tdbsam backend). Both servers are working fine for domain authentication. Previously we hadn't been using winbind but decided to try the extra functionality and fired it up. The only change that we can see is that now when the clients login, a whole mess of services fail like Computer
2011 Oct 30
2
Bad creation timestamp of migrated mails (maildir format)?
Hello everybody, ive just switched to dovecot imap because dbmail i used before is not developed any further and sql storage is difficult to backup. Ive done that, by setting up dovecot with maildir format and copy mails from old dbmail to new dovecot imap server with my mail client (thunderbird). Unfortunately migrating to dovecot brought me some problems with my Android K9 Mail client: Sync
2004 Oct 29
0
Re: Trusting and trusted domain (home mapping) problem
Hi Igor, Once again, thanks for keeping up with me. I have been migrating my master ldap server to 2.1 version so to keep it the same with the PDCs version of LDAP. Now they are the same. I have rectified such that "wbinfo -u" on both sides worked now. I am made "net rpc trustdom list" worked. It was not working before. I had to put "stuadmin = root" in the
2002 Nov 07
0
Problems authentication with NT PDCs in security = server (was security = user)
The interesting part is that PAM nor the SMB auth plugin for Apache requires you to be a member of the domain. However, the caveat with pam_smb_auth is that you have to have a unix account for every windows user you want to authenticate. I guess the behavior I'm trying to achieve is the one achieved with the Apache plugin: 1) Doesn't require you to be a member of the domain 2)
2003 Dec 28
0
Connecting two LANs over a slow link
Hi, I'm having some trouble connecting the SMB networks on two LANs that are connected over a "slow" (DSL) link: Network B: 172.16.0.0/24 Domain B: office Network A: 172.16.1.0/24 Domain A: home gate.office and gate.home are the respective networks' NAT gateways connecting to the internet over ADSL lines. The private IP spaces are connected to each other via an ipsec tunnel
2004 Mar 22
0
Samba3 Trust Relationships?
Hey all, After setting up a migration server (a server which will act as a test for a Samba 3.x environment), so we can make sure our migration from Samba 2.2.x to 3.x goes as smoothly as possible, I've hit upon a problem, now I am not sure whether this is the fault of Samba (my configuration) or NT4 or whether this is infact designed behaviour for both/either servers. I'd like to