similar to: Export smbpasswd to LDAP

Hi all, I mounted by smbmount a partition on a winNT machine without problem... but when i tried to copy a file whitch have size more than 2 Gb i have the following error : Overflow size allowed for a file (translated from french ;-) :D?bordement de la taille permise pour un fichier ) PS. the file system of the harde drive is NTFS PS. The command of smbmount : /usr/sbin/smbmount

Hello, I am running a samba 3.0.32 under fedora core 9. I only try to authenticate users against a ldap server. Of course this server knows the encrypted password as microsoft does. I entered the ldap password using smbpasswd to query into the ldap. After this, I just obtain a message like "you don't have rights to ...". What errors do I make ??? Any ideas will be appreciated

I've followed the OpenLDAP + SAMBA Domain Controller tutorial step-by-step: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=640760 And after long hours, and enless googling, I've yet to find a solution. LDAP works great SAMBA works great. But the intergration between them don't work. Here is the samba log: root:/etc# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd smbd version 3.0.28a started. Copyright

Hello, I've just installed samba with ldap on a debian etch. I have a problem when i attempt to create a user with the command smbldap-useradd -a -P -c "toto DUPONT" -u 1001 toto and to log in with it after. I obtain this error : [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 0] passdb/pdb_get_set.c:pdb_get_group_sid(164) pdb_get_group_sid: Failed to find Unix account for toto [2008/10/29 17:35:26, 1]

Hi, this is kind of a strange situation. I have a share that I want to work like a drop box. I want users to be able to create new files and read existing files, but not be able to delete them (except for the owner of the dropbox). Does anyone know how to do this? I've tried every combination I could think of write list, read only, force group, and sticky bits on the directory itself.

I just noticed I'm getting some pretty extreme CPU usage on my Samba server when transferring files. The Samba server has a quad core 2.0gHz Core2. During transfers, CPU use spikes to 100-200% with a throughput around 30MB/s. I'm using the registry config backend. [global] use kerberos keytab = True server string = X dns proxy = yes log file =

Hello all, I'm new to OpenLDAP and a moderate Samba admin. My nights became not so good while trying to get running OpenLDAP + Samba as PDC on a Slackware 12.1 server... Well, the scenario is: I have a functional and already running OpenLDAP base that provides login for users on Web apps. My actual PDC is an old MS NT4 Server. I'm using the default Samba (v. 3.0.28a) installed by

Hi guys, I posted this question at virt list on Fedora Project but I guess its a best place to ask help for my problem. I'm trying to set up two kvm/libvirt hosts, I installed the set of packages contained in @kvm and @clustering groups, downloaded and installed glusterfs version 3.1.2, configured the cluster ( all working ), configured the gluster volume and mounted it on

Hello, i write because i have a doubt. I installed on an ubuntu server 12.04 64 bits the service nut with the command apt-get install nut. I configured nut and all is running fine except the shutdown the ups. I find a driver patch (source code) and it solves my problem. This i probe in a virtual machine with the same ubuntu, i compile and do the tests. My question is how i change in the production

Hello people, My difficult is get "nss_ldap" compiled and running on my server. I download the tgz file from PADL Software Pty Ltd website, decompress/untar, and then run "./configure" . ./configure runs just fine with no error message. Things go bad when I type: make This is the output after I try to do "make": root@ldap:~/nss_ldap-262# make make all-am make[1]:

Here is the general procedure to do this: First, you must compile nut yourself on ubuntu, with the patch, then rename the existing NUT binaries to backup files and copy over your modified binaries to where the original binaries were. However, since these patches are local, if the nut package maintainer for Ubuntu releases a new package, your patches will be overwritten. To fix this, after you

Samba 3.2.1 on linux OpenFiler 2.3 I have an external LDAP server with anonymous bind and pam ProFtpd linked to LDAP server works well without error But samba does not work, in smbd.log I have: [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] passdb/secrets.c:fetch_ldap_pw(888) fetch_ldap_pw: neither ldap secret retrieved! [2008/09/09 22:01:54, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(952) ldap_connect_system:

Hi, I didn't do any serious benchmarking but so far I never found a case where LLVM does better than IAR on CortexM0, but I saw a lot of cases where IAR output is better than LLVM... That said I did not use -Os or -Oz, I just used -O3. A recurrent situation is that LLVM push/pop one or two extra registers compared to IAR, I guess it does so in order to comply with a standard ABI or

What about benchmarks on other Arm devices? On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only device. There hasn't been any concerted > effort to tune LLVM's Thumb1 output in quite a long time. Even back then > (2008 or so), the effort was mainly to get it to work acceptably, with > the real performance tuning work being done for Thumb2. I'm not >

Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only device. There hasn't been any concerted effort to tune LLVM's Thumb1 output in quite a long time. Even back then (2008 or so), the effort was mainly to get it to work acceptably, with the real performance tuning work being done for Thumb2. I'm not surprised that an embedded market focussed compiler like IAR is better tuned for a chip like that. -Jim On Feb

I've not run any on non-iOS devices, and haven't looked at GCC since v4.2.1 due to licensing issues, so I don't have a good feel for comparative benchmarking. -Jim On Feb 26, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > What about benchmarks on other Arm devices? > > On 02/26/2013 02:52 PM, Jim Grosbach wrote: >> Cortex-M0 is a Thumb1 only

I gave the following function to IAR compiler (targeting CortexM0) and to clang/LLVM 3.2 (clang -O3 -target thumbv6-eabi -emit-llvm) int calleeSave8(int in[]){ int out=0; int i; for(i=0;i<8;i++){ out ^= in[i] & in[(i+1)%8]; }//expand to out = (in[0]&in[1])^(in[1]&in[2])^(in[2]&in[3])^(in[3]&in[4])^(in[4]&in[5])^(in[5]&in[6])^(in[6]&in[7])^(in[7]&in[0])

Have you tried armv7? -bw On Feb 2, 2013, at 3:50 PM, matic at nimp.co.uk wrote: > I gave the following function to IAR compiler (targeting CortexM0) and to clang/LLVM 3.2 (clang -O3 -target thumbv6-eabi -emit-llvm) > > int calleeSave8(int in[]){ > int out=0; > int i; > for(i=0;i<8;i++){ > out ^= in[i] & in[(i+1)%8]; > }//expand to out =

Hi, clang -O3 -target thumbv7-eabi -emit-llvm ... llc ... -debug -O3 -code-model=small -march=thumb -mcpu=cortex-m3 ... Does generate slightly better code, but it still computes 7 xor + 7 and. Anyway this should be a target independent optimization isn't it ?? Cheers Sebastien On 2013-02-04 16:46, Bill Wendling wrote: > Have you tried armv7? > > -bw > > On Feb 2,

Hi! I have 8 subnets: 192.168.100.x/24 192.168.150.y/24 192.168.200.z/16 etc ... Install a Primary Domain Controller (PDC), so that users to perform authentication on the domain with its mounting remote disks, among others. The network is correctly configured, that is, the teams are perfectly by "ping" and the open ports between the networks see no problems. Notes: - I disabled the