similar to: ACL execute bits always set

Hello all. Seems I can't find the root cause of $subj. When I store a file on my "home", it gets chmodded ugo+x ... My smb.conf is: -8<-- [global] workgroup = PERSONALE realm = PERSONALE.EXAMPLE.COM server string = Local shares netbios name = STR00160-SAMBA security = ADS encrypt passwords = true password server =

Hello, I currently try to copy a directory locally between two ext4 filesystems while preserving permissions and ACLs using the -aAX options. Under some conditions, rsync does not copy the posix permissions completely, it changes the group::rwx to a group::--- permission. The latest rsync available on Debian Jessie is 3.1.1, but the changelog for 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 did not seem to mention such a bug

All, I am building a glusterfs environment for file storage and need to use ACL's. The CentOS system is joined to AD. We have ingested data into the Gluster environment at /toplevel. OS: CentOS 7.3 Glusterfs: 3.10.5 Samba: 4.4.4 smb.conf: [global] workgroup = GROUP security = ADS realm = GROUP.DOMAIN.COM template homedir = /home/%U template shell

Hi everyone I have these shares in smb.conf: [home2] path = /home2 read only = No [home] path = /home2/home read only = No I mount [home] on a Linux client like this: mount -t cifs //hh1/home2 /home2 -osec=krb5,rw,multiuser Here is the output of the mount command: //hh1/home2 on /home2 type cifs

Hello, i also fired up a new vm :) and configured "rid" backend. I followed all step in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs. Sett the Attributs in smb.conf: vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes Granting the SeDiskOperatorPrivilege: # net rpc rights grant "SAMDOM\Domain Admins" SeDiskOperatorPrivilege

Hello! A good day to you all. i seem to be experiencing a quirk with my test setup, as i am unable to delete files/folders even with the proper ACL entries. i am using the stock samba 3 package on FC4(samba-3.0.14a-2), and have set up winbind authentication against a Windows NT 4 PDC. i've created two users, user1 and user2, which have their primary group set to group1(gid=16777221) as

I'm trying to use samba to share some files with ACL. But when i create a new folder or file, I have to press F5 before I can see any change on the folder. For example: I create a new folder on a directory. But I can?t see it until i press F5 Someone knows how to fix it? Acabo de compartir una carpeta en samba la cual tiene permisos de ACL. Solamente cuando accedo a esta carpeta, al crear

Please if anyone has any info... Neil Wilson wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) > "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" > > I get the following. > > mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ > # file: Admin > # owner: BCP+administrator > # group: samba

Hello Eric, I am taking Buck and the rsync mailing list into the CC. Buck is the author of the rsync patch, he may know more on that problem. On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:16, Eric Chen wrote: > From my understanding, the effecive rights mask 'limits the effective > rights granted to all groups and to named users', so if you getfacl on a > file, the group permissions will be

>> Side question: How is it even possible that Windows "remembers" the >> ACL it sets but it's not visible on Linux when using getfacl? Windows ACLs are being stored in Extended Attributes using the acl_xattr vfs module. Linux ACLs are not there because the line acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes is telling Samba not to write them. On 13 May 2018 21:25, Viktor

>> Side question: How is it even possible that Windows "remembers" the >> ACL it sets but it's not visible on Linux when using getfacl? Windows ACLs are being stored in Extended Attributes using the acl_xattr vfs module. Linux ACLs are not there because the line acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes is telling Samba not to write them. On 13 May 2018 21:25, Viktor

Hello! From what I realized the problem is not in Samba, but in the way that ACL work, with mascara question. I did several tests: touch bla chmod 700 ls -l bla -rwx------ 1 USERX domain users 0 Jun 29 09:53 bla cp bla /home/QUALIDADELEIT getfacl /home/QUALIDADELEIT getfacl /home/QUALIDADELEITE/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: home/QUALIDADELEITE/ #

Hi, i got a problem with a samba share... let's say i have 2 folders. the first folder is only accessible by 1 group (sharepriv), which has r/w access. getfacl output: Code: # file: complete/ # owner: elfish # group: elfish user::rwx group::rwx group:sharepriv:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:group:sharepriv:rwx default:mask::rwx default:other::--- the

I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are saved. Here is an example: username: user1 group membership: Domain Users directory: /share/test file: test.xls getfacl /share # file: share # owner: DOMAIN+backupuser #

Hello, My name is Hiro. I'm using samba 3.0.21b-2(acl) and RHEL4.1(kernel 2.6.9-11.ELsmp) + AD Server Following problem: When the attribute of the group of the folder was set to a full control twice, the member of the group became inaccessible. I want to know this problem is BUG or SPEC. One example [smb.conf] security = ADS acl check permissions = no acl group control = no acl map

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > Hello, > > I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via > cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it > with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the > wiki describes. Everything works fine. I can manage the users and > permissions with the RSAT tools.

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 10:52:47 +0100 Micha Ballmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Im sorry last mail was not complete. > > ... > -> Login to Windows with administrator and connect to FILESERVER via > "Computer Management" -> Chosing Demo Share and going to security Tab > -> > > Cant set any ACL because, permission denied! >

On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > > Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I