similar to: Fwd: Samba memory usage - how big is it?

Hi, this is kind of a strange situation. I have a share that I want to work like a drop box. I want users to be able to create new files and read existing files, but not be able to delete them (except for the owner of the dropbox). Does anyone know how to do this? I've tried every combination I could think of write list, read only, force group, and sticky bits on the directory itself.

Sorry my bad I forgot to reply all. Begin forwarded message: > From: Mike Gallamore <mike@mpi-cbg.de> > Date: November 7, 2008 12:35:20 PM GMT+01:00 > To: "degbert degbert" <degbert42@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [Samba] AD howtos: LDAP needed? > > My understanding is AD was/is MS's implementation of LDAP. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_directory

Hi, Here are my settings: I have a samba server running samba 3.0.24 on redhat EL4 (kernel 2.6.9-5.ELsmp) and a samba client running samba 3.2.3-0.20.fc9 on fc9 (kernel 2.6.26.5-45.fc9.x86_64). A share on server is mounted on client using sudo mount //server/data /mnt/data -o user=me,workgroup=group,rw,file_mode=0600,dir_mode=0700 The problems are (in the directory /mnt/data), if I use

Hi, I've 4 Samba servers running 3.0.21c in solaris 10 zones. One PDC, 3 BDCs. The machines are identically installed and the samba binaries and associated libraries are copied between the machines so are also identical. On my PDC which seems to be accepting almost all of the clients, my smbd processes are 33M with 25M resident. This seems to be used by dev:32,0 ino301938 ,see pmap

Hi all. We have a file server using samba with a lot of Mac clients. Mac uses files called .DS_Store to store information about the layout of the files in the directory. We have a hierarchal storage system, and don't want to back up the thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of .DS_store files. Currently we have a policy in place that these files don't get backed up, but they

I have a no-frill samba server that users can access their home directories from. Now, I'd like to set up a share that contains a file that only I can write to, but anyone can read it. I only seem to be able to do one or the other. If I can write to it, no one can read it. If everyone can read it, I can't write to it. I must be misunderstanding the settings of the options that I

Hi, I'm running dovecot 1.2.15, on Debian squeeze. /var/mail is owned by group "mail" with permissions "g+rwxs,o=". The mail_privileged_group setting is set to "mail". I am trying to access mail on a remote machine with mutt by tunnelling mutt though ssh and running `dovecot --exec-mail imap` on the mail server. But I frequently get errors in the mail

Hi I'm having problems with the dfree option on a Solaris 10 fileserver. Specifically: I had 3.0.X on the fileserver and the dfree option worked fine. I upgraded to 3.2.2 and now if dfree is enabled the clients get 1MB reported as the size of the share and when a client tries to right to the system they get told that the filesystem is full. The script output has been tested throughly

If you're one of the people who has cvsup'd to 4.8-stable since August 8th and you've since begun to experience panics on a previously stable system, please apply the attached patch and see if your previous stability has been restored. Please tell me your results. Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack -------------- next part -------------- diff -u -r

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:30 PM, ?? <chenxi at shudun.com> wrote: > Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become > very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and > some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed > out > but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster >

Using the host name of the volume, its related gluster commands can become very slow .For example,create,start,stop volume,nfs related commands. and some time And in some cases, the command will return Error : Request timed out but If using ip address to create the volume. The volume all gluster commands are normal. I have configured /etc/hosts correctly,Because,SSH can normally use the

Hello, I have a FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE amd64 box which gives this message with apache 2.2 very often. Previously the contents of the box was on 6.3-STABLE x86 and I had no such problems. This started right away when we moved to 7, 64bit. FreeBSD web.XXXXX.com 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue Apr 22 02:13:30 UTC 2008 yurtesen@web.XXXXX.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEB amd64 Approaching the

Hi, On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 07:14:29AM -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > >Synopsis: vmware2 broken on -STABLE, presumably by PAE import >> (..) Your patch makes VmWare2 build, but it doesn't make it work: - VmWare fails to allocate memory (see http://anders.fix.no/test/vmware/1.png and http://anders.fix.no/test/vmware/2.png). - There seems to be something wrong with

Hi all, our systems have suffered a node failure in a replica three setup. The node needed a complete reinstall. I followed the RH guide to replace a host with the same hostname (https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_gluster_storage/3/html/administration_guide/sect-replacing_hosts). The machine has the same OS (CentOS 7). The new machine got a minor version number newer gluster

Just trying to understand if anything might be going on with this crash dump or just faulty hardware ? dmesg at the end ---Mike # gdb -k /kernel.debug vmcore.0 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type

Sorry to append, but I just realised that of course ``` x |> ? pmap(c) |> ? reduce(c) |> ? unname() ``` also works and is a general solution in case your list has more than three elements. Here, we map in parallel over all elements of the list, always combining the current set of elements into a vector, and then reduce the resulting list into a vector by combining the elements

Hi Rolf, this topic is probably already saturated, but here is a tidyverse solution: ``` library(purrr) x <- list( ? `1` = c(7, 13, 1, 4, 10), ? `2` = c(2, 5,? 14, 8, 11), ? `3` = c(6, 9, 15, 12, 3) ) x |> ? pmap(~ c(..1, ..2, ..3)) |> ? reduce(c) #> [1]? 7? 2? 6 13? 5? 9? 1 14 15? 4? 8 12 10 11? 3 ``` Here, we map over the elements of the list in parallel (hence pmap),

Could you share the following information: 1. gluster --version 2. output of gluster volume status 3. glusterd log and all brick log files from the node where bricks didn't come up. On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Richard Neuboeck <hawk at tbi.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Hi all, > > our systems have suffered a host failure in a replica three setup. > The host needed a

I see a book coming: "666 ways to do the same thing in R ranked by sexiness." Kidding aside, if you look under the covers of some of the functions we are using, we may find we are taking steps back as some of them use others and perhaps more functionality than we need. But for a new reader , looking at many approaches may open up other ways and ideas and see the problem space as quite

Calum, I know Rolf for a while so I will not accept any calumny about his intentions. He stated what he wanted, albeit imperfectly, and interacted with us as we came up with ideas. I have seen others who ask some open-ended question, often using a brand new idea, and do not interact. Some rumors have it that there may be motives ranging from wasting everyone?s time to gathering the best