similar to: Curious Question about Multiple CIFSD's

Hi I think I hit the cifs bug described at http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/WindowsShares and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1776 As CentOS Wiki said, CentOS 5.0 do have a bug fixed cifs.ko, so I thought it should be in CentOSPlus repository ... so I upgrade my kernel and using 2.6.18-8.1.10.el5.centos.plus. After I use this kernel release, I check the cifs.ko and see the following: $

Hello *, Not sure if this is to much OT for this list: Problem: Around 10 000 + messages in dmesg / syslog like this: CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -126 CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -126 the concerned site does cifs mounts for individual user homes against netapp servers There is only one server showing those multiple messages. How may

Samba list: We are mounting a share provided by a Unisys MCP mainframe with the following fstab entry.... /etc/fstab: //UnisysMCPmainframe.example.com/staging_test /mnt/staging cifs rw,file_mode=0775,dir_mode=0775,uid=4051,gid=4053,credentials=/etc/nx-credentials.txt,_netdev 0 0 The mount is established just fine and works with the exception that the mainframe does not support the POSIX utime()

Hi All, I seem to have exactly the same problem which was described in this thread a while ago. I have gone through every piece of information I was able to find on mailing list archives but all I found was people reporting similar problems and not a solution to it. As in the original discussion if I use smbclient it works fine but if I use mount.cifs it does not work at all. To make smbclient

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Now, this is not apparently very common to CentOS or EL server, but I need to hibernate one of myservers after a batch job daily. Current kernel appears to fail with pm-hibernate now. $ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 6.8 (Final) $ uname -a Linux xxxx 2.6.32-642.3.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jul 12 18:30:56 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I have a Linux Server (3.06 Xeon) with a very fast RAID array -- reads at around 500 MB/sec as clocked by Bonnie++. I have 6 GigE nics on my machine -- on two 133Mhz PCI-x bus segments (not on the same bus as the RAID drives) I have noticed two puzzling things and I'm wondering if anybody has any ideas about why I'm seeing these: 1) transfer speeds over a single NIC from a single

Do anyone have any experience using 10 Gigabit Ethernet connections with Samba? Specifically, if you have had such an experience, can you share what sorts of optimizations you made to get the maximum data transfer between server and workstation? I am just experimenting with this kind of setup myself and I see a huge GULF between the raw TCP/IP transfers that I can make between two

Can anybody explain why SOME Windows XP applications have trouble writing files larger than 2 GB (or sometimes larger than 4 GB) to Linux Samba shares, when OTHER Windows applications on the same machine do not have difficulty writing large files to the same Samba share? And when the underlying Linux filesystem supports very large files? I have sometimes even found that a SINGLE Windows

The big problem that I have with non-directio is that buffering delays program execution. When reading/writing files that are many times larger than RAM without directio, it is very apparent that system response drops through the floor- it can take several minutes for an ssh login to prompt for a password. This is true both for UFS and ZFS. Repeat the exercise with directio on UFS and there is no

I have spent most of the past 24 hours reading various samba docs and searching google for help -- but can't find a solution. Suggestions and solutions would be appreciated. I have set up a Linux Box (Samba 3.02) as a PDC with roaming profiles. (I haven't upgraded, because this box is a model for over 100 other boxes in the field). I can add XP users to the domain and their roaming

I recently upgraded from Samba 3.0.2a to Samba 3.0.11. I didn't change anything in my smb.conf file. But Now, when a user logs on to my Linux server and access a Samba share, in the log file for that machine there is always a message repeated twice: [2005/03/16 05:40:23, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused As

2011/10/26 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote: >> >> > Christian, have you tweaked those settings in your ceph.conf?  It would be >> >> > something like ''journal dio = false''.  If not, can you verify that >> >> > directio shows true when the journal is initialized from your osd log?

Hi, Is there a simple way to set up Samba so that users ONLY see the shares that belong to them? I'm not talking about the user's HOME directory. But lets say I have 60 shares in my smb.conf file. To make it less confusing for users when they access the Samba server from Windows, I want the users to ONLY see the shares that belong to them. So, I want to set up each share so that

Can somebody tell me how to get samba to ask me for a username and password when I click on my Samba server in Windows XP Explorer? When I click on another computer on the network (Workstation A) from a workstation (Workstation B) where I'm NOT logged in with a username:password that Workstation A recognizes as having an account, I get a dialog box asking me for a username and password.

Hi, I have a weird problem with a Linux Server acting as a PDC with Samba 3.02. If I map a particular Samba share as the "Z" drive -- and I use roaming profiles with a logon.bat script -- the share will NEVER automatically reconnect when logging on again. This happens 100 percent of the time. And now the same thing seems to be happening for any shared mapped as the

I have Samba 3.0.0 installed on Mandrake 9.2. I also have Samba 2.8.8a installed per instructions from Mandrake -- but I do NOT start Samba 2.8.8a automatically. In fact, I don't use it at all. Maybe I should uninstall the Samba 2.8.8a rpm??? I will update to 3.0.1 as soon as an rpm is available from Mandrake. Anyway, I have a problem when I try to add a new share to my smb.conf file. I

Does somebody know if the Samba Client in MAC OS X (10.3.4 and 10.3.5) has problems looking at Linux-based Samba shares that are larger than 2 TB? I have Samba 3.0.2 running on my Linux box. I have never had any difficulty with the Mac seeing a 2 TB RAID array on the Linux box, but when the Mac looks at the 4 TB array, it can see all the contents and create folders but it can't create

Begin forwarded message: > From: Kimball Larsen <kimball at miridiatech.com> > Date: February 2, 2010 7:58:49 PM MST > To: Andy Liebman <andyliebman at aol.com> > Subject: Re: [Samba] OS X Clients Can't Create Sub-Directories > > > On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Andy Liebman wrote: > >> >> Kimball Larsen wrote: >>> I'm running

Hi, I'm setting up a Linux machine to use as a file server for a small group of windows machines. Like many of the folks who write to this list, I'm having all kinds of difficults getting the Windows machines to be able to access the Linux shares. In my case, the most frustrating thing is that all of my Windows machines and users can access the Linux shares SOMETIMES. But

Hi, Does anybody know why Windows clients can see shares that are defined by the "include=/etc/samba/smb.%U.conf" option in but Mac OS X and Linux Samba clients cannot see those shares? In other words, I have a bunch of users. Each user has a set of his/her own unique shares on my Linux server that are defined in files called: /etc/samba/smb.User1.conf /etc/samba/smb.User2.conf