similar to: Problems joining a domain with a large number of DCs

We have a SAMBA built from source code, and we want to enable offline bit in SAMBA, Can anybody can give some advices on this? Thanks. Vincent

What is the process for integrating a Lustre+SAMFS solution into an existing customer environment. The plan is to have CRS build the Lustre component, but Lustre and SAMFS will need to configured and integrated into the customer computing environment. I am very familiar with the SAMFS integration, but not Lustre integration. Do we have resources in PS to provide the integration? Is this

I have samba server joined to a domain that I'm trying to use ads security and acls on. I can set acls on the Unix file system, and access from a windows client seems to honor them. I can't view the acls under the security tab, all I see are the standard Unix permissions instead. If I try to add an entry to the acl, I get an access denied error, even if the user is on the list of admin

I've got a samba install on Linux with winbind installed, etc. I've configured it the same as I have under Solaris, but for some reason, I can't chown a file to an AD username. I have joined the box to the domain, I can wbinfo -u/-g and get lists of users and groups on the domain. When I run getent passwd or getent group, however, I don't see any of the domain users and groups.

Hello, we use Samba on a Solaris server with SamFS and a tape library for having access to the SamFS for Windows users. We used Norton Ghost to create backup images of our workstations and sent them via network to the Solaris server. Restoring these images often failed because of "corrupted" image files. We thought Norton Ghost might be the problem but another backup software,

The smbpasswd on my PDC (Solaris 9, Samba 3.026a) will truncate or corrupt passwords over 8 chars. The smbpasswd command on the linux clients (Samba 3.024a) is OK. Anyone know if this is a samba version issue or something solaris specific. Thanks

I've got a relatively simple permissions scheme I need to implement, and I'm having issues with group membership. I have a share that I need to grant an active directory group full control to. If I add an AD user to the ACL on the directory that is the root of the share, the user can access it. If I add an AD group to the ACL on that same directory, group members cannot access the

Hello, I've a share with preset permissions on different directories including acls. So in one folder for example users can only read and into other read and write. Everything works fine. The Problem is if one user decides to change the permission of a file or directory (via Windows) the acls and permissions get are messed up. How can I restrict users from changing permission on a share? I

Ilio Fornasero writes: > Yet, I am at this point. > > > > > ## 01. Finding the dataverse server and making a search > Sys.setenv("DATAVERSE_SERVER" =3D "dataverse.harvard.edu") > dataverse_search(".Hunger") > > > ## 02. Loading the dataset (in this example, I have chosen the word ".Hunge= > r" to get > # one list and

Hi all, I am trying to traverse a dominator tree and have encountered a weird runtime exception: Here's my simple code: virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) { DominatorTree& DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); * DomTreeNode* rootNode = DT.getRootNode();* return false. } Here's the documentation page:

On 4/11/13 10:30 PM, Bill He wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to traverse a dominator tree and have encountered a weird > runtime exception: > > Here's my simple code: > > virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F) { > DominatorTree& DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>(); > > * DomTreeNode* rootNode = DT.getRootNode();* > return false.

Guys I was so frustrated about installing samba with ADS and winbind support on solaris 8. After fixing many problems, I am now facing another problem: I created a directory "test" in the samba share and was editing a file under the directory "test" and in the meantime the machine was rebooted. After the machine is started, the whole directory "test" is gone. I

On 4/12/13 9:51 AM, Bill He wrote: > Thanks for your reply, John. > > I am using opt to run my pass. Should opt by default link in the > library? Would you please give me some idea on fixing it? Thanks! Odd. I would think that opt would have that pass linked in statically. I'm not sure why it's not working. Does anyone else have an idea? -- John T. > > opt -load

Thanks for your reply, John. I am using opt to run my pass. Should opt by default link in the library? Would you please give me some idea on fixing it? Thanks! opt -load ../../../Debug+Asserts/lib/LLVMHello.dylib -hello < hello.bc > /dev/null My pass is just: #include "llvm/IR/Function.h" #include "llvm/Pass.h" #include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h" #include

Hi Weibo, I thought would be more efficient discussing here (I just saw that every info was replicated on both emails you were sending to me). I just run your example here on my working machine, and I didn't have any issues with the namespace. Just tell me one thing: which line (and flags) are you using when configuring and make your build llvm directory? Oh, and one more thing: what is on

Hi list, I''ve did some tests and run into a very strange situation.. I created a zvol using "zfs create -V" and initialize an sam-filesystem on this zvol. After that I restored some testdata using a dump from another system. So far so good. After some big troubles I found out that releasing files in the sam-filesystem doesn''t create space on the underlying zvol.

Sorry, couldn't resist... From: Gabor Grothendieck > > ov$vn1 is not a variable. It is the result of applying the $ > function to the ov and vn1 arguments. ... which would suggest: get("$")(get("ov"), "vn1"). 8-) Andy > For example, using BOD which is a data frame that comes with > R, rather than get("BOD$Time") use

Hi All: When I use samfs, sometimes I got the following messages, Mr. Google says this is because the windows client use the share, and the connection is "reconnected"! Does it right? How to ward off the error? Is there any potential problem if I ignore it? My actions are smbmount and smbumount some shares. Sometimes some shares are smbumount before they mounted (thus cause a

Hello samba people I do not know if it is a bug, but a problem indeed: we have a Sun running solaris 2.7 samba 2.0.6) and NT clients AND a HSM Filesystem called samfs. This keeps data on tapes, and 16kB on disk. A client request a file can leed into grabbing a tape and bring back the data online to disk. 1) NFS Client waits for data until it's coming, even 1 day 2) (NT)/smbclient gets 16k

The subject says it all.