similar to: processes not closing

I have 2 machines in a cluster using GFS, that many client mount up via nfs. We use quotas extensively here, is there a way from a client machine to check a users quota? Standard quota command on client machines do not work like they do when checking a non-gfs nfs mounted file system. The quotas do work however, when a user exceeds quota and tries to write a file, it tell them that quota has

Folks I have a laptop which i am using temporarily as a test server. It is permanently plugged in. It is running Centos 6, command line only. In the past, I could close the lid, thereby turning off the display, but not turning off the machine. It remained running indefinitely. A recent update (this past week) changed that behavior. Now, when I close the lid, the laptop turns itself off

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2886 Bug ID: 2886 Summary: ssh-copy-id appears to hang indefinitely when ssh multiplexing is enabled, and it permits passwordless login Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW

Dear List, I'm using glmulti for model averaging in R. There are ~10 variables in my model, making exhaustive screening impractical - I therefore need to use the genetic algorithm (GA) (call: method = "g"). I need to include random effects so I'm using glmulti as a wrapper for lme4. Methods for doing this are available here

I have 2 samba servers. One with centos5+samba 3.033 that has been in service for a few years now. I have installed a centos6+samba 3.6.9. I followed the how-to I did with the first one, copied over the krb5.conf and smb.conf from the working server and all seemed to go well. It is a member server of a window AD. We have 2 DC's that are part of the same forest: SEAS and SEAS-S. I

On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> Security is *always* opposed to convenience. > False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come > from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant > security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is

At 07:16 AM 3/2/2017, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 02.03.2017 um 16:08 schrieb david <david at daku.org>: > > > > Folks > > > > I have a laptop which i am using temporarily as a test > server. It is permanently plugged in. It is running Centos 6, > command line only. In the past, I could close the lid, thereby > turning off the display, but not

This is the 2nd time this has happened to me. There was a kernel release over the weekend to .67.0.15, yet, they did not release the updated GFS to go along with it, so when the machine rebooted, there was no gfs file system in the new running kernel which in turn wreaked havoc on my cluster. I truly wish they would not do that :). I guess I shall have to not allow automatic yum updates from

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nuno Lopes" <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>, "Sanjoy Das" <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>, "Jeremy > Lakeman" <Jeremy.Lakeman at gmail.com>, nlewycky at google.com >

Hello -- I would like to setup a system where a user can generate a "ticket". This ticket will be stored indefinitely. The ticket will be sent to someone who does not have an account on the system and therefore, I would like to ensure some level of security in that ticket number. Basically, the other user would receive an email like: --- Please click on the link below to view this

Question 1: Is there a way to keep an authentication to a Samba share from lasting indefinitely? I am implementing a Linux file server for a network of machines all running Windows 98 SE. (Redhat 9, Samba 2.2.7a, share-level security.) Once a user provides a valid password and connects to a Samba share, Samba allows that client machine to access that share indefinitely. In our office each

...If you like the majority of us as I am...there is something we can do for the centos scene that really doesn't cost anything. When you download the distro...just let bittorrent seed indefinitely. By doing this you are contributing to centos as a whole. ...go figure...I'm actually giving the centos cause 17-18 KB/s and the beauty...I don't even miss it! My boxes run 24/7 anyway so

OpenSSH uses its own CTR mode implementation, correct? ?I seem to recall some discussion about why it hasn't/won't switch over to using OpenSSL's implementation, but I can't find the thread anymore. So... why doesn't OpenSSH use OpenSSL's CTR mode implementation? Thanks.

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:39:27AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:30:00PM +0100, Marc JIROU wrote: > > > > So no one is interesting in having symbolic link on a samba server ? > > > > When i was looking for informations, most of people think that symbolic > > link are > > reserved to NTFS and can't exists on a smb server,

I''m having a problem with the boot sequence hanging indefinitely at "stopping system V runlevel compatibility". Here are the steps I took to get to this point: 1) installed a single boot, server version of ubuntu 11.10 (intended to be dom0) 2) apt-get install xen-hypervisor-4.1-amd64 xen-utils-4.1 xenwatch xen-tools xen-utils-common xenstore-utils 3) updated grub as follows: -

Hello group, this issue is driving me crazy, there just has to be a simple way to do this that I am missing! I have a share, SOP. The file system maps to /dir/dir/sop. If I have a set of users that need write access to this directory, but only want to allow another set of users read only access, how can I accomplish this? From the man pages, it looks like I can set the share to read only, and

+1--this is the single most-annoying issue with R that I know of. My usual solution, after accomplishing nothing as R spins idly for a couple hours, is to kill the process and lose any un-saved work. save.history() is my friend, but is a big delay when you work with big data sets as I do, so I don't run it after every command. I have cc'd r-help here, however, because I experience this

I'm increasingly getting to be of the opinion that the current timeout behaviour of the menu system is ridiculous. I did it this way because someone on this list had expressed concern that serial port glitches would trigger a character which then would cause the thing to sit indefinitely. Well, first of all, such an automatic system would hardly use the menu system, and second of all, I

Hello, I've been unable to connect to a remote host from within my network using the following argument. virsh/virt-manager -c qemu+ssh://user@host:port/system I've tried libssh & libssh2 as well. Using ssh just prompts me for the host password indefinitely. When using libssh2 the connection is rejected. The host computer is using a custom ssh port which I've added to the above

> On 2014-Jul-31, at 10:07, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: >> Hold on, I'm still not sure what kind of guarantees (restrictions) the C >> API imposes. >> >> If I implement (2), then -verify will fail if someone (e.g.) adds >>