similar to: primary group

Dear all May be this question asked earlier in list but i didn't able to search exact . I have samba+ldap domain setup on RHEL 5.1 and samba version is 3.0.28. Today i got a windows 7 system , but i am not able to join that system in our samba+ldap domain. Do i need to do any registry tweaking. I can't upgrade own samba version beyond 3.0.33 because this maximum version i get if i update

Dear friends My domain users in two diffrent OU, one OU is TEMP_USERS and other OU is PEOPLE. What i should mention in smb.conf ? If i mention ldap user suffix = ou=PEOPLE, then users of ou TEMP_USERS is not able to authenticate. Please guide me. Thanks -- http://linuxinterviews.blogspot.com

dear all I am using samba 3.0.28 on RHEl 5.2. I am using samba with winbind that authenticate window 2003 domain. From last few months samba was running properly. But today samba server performance badly, even sometime mapped drive on xp disappear. When i tried to connect samba shares, error appear server not available. Anyone suggest me what may be the problem. Why samba performance

My previous email on this topic get no answer, i try to explain me better. The problem. Simply i was (ab)used, in my previous samba NT-mode domains, to have file created with the group-owner as the UNIX primary group; now, in AD, files get created group-owned by Windows primary group, eg 'Domain Users'. This simply 'breaks' most of my ACLs setup. I've read:

Dear All I needed to clone my disk to another hard drive . I did it as the following : #dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/sdc But after a while, the procedure ended with the "writing to /dev/sdc input/output error" message. Can you please let me know how can I overcome this as the fdisk now returns as " #fdisk /dev/sdc "I do not know how to handle files with mode 81a4 must set

Dear all My server running samba 3.0.28 on RHEL 5.2 . Samba acting as File Server using winbind to authenticate AD users. Following messages repeatedly generated in /var/log/messages by samba ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dec 30 09:48:37 abpdel2 smbd[10945]: [2008/12/30 09:48:37, 0]

Hi, I find that files (not directories) in an smbfs-mounted share always have the sgid bit set. I've looked in the FAQ and HOWTO but didn't see anything. I wonder if someone might suggest a way to fix it. The share is served from Windows 2003 SP2 and mounted on a Fedora 10 Linux machine (samba-client-3.2.5-0.23.fc10.i386) with this command line: mount //wcl-fp1/shared /mnt/shared -t

Timo, I did further study of the user/group permissions. Applying the below patch will make no difference to virtually everyone out there. Those that have default uid/gid ownership won't see any change as the gid already matches so the fchown() action won't be attempted. Those that have sgid will still see the normal expected fchown() enforced by the kernel which becomes a duplicated

Dear developers, I discovered that directories created by scp when recursive copying into a sgid directory do not inherit the sgid bit. I believe this is a bug. A patch to fix this is attached. Regards, Petr Skovron -------------- next part -------------- --- scp.c.orig 2005-10-11 16:50:17.000000000 +0200 +++ scp.c 2005-10-11 16:57:25.000000000 +0200 @@ -876,8 +876,12 @@

What are you using for the database - SQLite? I am using mysql (mariadb). I am not familiar with SQLlite. Can you access the database from the console - look up the list of tables - display the contents from a table? Anything to see if your SQLite is working and has asterisk data in it. From your Asterisk console, |CLI> core show help database| should give you a list of commands that you

Ok, I was able to fix both of my problems and they are both related to SELinux problems First: I am assuming that you are like me and that you have an excellent background in systems administration (I teach it at a university for a living.) So you've configured chmod permissions and chown user and group ownerships on directories and files to correctly allow the desired access. You have

On 05/02/2020 11:39, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > My previous email on this topic get no answer, i try to explain me > better. > > > The problem. > > Simply i was (ab)used, in my previous samba NT-mode domains, to have > file created with the group-owner as the UNIX primary group; now, in > AD, files get created group-owned by Windows primary group, eg 'Domain

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 2:38 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So '5035' is a computer, but what is '3000011' ? > You can find out by running this on the DC: > ldbsearch -H /path/to/idmap.ldb '(&(objectClass=sidMap)(xidNumber=3000011))' =================================== # ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/idmap.ldb

Hello, we use the SGID bit on Solaris for directories to force setting the given group from the directories above (not the primary group). If we create directories with Samba 2.0.7, the SGID bit will not set on the new directory. With Samba 2.0.6 and below all worked fine. Is there a work around or a bug fix available? Thx Sincerly yours Jochen Duemmel PS: we use Samba for a server

I tried this. When im creating a folder directly on server, the sticky bit is working. But it does not work when im doing it from windows. # ls -l drwxrws---+ 7 root stickygroup 4096 Mär 5 14:44 00_stickygroup/ Best regards Micha Am 05.03.2018 um 14:15 schrieb Michael Wandel: > IMHO you can use the posix sgid bit.

Apache DocumentRoot on an NFS directory: [root at localhost ~]# service httpd start Starting httpd: Warning: DocumentRoot [/home/www/html] does not exist Syntax error on line 292 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: DocumentRoot must be a directory [FAILED] [root at localhost ~]# After some research, I found this (dated) link

Hi, I have this webroot /webdir/ with 2775 permission so that any created file/directory by apache inside of /webdir/ will be 'users:webusers'. However, I noticed when the apache created a new files (fileB) / directories (dirB), the ownership becomes 'apache:apache' and the sgid has gone for /webdir/ (drwxrwxr-x). I'm currently using Wordpress. [before] drwxrwsr-x users

Hi everyone, We are a longtime samba/win desktop shop but are getting more Macs. Samba sernet rpms 3.3.9 on CentOS 5.4 test box (started to test 3.43 but will wait) and I confirmed a problem I have been having in production. Server is ADS member with ldap stored idmap. All AD auth and idmap are identical to production servers and have been working fine for years. Filesystem is XFS and there are

Hi, how do I allow lighttpd access to a directory like this: dr-xrwxr-x. lighttpd example unconfined_u:object_r:samba_share_t:s0 files_articles I tried to create and install a selinux module, and it didn?t work. The non-working module can not be removed, either: semodule -r lighttpd-files_articles.pp libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove_key: Unable to remove module lighttpd-files_articles.pp at

PS: Now I found this: type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : proctitle=/usr/lib/sendmail -t -oi -oem -fwawi-genimp type=SYSCALL msg=audit(09/22/2017 12:08:29.911:1023) : arch=x86_64 syscall=setgroups success=no exit=EPERM(Operation not permitted) a0=0x1 a1=0x7ffc1df3b0d0 a2=0x0 a3=0x7f5d77c3a300 items=0 ppid=19417 pid=19418 auid=unset uid=lighttpd gid=lighttpd euid=root