similar to: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c)

Hi all, I have a Windows 2003sp2 domain with a few Samba 3.0 member servers. This domain services about 700 XP PCs distributed across 15 or so subnets. On one particular subnet there are about 300 PCs, 2 or 3 2003 member servers and a samba 3.0.28 member server (solaris). When/if the samba server picks up the local master browser role, it will cause the domain master browser to crash after a

Hi, We have a large (8 CPUs, 32GB RAM) x86 Sun server running x8664 Debian Lenny, with Samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny6. It's a BDC and file server. I have noticed various entries in the log files that I'd like to understand better. Some machines are generating this: [2009/11/16 15:10:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2019) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x9005c): Currently not implemented.

I'm trying to create a DFS root in my 2003 AD domain, and point it to a share hosted on a Samba server. From the documentation, I had assumed that this was supported (msdfs host = yes ?). Am I missing something basic? This is with Samba 3.0.31 on RHEL 5. When I go to create the DFS root (via the msc plugin) and instruct it to use my samba machine as the host, I get this error: "The

Hello, We use undi_drv.exe that is provided with Symantec Ghost Enterprise. This driver loads a UNDI PXE stack into memory. It, along with a UNDI packet driver are bundled into a 1.44MB disk image that we use for netbooting computer lab machines into the ghost client. This is done with pxelinux. This driver has been working fine for a couple years now. Recently, I upgraded the pxelinux.0 to

I think the message title says it all. I was attempting to do 'make test' against 3.0.23d and include the smbtorture4 tests from 4.0.0tp3 (as I read somewhere to be a good idea). Is there any reason that the test should not work? Does it have something to do with the 'unknown parameter'? Make test works fine without smbtorture4. Platform is Solaris 9 on sun4u. Samba 4 was

Hopefully some one can help me wit this. I run ubuntu 8.04 server 64 bit edition as a local file and print server. I use samba to act as an NT server for 6 XP pro clients running MS Access database. In my log files I consitanty have the following error which seems to occur when there is more that one user accessing the database: Feb 27 11:36:24 fileserver smbd[11192]: [2010/02/27 11:36:24,

Hi all! First off, if this has been discussed, please point me in that direction. I have searched high and low and really can''t find much info on the subject. We have a large-ish (200gb) UFS file system on a Sun Enterprise 250 that is being shared with samba (lots of files, mostly random IO). OS is Solaris 10u3. Disk set is 7x36gb 10k scsi, 4 internal 3 external. For several

Hi William, I got no positive reply since I made my posting. Only you and another guy, who made the same experience. No answer to the question, what functionality has "call_nt_transact_ioctl" and what effect on SAMBA has the missing of this procedure. Sorry, Michael William Soudan schrieb: > Hi Michael, > > I'm getting the same message in our samba logfiles as you

Hello, we run samba 2.0.6 on Solaris2.6 and use it together with clearcase (version 3.2.1). Sometimes the checkout of files from a clearcase NT-client hangs and probably causes clearcase to destroy the viewstore. In the samba logfile of that client I found the following message: [2000/02/17 09:29:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not

Hi All, I'm experiencing some really funky Samba errors, and I'm hoping that some of you might have some ideas. This only happens sporadically, and when it does, I loose Samba connectivity for a while. Here are my Samba logs: Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]: [2004/06/02 13:29:01, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2076) Jun 2 13:29:01 nasone smbd[20289]:

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for

As I posted to samba@samba.org one month ago, we found the same error as Chuck Thier (smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2401) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented.) as a possible reason for some crashes of ClearCase clients on WindowsNT (we use Samba 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6 and ClearCase 3.2.1). Therefore I support his wish, that this functionality should be implemented in samba

Dear useRs, We are pleased to announce the preliminary release of the IPSUR package. The primary audience was originally envisioned to be upper division undergraduate mathematics/statistics/engineering majors, but other useRs may find this material useful. In a nutshell, this package slightly modifies and adds selected functionality to the R Commander by John Fox. The changes were meant to

Dear useRs, We are pleased to announce the preliminary release of the IPSUR package. The primary audience was originally envisioned to be upper division undergraduate mathematics/statistics/engineering majors, but other useRs may find this material useful. In a nutshell, this package slightly modifies and adds selected functionality to the R Commander by John Fox. The changes were meant to

Hi everybody I'm actually facing some strange messages in smb logs: our samba server is running fine but I can see a lot of this message in the log : Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: [2009/04/27 13:33:53, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2029) Apr 27 13:33:53 lnx-ds01 smbd[18773]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90060): Currently not implemented. after sometime (one hour, one

Hello, I have been interested in setdiff() for data frames that operates row-wise. I looked in the documentation, mailing lists, etc., and didn't find exactly the right thing. Given data frames A, B with the same columns, the goal is to extract the rows that are in A, but not in B. Of course, one can usually do setdiff(rownames(A), rownames(B)) but that is cheating. :-) I played around a

Thanks to Jay Kerns and Jim Lemon for their help. It's exactly what I wanted and "aggregate" is very efficient even with a huge data. Thanks "G. Jay Kerns" <gkerns@ysu.edu> a écrit : Hi Louis, If I am understanding your question correctly, here is one way: suppose your matrix is M of dimension n x k. D <- data.frame(M) # convert to data frame ones <- rep(1,

Dear R-help, Suppose I write a script that looks something like this: #### script.R set.seed(something) x <- rnorm(100) y <- runif(500) # bunch of other stuff save.image() ### end of script.R Now, I give you a copy of my script.R (with the set.seed statement removed, of course) together with the .RData file that was generated by the save.image() command. Question: 1) can you tell

Dear R Community, I am pleased to announce the beta-release of the prob package. The source code is now on CRAN, and binaries should be generated there before long. In the meantime, you can get it with install.packages("prob", repos = "http://r-forge.r-project.org") The prob package gives a framework for doing elementary probability on finite sample spaces in R. The

Dear R Community, I am pleased to announce the beta-release of the prob package. The source code is now on CRAN, and binaries should be generated there before long. In the meantime, you can get it with install.packages("prob", repos = "http://r-forge.r-project.org") The prob package gives a framework for doing elementary probability on finite sample spaces in R. The