similar to: Samba+LDAP: Vista clients logging out upon logon

Here is a second, somewhat related question to my last one. When looking over the network trace I have ran into something I cannot explain. It may be quite proper, in which case I am misreading the trace. But I would appreciate it if someone would explain this to me. In packet 109 of the trace (during a login with no profile on the server), I see a "NT Create AndX request"

Sorry to hop on an existing conversation but this seemed like a good point to jump in with this question. Say I have a service account, with a random password that is set to never expire. What component is expected to periodically renew (or request anew) the Kerberos TGT using that password? I see lots of information about SSSD handling this, but less so with Samba. Also, I understand that in

I know this is an old thread, but since I ran into this problem and spun my wheels on it for a few hours, I want to point out something subtle in this thread I missed: You must use the pre-compiled binaries in the tarball for this to work. I downloaded the tarball for syslinux 6.03 release and also tried 6.04-pre and 6.03-pre7, and did a make, and the resulting EFI binary still exhibited the

gcc-4.6.real (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 Regards, Terry On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > On 10/04/16 14:48, Terry Hardie via Syslinux wrote: >> I know this is an old thread, but since I ran into this problem and spun my >> wheels on it for a few hours, I want to point out something

On 1/29/2015 7:21 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: > [root at localhost ~]# lspci | grep RAID > 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS-3 > 3108 [Invader] (rev 02) to get info out of those, you need to install MegaCli64 from LSI Logic, which has the ugliest command lines and output you've ever seen. I use the python script below, which I put in

On 2/16/2016 3:23 PM, Zube wrote: > Does anyone know what program can be used to query the RAID status > from the OS for an on-board LSI SAS 2308-4i? the 2308 isn't actually a megaraid, its a simple SAS HBA that has an optional raid mode IF its flashed with IR firmware... this only supports raid 0/1/10. I always(!) flash these with the IT firmware that turns them back into a

On 1/30/2015 9:44 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/29/2015 7:21 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> [root at localhost ~]# lspci | grep RAID >> 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS-3 >> 3108 [Invader] (rev 02) > > to get info out of those, you need to install MegaCli64 from LSI > Logic, which has the ugliest command lines and output you've

That's what I'm failing with. What version of GCC works? On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > I've only had failures on gcc-4.6 with EFI builds. > > > On Oct 5, 2016 4:03 PM, "Terry Hardie via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> > wrote: >> >> gcc-4.6.real (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hello, Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). Miloslav> May I ask you

The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you have the latest firmware. On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav H?la wrote: Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1

>>>>> "Miloslav" == Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> writes: Miloslav> Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Me too... please look for further comments. Esp about 'fio' and Netapp useage. Miloslav> Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): Miloslav> Hello, Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs

On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: > disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up > End of Output ************************** > > Let me know if i need to

Thank you. It is clear now, so it was user error and I should read more documentation :) Unfortunately drag and drop isn't working. Is there any prerequisite? My host is FC20 and guest is Win2k8 server Thank you Vlad On Thu 20 Mar 2014 05:42:40 PM CET, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Laszlo Pal (private)" <vlad@vlad.hu> >>

Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline... Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a): > Miloslav> Hello, > Miloslav> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: > Miloslav> "RAID-1 would be preferable" > Miloslav> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). >

On 10/04/16 14:48, Terry Hardie via Syslinux wrote: > I know this is an old thread, but since I ran into this problem and spun my > wheels on it for a few hours, I want to point out something subtle in this > thread I missed: > > You must use the pre-compiled binaries in the tarball for this to work. > > I downloaded the tarball for syslinux 6.03 release and also tried

I've only had failures on gcc-4.6 with EFI builds. On Oct 5, 2016 4:03 PM, "Terry Hardie via Syslinux" <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > gcc-4.6.real (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3 > GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 > > Regards, > > Terry > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 6:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> wrote: > > On 10/04/16

Hi Larry, Thanks so much! This seems to do the trick. I would have spun my wheels for > a long time before discovering all of this, wow. No worries. :) I'll try to keep this in mind and make sure I address it in future Kaleidoscope tutorial chapters - these issues tripped me up the first time I encountered them too. Do I even want to know what additional chickens need to be sacrificed

Hello, I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you for the comments as from people around the Dovecot? We are using btrfs RAID-10 (/data, 4.7TB) on a physical Supermicro server with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @

On 2/2/2015 10:32 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/1/2015 8:25 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> >> On 2/2/2015 9:25 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >>> On 2/1/2015 7:31 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: >>>> >>>> I ran your script and here is the output for it: >>>> >>>> Start of the Output*************************** >>>> [root at localhost

On 2/3/2015 10:00 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/2/2015 8:11 PM, Jatin Davey wrote: >> disk 252:1 | 0-0-0 | 9XG7TNQVST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up >> disk 252:2 | 0-0-1 | 9XG4M4X3ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up >> disk 252:3 | 0-1-1 | 9XG4LY7JST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up >> disk 252:4 | 0-1-0 | 9XG51233ST91000640NS CC03 | Online, Spun Up >> End of