similar to: Slow Samba writes over NFS

Hello... Currently in the process of upgrading Samba v2.0.10 to Samba v3.0.x, while conducting some minimal testing, it turns-out that Samba v3.0.x is performing slower than Samba v2.0.10. Set-ups: A. Samba v3.0.x --> Same PC client is accessing the samba share running on Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP DL380) which in turn has an NFS mount coming from another SAN attached Red Hat 4.5 (64bit, HP

Hi, I was doing updates on a server and I think that the network connection got reset. So I guess the yum update didn't complete and I now get this when I run 'yum update': ======================= Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz.sig Looks like v2.0.10 was a bit troublesome release. I expect this one to last longer. * dotlock_use_excl setting's default was accidentally "no" in all v2.0.x releases, instead of "yes" as in v1.1 and v1.2. Changed it back to "yes". - v2.0.10:

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.11.tar.gz.sig Looks like v2.0.10 was a bit troublesome release. I expect this one to last longer. * dotlock_use_excl setting's default was accidentally "no" in all v2.0.x releases, instead of "yes" as in v1.1 and v1.2. Changed it back to "yes". - v2.0.10:

CentOS 5.1 - I have already executed 'yum clean all' but the error persists. What could be the problem? $ yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment" Loading "installonlyn" plugin Setting up Group Process Setting up repositories Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Package gnome-panel - 2.16.1-6.el5.i386 already installed and latest

We are running Solaris 10 11/06 on a Sun V240 with 2 CPUS and 8 GB of memory. This V240 is attached to a 3510 FC that has 12 x 300 GB disks. The 3510 is configured as HW RAID 5 with 10 disks and 2 spares and it''s exported to the V240 as a single LUN. We create iso images of our product in the following way (high-level): # mkfile 3g /isoimages/myiso # lofiadm -a /isoimages/myiso

Hi all I don't have the full Centos 4 CD distro, only the minimal server one (single CD). I use whitebox 4 for desktop installs and then change the necessary files whitebox-release, diskdumputils, yum etc. & change it to centos...never had a problem. This time however, I don't know why, but I chose the "Everything" option in the package selection dialog during install. Post

Hi Gabriel, > I am having some issues with CentOS 5. [cut] > I am running a clean install of CentOS 5 i386 on a Dell Inspiron 6400 > (Core Due, 1GB RAM) with SELinux on "enforcing". I've just received my new 6400 (T7400, 2GB, 160GB, Vista Home Premium) and I'd like to install CentOS 5 too. With big surprise (looking at the partition table first and then, googling,

I have several years of experience running Samba on Solaris. We only use Samba to permit data transfer between the Sun server and users running PCs by means of transferring files. We currently have a Sun V240 running Solaris 8 and samba with no problems. We also have a Sun M3000 running Solaris 10 and Samba with no problems. I am trying to configure a new Oracle T4-1 server to run Samba.

I am in the process of planning for a samba upgrade. The current version of Samba (2.2.8a) runs on a Sunfire 280R with Solaris 8. The intended new platform is a sunfire V240 with Solaris 9 as the OS. The new version of Samba will be Samba-3.0.10. Please note that the Samba server will be a member of a domain. I've read Samba-3 by Example, Chapter 8 which describes to the process of updating

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz.sig Many small fixes, plus some more noticeable: + doveadm: Added "move" command for moving mails between mailboxes. + virtual: Added support for "+mailbox" entries that clear \Recent flag from messages (default is to preserve them). - dbox: Fixes to handling

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.12.tar.gz.sig Many small fixes, plus some more noticeable: + doveadm: Added "move" command for moving mails between mailboxes. + virtual: Added support for "+mailbox" entries that clear \Recent flag from messages (default is to preserve them). - dbox: Fixes to handling

Currently, my time server is a Sun v240 with a 32-pci gps card (with a proprietary Solaris driver) attached to our gps receiver via an sma cable up to the roof of my building. As I'm migrating almost all of our Solaris servers and services over to CentOS, I'd like to know what other people are using for time server hardware. Any suggestions? -- Andy Harrison public key: 0x67518262

My LAN is running Samba v2.0.10 on RedHat Linux v7.1 and everything is running great. Not content to leave well enough alone, we will soon be converting all the Win98 clients to Win2K. What kind of Samba-related difficulties, if any, should I expect? Samba exports both shared drives and printers to the client machine on the Network. Client machines are given access to their home drives as

Hi, I have used lmbench to test the performance of Xenolinux (HVM) CPU: Intel (R) Core (TM)2 T7400@2.16GHz Memory size: 1GB NIC: Intel PCIe Gigabit LAN chip HD: Samsung 80GB/7200rpm/8M Dom0: 2.6.19-1.2911.6.5.fc6xen DomU: 2.6.20-1.2944.fc6 The context switch time seems saturated along with increasement of processes? e.g. size of processes 64kB N=number of process t=context switch time when

Hello, I recently updated to R 2.10 on my 64 bit Dell Precision T7400 running Enterprise Linux and now I can't get the arm library to load when I run R using Wine. Prior to the update I was able to use arm without any trouble. My main goal is to use arm with WinBUGS on this machine, calling it from R for Windows, which is executed with wine. After the update, when I try to load the arm

using openssh-3.8.1p1 from sunfreeware.com on a SunOS XXX 5.8 Generic_117000-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240. sshd seems to ignore or miss SIGCLD. this is a rare behaviour we observe about once per week in a ssh intensive environment. the process hangs here: truss: 24453: poll(0xFFBEEF28, 2, -1) (sleeping...) gcore, mdb: libc.so.1`_poll+4(b, 0, 0, ffbeef38, 6fc40,

IHAC that is asking the following. any thoughts would be appreciated Take two drives, zpool to make a mirror. Remove a drive - and the server HANGS. Power off and reboot the server, and everything comes up cleanly. Take the same two drives (still Solaris 10). Install Veritas Volume Manager (4.1). Mirror the two drives. Remove a drive - everything is still running. Replace the drive, everything

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody, few weeks ago i asked how is it possible to fix common parameters for all VMs. There is a way by putting a script instead of HVM. Can you help me please on this ? I would like that all my VMs have stdvga forced instead of cirrus (i use libvirt and this parameter is not supported). What kind of script i can develop and how i can cal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi everybody, i can run windows nt properly under xen hvm. However when i use cirrus logic driver if i switch of screen size i have green or yellow flood. I tried to use stdvga but when i use it i have only 16bit color and only 800x600. What kind of driver can i use with stdvga ? regards, - -- Alexandre CABROL PERALES - -- Ingenieur Securite des