similar to: 3.2.2 : ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections

Hi all, I've got an ongoing battle with samba shipped with Sun Solaris 10 in it's current form (Samba version 3.0.28a) not wanting to talk to my OpenLDAP master correctly. Essentially, under certain conditions, this behaviour is observed, in the log.smbd: [2008/10/11 08:54:03, 1, pid=13610] libsmb/cliconnect.c:(1451) Error connecting to 192.168.117.150 (Connection refused)

On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote: > Hi people, > > the LinearScan register allocator tries to use same register for both > live intervals, if the new interval is defined by a register copy > whose destination reg is compatible with the source register. This is > ok. However, this "check for compatibility" is wrongly done IMHO. >

I am using some non-allocatable RegisterClasses to define lists of registers that are used for various non-allocation-related processing in the back end. For example, we have a post-allocation functional unit selection pass that is guided by the register assignment, which does things like 'myRegClass.contains(Reg)' to see if a register is in the set of registers accessible by a given unit.

Hi Jakob, >> Say I have regclass1 with reg A, and regclass2 with regs {A, B}, but >> regclass2 defines only "B" as allocatable by RA. > > The register allocator assumes in many places that a register is > either allocatable or reserved independently of the register class. Is there any reason for this? I mean, the methods for allowing one physical reg be

Hi! I've installed Solaris 10 x86 (Core2Duo - x64) server, with Samba over ZFS RAID-Z. Samba is a part of Active Directory Domain. I've managed to join it to domain, to get the users and groups from A.D. and to translate them to Unix IDs. Everything works really good. Samba is installed from the packages from Solaris 10 DVD. Only problem I have is the performance :( It's

Hi people, the LinearScan register allocator tries to use same register for both live intervals, if the new interval is defined by a register copy whose destination reg is compatible with the source register. This is ok. However, this "check for compatibility" is wrongly done IMHO. Say I have regclass1 with reg A, and regclass2 with regs {A, B}, but regclass2 defines only

I'm trying to setup a LVM mirror on 2 iSCS targets, but can't. I have added both /dev/sda & /dev/sdb to the LVM-RAID PV, and both have 500GB space. [root at HP-DL360 by-path]# pvscan PV /dev/cciss/c0d0p2 VG LVM lvm2 [136.59 GB / 2.69 GB free] PV /dev/sda VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [500.00 GB / 490.00 GB free] PV /dev/sdb VG LVM-RAID lvm2 [502.70 GB /

Hi Wonsun, can you please provide a testcase. Best wishes, Duncan. > I've noticed that LLVM does a bad job of optimizing array indexing > code for FORTRAN arrays declared using the ALLOCATABLE keyword. > > For example if you have something like the following: > > DOUBLE PRECISION,ALLOCATABLE,DIMENSION(:,:,:,:) :: QAV > ... > ALLOCATE( QAV(

I've noticed that LLVM does a bad job of optimizing array indexing code for FORTRAN arrays declared using the ALLOCATABLE keyword. For example if you have something like the following: DOUBLE PRECISION,ALLOCATABLE,DIMENSION(:,:,:,:) :: QAV ... ALLOCATE( QAV( -2:IMAX+2,-2:JMAX+2,-2:KMAX+2,ND) ) ... DO L = 1, 5 DO K = K1, K2 DO J = J1, J2 DO I = I1, I2 II = I +

This is getting real tough to debug. titan : Solaris 8 running samba 3.0.31 aequitas : OpenSolaris running samba 3.2.0 I can do basics test just fine : # /usr/xpg4/bin/date -u;/opt/csw/bin/findsmb Sat Jul 12 22:50:51 GMT 2008 *=DMB +=LMB IP ADDR NETBIOS NAME WORKGROUP/OS/VERSION

Thank you for your reply Eli, I too was working with Carey on this feature, so please let me reply. On 12/21/18 8:05 PM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev wrote: > As a side-note, you might want to check that prologue/epilogue emission won't emit a PUSH/POP that refers to a register reserved this way; we sometimes add an "extra" register to align the stack. Yes, you are right.

Hi all, This is a RFC on support for Global Register Variables in the Arm backend. Whilst there has been some prior discussion about whether or not LLVM should (or even needs to) support global register variables, today there seems to be a good measure of support for this in both Clang+LLVM (although it is currently limited to SP). When most of this support landed there was some concern

I just went through a BFU update to snv_127 on a V880 : neptune console login: root Password: Nov 3 08:19:12 neptune login: ROOT LOGIN /dev/console Last login: Mon Nov 2 16:40:36 on console Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_127 Nov. 02, 2009 SunOS Internal Development: root 2009-Nov-02 [onnv_127-tonic] bfu''ed from /build/archives-nightly-osol/sparc on 2009-11-03 I have [

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the RC stage. Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/dovecot-2.0.0.tar.gz.sig As promised last Friday, here's the v2.0.0 release finally. I'm cautiously optimistic that v2.0.1 won't (have to) be released for a few weeks, since there was quite a lot of testing and fixing going on in the RC stage. Remember to read http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.0

Hi, I'm still unable to compile samba 3.2.0 under Solaris 8. After removing the "bin/libtalloc.so.1" and "bin/libtdb.so.1" I get another error: "./librpc/gen_ndr/srvsvc.h", line 242: warning: enumerator value overflows INT_MAX (2147483647) "./librpc/gen_ndr/wkssvc.h", line 10: warning: useless declaration "./librpc/gen_ndr/samr.h", line 633:

Starting Dovecot Imap: Fatal: service(pop3-login) User doesn't exist: dovenull Just some real time feedback. I don't know what dovenull user is or why it is necessary.

I think Eli made a good point. In addition to that, if you are writing a OS kernel, I guess you are also writing a loader, so you can map anything as you want, no? On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:06 PM Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 12/3/2018 12:34 PM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev wrote: > > Context: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39862 >

Hey, I'm getting this error when ever I've written a file from my Win2k Pro machine to my samba share. Using Samba 2.2.3. Built on Solaris 8. Using winbindd. I created the sym links as suggested under /lib (really /usr/lib): nss_winbind.so.1 -> libnss_winbind.so nss_winbind.so.2 -> libnss_winbind.so Are there some other sim links I need somewhere or is this error something

The LIBS line at the top of the Makefile read: LIBS=-lsec -lgen -lresolv -lsocket -lnsl -ldl Is there somewhere else that I need to add -lsocket? David -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abartlet@pcug.org.au] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:22 PM To: David Edward Shapiro Cc: 'samba-technical@lists.samba.org'; 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: Re: