similar to: Authenticating Linux boxes against Active Directory, using Samba as a sort of AD Proxy

HI, I am trying to migrate from windows to linux. For that i am integrating existing windows 2003 R2 64 BIT standard edition running ADS with Redhat Directory Server 8.0 runnning on CENTOS5 for user/group and password sync.I followed the step given in centos wiki and i sucessfully synced the users but password sync is not happening.In passync log its telling* "unable to load password

Hi, I am trying to integrate RHDS 8.0 with windows 2003 ads on centos 5.1 as per the centos documentation for user/group and password sync from windows ADS. I am using windows sync and Passsync . But i am facing problem with the certificate creation. *########################################################################## Followed the below step in centos box runing rhds to setup ssl.*

From: Bryan J. Smith [mailto:thebs413 at earthlink.net] > > Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at BUC.com> wrote: > > It is an interesting choice. It supports multi-master > > replication which I will need and has some GUI management > > utilities. > > Anyone know of any problems with it? > > Only that many people on this list have been ignorant of what >

select() has a maximum value for the FDs it can monitor, and since the libguestfs library can be used in other applications, this limit may be hit by users in case lots of FDs are opened. As solution, switch to poll(): it has a slightly better interface to check what changed and for which FD, and it does not have a limit in the value of the FDs monitored. poll() is supported on the platforms we

On Wednesday, 26 February 2020 15:08:24 CET Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > > select() has a maximum value for the FDs it can monitor, and since > > the libguestfs library can be used in other applications, this limit > > may be hit by users in case lots of FDs are opened. > > > > As solution, switch to

Hi, I would like to submit the attached patch. It implements IO loop using FreeBSD's kqueue/kevent syscalls. It is based on snapshot of CVS HEAD as of 2005-12-12. I could only give it limited testing on FreeBSD 5.4 but it works fine so far. Vaclav Haisman -------------- next part -------------- diff -rN -u old-dovecot-cvs/autogen.sh new-dovecot-cvs/autogen.sh ---

Thanks Craig for your soon answer.. I've now the FDS up and running... I am now creating my users in FDS because I want to unify the authentication of my 3 centos servers. BUT, When I create my users in FDS I don't see any option of UID, GID, home directory, etc, so the FDS server return an error and my remote users can't authenticate....... my question is? 1. Can I use FDS to

The original implementation utilies select(). In Linux select() typically supports up to 1024 file descriptors. This can be a problem when user tries to boot up many guests. Switching to poll() has minimum impact on existing code and has better scalibility. Up to 8192 file descriptors are supported in the current implementation. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> ---

Using simple authentication I have been able to tie FDS to Samba 3.x.24. Knowing that the unix passwd and smb passwd are different, dare I ask how difficult it would be to have them sync? Most of my users are using netatalk w/ posix user info and MD5 password. I would like to swing this over to samba without the worries of two passwords per user. I have seen blips on this but not directly related

On 8/18/20 5:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > configure.ac | 1 + > common/replacements/Makefile.am | 2 + > common/replacements/poll.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++ > server/public.c | 2 +- > server/sockets.c | 2 +- > common/replacements/poll.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 6

The previous code: fcntl (fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) was technically incorrect, because it would have reset any other flags on the file descriptor. Thanks: Eric Blake --- bootstrap | 1 + daemon/inotify.c | 6 ++++-- lib/conn-socket.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- m4/.gitignore | 9 +++++++++ 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/bootstrap b/bootstrap

With this, I am finally able to get the nbd plugin to do out-of-order responses to the client. Once this series goes in, we should be ready for Rich to cut a release. Eric Blake (4): nbd: Split reading into separate thread nbd: Protect writes with mutex nbd: Enable parallel handling tests: Test parallel nbd behavior plugins/nbd/nbd.c | 217

v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-June/msg00014.html I pushed a few bits which are uncontroversial. The main changes since v1 are: An extra patch removes the want_to_send / check for nbd_aio_is_ready in examples/threaded-reads-and-writes.c. This logic was wrong since commit 6af72b87 as was pointed out by Eric in his review. Comments and structure of

Hi, I work for a small company that makes radar systems for research organisations and we use FreeBSD on the PCs for data acquisition and processing. We have recently shifted to FreeBSD6/amd64 and one machine in particular is exhibiting a strange problem. The acquisition process is a Tcl interpreter with a largish chunk of C code which talks to the hardware (via RS485 and a custom PCI card).

This is a major rewrite compared to my v1 series, where I've tried a lot harder to ensure that we still accommodate building on Haiku (although I have not actually yet fired up a Haiku VM to try it for myself). I also managed to make the sh plugin fully parallel, on capable platforms. See also my question on patch 10 on whether I've picked the best naming convention. Eric Blake (17):

By default FreeBSD 7.0 shipped with the sysctls set to: kern.maxfiles: 12328 kern.maxfilesperproc: 11095 We recently bumped up against these limits in an unfortunate way and we are going to raise them. I have some questions: * why are the numbers set the way they are? They aren't round numbers, they aren't powers of 2. But they were arrived at somehow with planning and thought

I still need more soak time on testing, to see whether I can: a) reproduce the hang with patch 2 not applied b) feel confident that patch 2 is sufficient to fix the race, or else determine that I also need to augment the loop condition in the reader thread to additionally break out of the loop when the pipe-to-self sees EOF even when nbd_aio_is_dead() has not yet been satisfied I'm also

The following patches come from Debian and/or Ubuntu packages of klibc. Ben. Ben Hutchings (1): [klibc] run-init: Add dry-run mode Jay Vosburgh (1): [klibc] ipconfig: Use separate sockets for DHCP from multiple interfaces Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (1): [klibc] ipconfig: Set broadcast when sending DHCPREQUEST and DHCPDISCOVER YunQiang Su (1): [klibc] mips: setjmp.S: don't

This set of patches fixes virt-rescue rather cleanly. In particular the problems with handling ^C are completely fixed. Work still to be done before this can go upstream: - Shutdown doesn't work properly if you exit the shell. At the moment to exit you must do 'reboot -f'. Future improvements: - An escape sequence and escape commands that could be handled by virt-rescue,

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-August/thread.html#00347 Thanks: Eric Blake and Daniel P. Berrangé --- common/utils/utils.h | 1 + server/connections.c | 4 ++-- server/crypto.c | 5 +++-- server/main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ common/utils/utils.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git