similar to: samba group rights problem (Domain Admins not working)

Hi, got an account on samba 3.0.14/ldap with the following rigths: jvriesman@hermes:~$ net rpc rights list jvriesman SeAddUsersPrivilege When I do a: jvriesman@hermes:~$ net rpc user ADD tgebruiker Failed to add user tgebruiker - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED The weird thing is that the user is added, so net says "access denied", but the user is added. I've attached the output of

Dear SAMBA Mailing List I am using Samba samba-3.0.9-1.3E.10, OS Centos 4.4 We have got the problem. when I am issuing a "net rpc trustdom list" command some time it is showing ok and sometime it is showing error message. and some time not. It is creating a problem to authenticate other Samba workstartion to PDC Server. 1)

Hi, I'd like to establish multiple direct connections between 2 hosts. As far as I can see, tinc doesn't allow this (when a new connection come, the old one is closed). Is seach features maybe integrated to tinc ? What is the status of 2.0 svn branch ? Thx. Manuel

Hi, some days ago we discused here the need for an analyzer for the 1000 Hz tone, as opposite application to Milliwatt. Here it is: Mwanalyze http://planinternet.net/download/voip/asterisk/app_mwanalyze.c It performs a Fourier analysis for a fixed frequency and tells the amplitude. The frequency is not limited to 1000 Hz, but can be passed as argument. The periode duration must be a mulitple

Dear all, I''ve got a working HTB configuration with iptables, fwmark, SFQ etc. At the moment, I can mark traffic and give it a maximum bandwidth and a minimum guaranteed bandwidth, so far so good. What I would like to do is the following: In stead of defining a min/max for a certain type of traffic (e.g. http, ftp whatever), I would like to define a "minimum guaranteed bandwidth

Hi, posted a message to the tinc list few days ago, but seems that there is not that much going on on that list, so I try here. The homepage of tinc says it compresses all traffic, but the manpage says that it only compresses UDP packets. Which one is true? Another thing, how much active development is going on with tinc at the moment? I see that "version 2" is mentioned. Or is there

Hi, still got the problem of NT slow logon, what am I doing wrong? This is the situation: Samba running on Unixware 2.1.1, SVR4 and RedHad. Win95 and smbclient in any unix works fine. A win NT machine sees the workgroup, but browsing to it takes a LONG time ( 3 or 4 minutes or so..) and when the machines appear ( redhat, unixware and SVR4 ) it again takes a lot of time to log on, after that

Hello, I try to exectute a command on my NT server from my unix server with the following command : smbclient \\\\monnet01\\C$ -U admin_nan -c "help.exe" C$ is my share admin_nan is the user Smbclient doesn't ask a password so i get the following error message : Anonymous login successful Domain=[FR-MON] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] tree connect failed: ERRDOS

Hi tincers, simple question, I've got a tinc vpn running over a connection which is sometimes very very slow. Now, on the homepage of tinc, it says "compression of all traffic", but in the man page "compression for UDP packets". which one is true? Cheers, Jeroen. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Dear all, I got the following situation, a share called "Bureaus", with the follwong subdirs: /Bureaus/A /Bureaus/B /Bureaus/C etc. where A,B,C.. are the bureau names under all the bureau names are directories: A/Task1 A/Task2 A/Task3 A/Archive For all the bureau names. Groups: everyone is a member of "Domain Users", and that's always the primary group. And, a group

Dear all, I got the following situation, a share called "Bureaus", with the follwong subdirs: /Bureaus/A /Bureaus/B /Bureaus/C etc. where A,B,C.. are the bureau names under all the bureau names are directories: A/Task1 A/Task2 A/Task3 A/Archive For all the bureau names. I've got groups, a groups, everyone is a member of "Domain Users", and that's also always the

Hi list, samba version: 3.0.23d-4 on debian etch. To enforce complex passwords I've added the line: check password script = /usr/local/scripts/checkpw Where checkpw is a script returning 0 if ok, and returning an error if not ok. The restrictions the script checks are: at least one uppercase, at least one lowercase, at least one number, at least one non-alphanum character and at least 8