similar to: WINS server looses election irregular in a heterogeneous network

Dear people of samba, my problem seems to be a firewalled WinXP in our net. Our Samba is the Debian testing (Samba 3.x). It is configured to hold the browsing list and to become master. The nmbd.log shows: [2004/06/09 08:17:38, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:process_local_master_announce(311) process_local_master_announce: Server PRAEPLAB at IP 129.217.168.62 is announcing itself as a local

Setup: two Slackware9.1 boxen with Samba 3.0.1 (tried 2.2.x as well), where xerxes: is a file server and shodan: is the client on xerxes there are 3 shared vfats (the errors I am going to describe occur on ext2/3 in exactly the same way) When I do: dexter@xerxes:/mnt/f/smbtest$ touch Umlaute_??? I get: dexter@xerxes:/mnt/f/smbtest$ ls Umlaute_??? Just like it should. BUT: on the client

I have 2 subnets. Subnet 1 has an NT WINS server. Subnet 2 has a Samba server acting as domain master browser and local master browser for a workgroup. If I view the network neighborhood from a Win 95 PC on Subnet 1 (call it PC_A), I can see all the hosts in the workgroup on both subnets. If I view the network neighborhood from a Win 95 PC on Subnet 2 (call it PC_B), I cannot see PC_A. I

I am having two problems, possibly related, while performing pre-deployment testing of a Samba/OpenLDAP PDC with data that was vampired from an NT4 PDC. The Samba server fails to become a local master browser, and password change attempts (from a Windows client) fail. I followed Samba-Guide/ntmigration.html (taking some liberties with various items of configuration), ending with step #19.

After running several days in the same configuration, my 3.0.6 nmbd crashed with the above error (see log below). Maybe there is a connection to this message some seconds before: register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.0.4 rejected our name registration of AK<1d> IP 192.168.0.12 with error code 6. The ip .4 machine is a win2k server, which works (or should work) as an ordinary

Greetings, I am trying to get samba3 to work well with W95. The windows 95 box can see the samba server, but cannot authenticate (claims wrong password) to get to any shares. I know the smbpasswd is good as I can authenticate and get to the shares using the same account and password on a W2000 machine. I suspect I am doing something wrong in the [global] section of the samba server. Would

Hi Dovecot: 2.2.19.rc2 OS: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) FS: XFS Problem: Dovecot it does not include line breaks in the letter. Bug or feautre? Message size in fs: 1125 bytes Message: From cras at irccrew.org Tue Jul 23 19:39:23 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list dovecot); Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:39:23 +0300 (EEST) Return-Path: <cras at irccrew.org> Delivered-To: dovecot

Hi Rowland > Possibly a firewall problem, temporarily turn off the firewall on the win7 > laptop that cannot see your rpi, if this works, you know where to look. Thanks for the suggestion. I disabled Kaspersky Internet Security Firewall and Windows Firewall but still can't see the rpi. I can, however, see the other Windows laptops (with firewall on or off). Any other thoughts

Hi all, Today our domain went down. When looking in the log it appears that a windowsXPpro machine won the election. The domain controller has an OSlevel of 65 (3.0.14a). Restarting the smb process (/etc/init.d) resolved the problem. How is it possible that the XP machine was able to win the election ? After the election the XP machine (of course) failed to become the master browser. But why

On 13/12/15 09:36, DavidA wrote: > Hi > > Here's some more info about my problem: > > ========================================== > > log.nmbd contains: > > Samba name server RPHS is now a local master browser for workgroup > HOME on subnet 192.168.2.8 > > ***** > [2015/12/12 20:48:19.709456, 0] >

Hi: Sometimes at day in my log apears these: process_local_master_announce: Server CLIENT1 at IP 192.168.1.48 is announcing itself as a local master browser for workgroup DOMAIN1 and we think we are master. Forcing election. [2006/11/17 19:41:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:unbecome_local_master_success(149) ***** Samba name server PDC1 has stopped being a local master browser for workgroup

Hello, I have been running Samba for years with no problems... I recently became the victim of the MSBLAST worm and I ran Windows Update to fix the hole in RPC. That was Tuesday. Yesterday, Thursday, I needed to move some files over to my Linux server and as I usually do, I went to My Network Places -> Computers Near Me in W2K and could no longer see my Linux server. I restarted Samba and

Anyone knows if this is something that will be looked at before b134 is released? Bug 13743 - virsh and xm is unable to start domain first time after boot http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=13743 Regards Henrik http://sparcv9.blogspot.com

Hi there. First time posting to this but I'm getting desperate so apologies for any netiquette faux pas... I'm running a Suse box with Samba on it, with Windows XP SP2 clients viewing it in a workgroup. Some pc's are having timeouts when attempting to view a network share though. In the logs, sometimes at the same time as the timeouts, this appears: [2005/07/28 13:19:08, 0]

Hello all, First, I am new to Samba so maybe I will made some mistakes in my interpretation, so be cool. since an migration from my BDC NOVA (from linux to FreeBSD, which also upgraded Samba), my BDC can't remain BDC more that a couple of days. The network it is in is a class-B heterogene network (both linux and windows). The server is alone on the network and no authentification is

Hello! Can anybody tell me what is the meaning of following logs (/var/log/messages). Feb 28 09:16:10 espl nmbd[3086]: process_local_master_announce: Server VINAY at IP 192.168.10.50 is announcing itself as a local master browser for workgroup EXCELIZE and we think we are master. Forcing election. Feb 28 09:16:10 espl nmbd[3086]: Samba name server ESPL has stopped being a local

Let's see I've got a network about 10 PCs running XP and 1 running Linux. I had setup Samba and it was running like a charm. XP pcs could access linux box through network neighborhood and access 2 shared dir and edit/change files. Really not sure what has gone wrong. I am using Samba 2.2.8a I run both smbd and nmbd as daemons. When I run ps -aux they show up. root 1553 0.0

Hello I was wondering why I cant set inet6,inet - like Protocol version 2,1 - it would be nice if I would be able to set a kind of prefer mode for IPv6 as for protocol 2. But only one argument is accepted: inet6, inet or any. At least that is what the manpage tells me, I also tested it - no way. Why is this feature not included? Will it be included? If you think it's my mistake then please

Hello, in my log.nmb I regularly see these messages: process_local_master_announce: Server GUTENBERG at IP 192.168.35.90 is announcing itself as a local master browser for workgroup PIEZO and we think we are master. Forcing election. 1998/08/10 12:57:03 ***** Samba name server FAURE has stopped being a local master browser for workgroup PIEZO on subnet 192.168.32.1 ***** 1998/08/10

I have a server which we use for backing up files. Noticed there was an upgrade available to 18.04.1. Now I cannot connect to from my win7 machine to the Ubuntu share. Any thoughts on what would have changed??? Tom