similar to: samba/network performance

Hi, i have already search for three days now but i can't find any tips. I am running a Samba PDC based on smb 3.0.23. No i want to integrate a second samba server which should serve serveral client, just to decrease the load on the pdc. This should not be a BDC, just a domain member. For user management i use openLDAP. Well, what do i need for this scenario? Do I need winbind or can i just

On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >> >> >> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>> I'm thick :D >>> I don't really understand more :( >>> >> >> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more >> enlightning: >>

Hello everybody I'm struggling against what seems a really serious trouble: sometimes mail get lost I did all the possible checks, but they seems really lost - I know is absurd, but it seems so it has been noticed by two users on my server: intially I tought that was their mistake (mail deleted, mail into spam, ecc), but it wasn't I deeply checked mail logs, and it seems that

Hello friends, I am trying to test NAS I/O performance over a network and trying to see the numbers for write and read speed. I have successfully configured and ran a lot of tests. However the numbers have not increased, I have reached a bottleneck. I tried playing around with the smb.conf file including all possible variations like, socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=(tried values like

All, I see the following message fairly frequently in our nsd.log files: error: failed reading from tcp: Connection reset by peer A quick grep through the source code reveals that this log message comes from server.c, and can come pretty much at any time during a TCP query. Since: - This condition occurs during normal operation, and - There is nothing a server operator can do about it. I

I found a message from you to the asterisk users mailing list from 2001. I was wondering if you got (or still have) an asterisk system working with the linejack? If so, would you be willing to assist me with mine? I seem to have things working, and * says that caller ID is coming in, but I can't get * to actually answer the call. Thanks, Greg -- NetIO.org

Hi all, I am trying to get some decent speed out of a vanilla Debian (Proxmox) box and am running out of ideas. Basically I can exchange data at 110MB/sec (raw, nfs, ftp) but not with Samba shares. I tried almost every samba tuning tip I could find to no avail. The only optimisation left to smb.conf at the moment is debug level = 0. As one can see the robocopy throughput is merely half of what

Dear Friend, I done configuration using RBLSMTPD with WHITELIST, but I don't know it is correct. Please check files below are corrects. Thanks Adriano === FILE WHITELIST.DOMINIO.RBL. ==== $ttl 900 whitelist.dominio.rbl. IN SOA host1.xxxxxx.com. root.xxxxx.com. ( 2006112002 ; serial; 3600 ; refresh period (1 hora); 900 ; retry time (15 minutos); 1800 ; expire tiem (30 minutos); 900 ;

I have a client (Fedora 19) and a server (Fedora 14/Samba 3.5.11) which works fine. I'm now setting up a new server (Fedora 20/Samba 4.1.3) with more or less the same smb.conf 1. Issuing: sudo smbclient -L //srv001 -U suser list all shares correct. 2. Issuing: sudo mount -t cifs //srv/Share3 /mnt/share3/ -o username=suser Password for suser@//srv/Share3: **** Retrying with upper case share

Hello Everybody! I set up a fileserver: - Pentium II, 350 Mhz, - 256MB RAM, - Intel Fast Ethernet PCI - VIA-SATA Controller - 2x500GB SATA HDD RAID 1 - Debian 4, Samba 3 - Samba set up in user shares mode without special options, but with the suggested optimizations Clients: - Windows XP Prof SP2 So far it works fine. I can read and write files without problem.

On 2015-10-30 09:07, Davor Vusir wrote: > On 2015-10-29 21:32, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 29/10/15 19:38, Davor Vusir wrote: >>> >>> >>> mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: >>>> I'm thick :D >>>> I don't really understand more :( >>>> >>> >>> No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these

Dear Friends, I am using HTB version 0.85 in CENTOS 4.4 and I configurated to limit bandwidth port 80 (hhtp) and 25 (smtp), but HTB don't work. Below , show files. [root at srv001 htb]# ls -la total 36 drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 Set 11 21:46 . drwxr-xr-x 11 root root 4096 Set 11 00:11 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19 Fev 12 2002 eth0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 89 Set 11 01:01

Hello, At this moment i setup a SAMBA 4 Memberserver. I installed the following packages: ii libwbclient0:amd64 99:4.1.9-8 amd64 Glue package for sernet-samba-libs. ii sernet-samba 99:4.1.9-8 amd64 SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix ii sernet-samba-ad 99:4.1.9-8

Hi all, we've been running a Samba4 domain with alpha17 for a few months now without any problems. However, a few days ago, something happened and now winbind can't authenticate against the domain any more. Strangely, logging into (at least one) Windows box still works, even with a user that was never used on this particular box before, and therefore can't have any cached

Hello, I have a question regarding to access permissions. Recently I have upgraded my DC from version 41.12 to 4.1.21. This weekend I have decided to upgrade to 4.3.3. I have noticed that my users weren't able to access the sysvol share after the upgraded to 4.3.3. As a test I have created a new user "test" and I was able to open the sysvol share without any issues. Next I have

Dear Help, We are in the process of setting up a new domain using Active Directory on Windows Server 2003R2. One of our goals was to use Active Directory for authentication on our AIX box (running version 6.1). I was able to successfully set up Kerberos, and the LDAP client to connect to our AD server so that you can now log in to the AIX box with users found in Active Directory. However, no

Louis, could you take a look on my case again? I am not sure that the problem is in incorrect groups. Only trusted credentials don't work. Have you any idea what the reason is? On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:50, Yakov Revyakin <yrevyakin at gmail.com> wrote: > Some more details. Below is what I have during joining Linux (Ubuntu > 20.04) to the SVITLA3 domain. SVITLA3 (Samba) is

Hello, I am running a fileserver with smbd here. The server is a 64bit 2.8 GHz Celeron D with 2GB RAM, running 64bit Debian, Samba version 3.0.23c. It is running as a pure fileserver so its only CPU load is serving files. The client I am doing the tests from is WinXP Pro SP2. It is connected via Intel e1000 gbit ethernet (both the server and client use e1000 chipsets). I have done a raw tcp

Hi, I've a strange issue with the performance of file transfers between a Samba server and a Vista client. My configuration looks like this: fileserver: Samba 3.3 on FreeBSD 6.2 ----- gbit switch ----- workstation: Vista x64 When transfering files between the two PCs, I get abount 6.5 to 7 MB / sec. On my last Vista installation I got about 40 MB / sec. I've tried the following: -

mathias dufresne skrev den 2015-10-29 14:31: > I'm thick :D > I don't really understand more :( > No. I'm having trouble explaining. Maybe these threads are more enlightning: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-April/191020.html and http://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg123646.html. > Samba can share file, printers and when samba hosts a domain samba is also