similar to: Network transfer speed issues in RHEL4

Hi: I have an rsync server providing four separate areas for rsync clients to connect to. I only have one client and it is running a backup script. The nightly backup runs fine through the first three shares until it gets to one called [webbackup]. This directory contains only 6 files and the first file it tries to get is about 400 meg in size. It begins to get this file and then the

On 2020-04-30 22:56, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:25:49AM +0200, A L wrote: > >> So I did some more tests. smbclient mget does not copy in the same way >> Windows Explorer does. When copying in Windows Explorer, there are many >> multiple concurrent threads used to transfer the files. With smbclient mget >> there are no corruptions,

Alex, I could not agree more with you. BTW, perhaps you already know, but just in case: If you want to see the patches applied to a package during its history, and you don't need to dig into the sources themselves, you can query the changelog for an rpm package without having to download sources: rpm -q --changelog package for example for my samba-3.0.10-1.4E.2 rpm -q --changelog samba *

Fabian, Fast explains. On the NT server work BrightStore with version r9, more highly does not go because of NT. On the REHL4 side works (worked) BrightStore Linux Client r11.5. Smaller version does not work goes because of RHEL4. BrightStore servers r9 and Linux Client r11.5 are not compatible unfortunately. I must now decide everything with the version Share to work to get. Or the operating

Hello, whenever I try to copy a new file from windowsXP (2K also) to a samba share which is NFS mounted on the samba server, I get an error on the client: "impossible to copy file.txt: the process cannot access the file because an other process has locked a part of it" (my english translation of the french message I have !) It worked fine before (3weeks ago) and I think that problem

Hi, I am not sure if this has been fixed already or not but I wasn't able to find any mention of it. The error I am getting is: =============================================================== [2007/04/12 22:41:00, 0, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fault_report(37) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 18617 (3.0.10-1.4E.9) Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO

Hi List, need your help, property the here following. OS / Samba = samba-3.0.10-1.4E (RHEL4) Error message in Samba logfile = Invalid key XXX given to dptr_close This message comes then if by NT server with BrighStore a Backup is started. The Backup is made by a Share. all the same with or without kernel oplocks = no level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no without success Info: Error Log from

I'm running into some errors I can't figure out. Situation: I have a Sparc IPX (2.6 Solaris), a Mac OS X box and an Ultra Sparc 1 running Solaris 9. I am trying to rsync a web site between the IPX and Ultra 1. All boxes are running 2.5.5 rsync built from source. Problem: Can't get a a sync between the IPX -> Ultra. IPX = kashmir Ultra = vortac Mac = archer Assumptions: a).

Well, it looks like we are stuck... I can't figure out what to do next. ads_connect: Program lacks support for encryption type here's the whole story: We've been using winbind successfully for over a year now, rhel3 variants(scientific linux 3), some run rhel3's default samba, others use the packages from http://enterprisesamba.com/ we started out using the NT4 compatability

I recently set up a new RHEL4 server with samba-3.0.10 in a Windows 2003 server PDC domain. I can log on as one user from different workstations on to the new samba server. With several other users, I get this error: Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: krb5_rd_req(CIFS/samba-server@MY.DOM) failed: Wrong principal in request Oct 18 16:41:34 samba-server smbd[2502]: [2005/10/18 16:41:34,

We are having a problem remounting a Windows network share. Our server is running RHEL4 ES that mounts a Windows network shares as a drive. The Windows network shares are on Windows 2003 servers. The network share can be mounted but when the Windows 2003 servers are rebooted, the mounted drives goe down. I try to reissue the mount commands but it doesn't work, it sits there and eventually

>From dcd47a609f4489bb37ce33ea1ce975bb2b3ab160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hongli Lai (Phusion) <hongli at phusion.nl> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 13:36:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Document the method for building the Unicorn gem. Signed-off-by: Hongli Lai (Phusion) <hongli at phusion.nl> --- HACKING | 11 +++++++++++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Hi List; Sorry for the OT post. However I suspect if anyone outside of RH can help with this question it would be this list. I'm starting a new contract with a shop that knows little about Linux and I'm helping pave the way. I've "inherited" an existing Linux install (RHEL4). I want to setup some tools but I find that yum is not installed. Is this normal for a RH box ? I

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Phusion Passenger in version 4.0 on CentOS Linux 7 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install rh-passenger40

I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Phusion Passenger in version 4.0 on CentOS Linux 6 x86_64, delivered via a Software Collection (SCL) built by the SCLo Special Interest Group (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/SCLo). QuickStart ---------- You can get started in three easy steps: $ sudo yum install centos-release-scl $ sudo yum install rh-passenger40

Hi Amir, this is a known and fixed issue in Samba 3.6.6. It was known as Bug 9004 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9004 and has been fixed by o Andreas Schneider <asn at samba.org> * BUG 8944 and 8567: Don't lookup the system user in pdb. Do you need a patch for 3.6.1? As far as I know (I would need to test it) with this patch Samba logs that the configured guest user

Hi, I have setup a samba server with ldap backend running on RHEL4 with the stock rpms. [# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-common-3.0.10-1.4E samba-3.0.10-1.4E system-config-samba-1.2.21-1 samba-client-3.0.10-1.4E My clients (windows xp) join the domain just fine, and I can copy files to the server with no problem. However, sometimes saving files is slow. Other times openning the files is slow. I

Our application deployed on Phusion Passenger version 3.0.17 server on CentOS 6.x box makes a AJAX call which returns a large response ranging from 1MBs to 8 MBs. It works fine a lot of time but we have seen truncated response from the server inconsistently. Its breaks are different places for the same response and is not because of escape characters. The server doesn''t break or

On 01/05/2020 13:59, A L via samba wrote: > Hi again, > > It is not always the same area. The "blank" areas seems to be early in > the files, bot not at the same offsets. > I will leave Jeremy to comment on your main problem, but you have two read only shares, which are guest only access because of these lines: ??? guest only = Yes ??? guest ok = Yes So why do you

Hi, We are running a samba server ( Version 3.0.10-1.4E.6.2 ) on a redHat RHEL release 4 (Nahant Update 3). We have a lot of errors that occurs when windowsXP clients hosts try to read from a Samba Export. We can't upgrade the Samba version because we are blocked by RHEL releases. This is the log returned by the smb server : [2006/09/22 13:53:22, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(36)