similar to: mount shares with path

Hello, I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and I'm not finding a clear answer. My company currently makes a video capture and transcoding application that runs on a Linux server. The video application mounts shares from a second Linux storage server for various users at the same time. In other words, we have: A Linux Storage Server with many accounts (for example,

Good morning. I am using samba 3.0 on RedHat Linux 9.0 and Linux machine is having lot of users and groups . I am trying to solve a problem. I have created, for example, 10 shares ( each share is having different valid users and groups ) and I can access only 4 of them (I have rights to read or write only for 4 shares). Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not

In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE (i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following: 3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted 3 OK Store completed. (UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted) [...] 6 UID EXPUNGE 1:* 6 OK Expunge completed. (At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox) Shouldn't these commands be returning

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000.

This patch exposes a generic interface which can be expanded in the future to implement USB for PVUSB, qemu, and stubdoms. It can also be extended to include other types of USB other than host USB (for example, tablets, mice, or keyboards). For each device removed or added, one of two protocols is available: * PVUSB * qemu (DEVICEMODEL) The caller can additionally specify "AUTO", in

Hallo, I've just tried kernel 3.4.6, self compiled, with the ".config" from kernel 3.3.7. Samba version 3.5.14 (slackware) When I run a script with (among many other lines) the command mount.cifs //$share/$src /path/to/$target \ -o noperm,sec=ntlmv2,$Loginparms (which runs without any problem under kernel 3.3.7) then I get an error message (some cifs problem), and the

All, If the post "Samba 3.6 -> 4.1 change that prevent sharing / - mount error(13)" makes it to the list, I apologize, but it has been over a day and I have no indication that the post ever made it to the list. The issue is that in versions prior to 4.x, I was able to create a root share in samba, but now, something prevents it from being mounted. The relevant smb.conf is:

All, I've run samba in standalone mode since the 2.0.7 days and have been though a few breakages due to version updates along the way. It seems we have hit one again in the 4.4 to 4.5 update. Specifically, the update was samba-4.4.5 => samba-4.5.0 There were no changes made to smb.conf, but the following attempted mount failed using: mount.cifs //phoinix/samba /mnt/phx -o

Hi. I just got a new Windows 7 Home Edition computer and am unable to mount its shares on my Linux system. I'm running Fedora 11, samba 3.4.7 I have no trouble mounting shares from XP systems on the network using the mount command below. I can access the Windows 7 share with no problems using smbclient on Linux. The Windows 7 share is accessible from the XP systems. Here is the mount

I'm dealing with a Linux environment with extensive automounting, that also has DFS configurations for the Windows clients of various CIFS systems. I've got CIFS automounting working for various CIFS servers, which definitely has its uses, but I'd *love* to be able to mount the DIFS published paths for the CIFS shares? Basically, if I have shares called \\example1\share1 and

I need a second pair of eyes here, please. I have a CentOS 6.6 server (let's call it 'S1") that has a Samba share on it that is currently working. We can mount that drive on our Windows work stations and transfer/delete from it just fine. It's setup as a "guest" config so no user specific passwords or any other restrictions like that. I'm trying to setup another

Hi, We have a sendmail/dovecot/squirrelmail installation that was working ok except for deleted files showing in the list with a [d] beside it. In trying to fix that issue, I apparently made a new error appear in the left navigation area: ERROR: Could not complete request. Query: CREATE "mail/Sent" Reason Given: [NOPERM] Permission denied There are no errors in dovecot, but from what

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access

I haven?t used Samba for over a decade and, from what I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the following is possible I need 2 Samba Shares for example share1 and share2, both sharing an identical location, however I want once PC to connect using share1 and everyone else to use share2 so far so good this works. However, at 1am in the morning I want to stop share2 and disconnect users whilst not effecting access via share1. Then at 2am restart share2.

Hi list! I've read some remarks here and in other places that it would be good practice to not edit the smb.conf file directly but rather keep a smb.conf.master file, edit that and then do a testparm -s > smb.conf. Here comes my problem: My smb.conf file uses some include statements. When using testparm those include lines are still in the output directly followed by the content of the

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba

A sysadmin moved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server