similar to: Strange behaviour regarding timestamps when copying files

I just discovered two directories with the same number of files and the same number of hard links but different size: # stat /home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn \ /hdsync/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn File: `/home/david/linuxburg/fax.old/docq_ps.nnnn' Size: 8192 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 801h/2049d Inode: 52060

Hi all Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS clients: [2015/10/29 15:50:38.837702, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4306(widelinks_warning) Share 'data' has wide links and unix extensions enabled. These parameters are

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: > Hi all > > Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS clients: > > [2015/10/29 15:50:38.837702, 0] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4306(widelinks_warning)

Sorry for the delay and thanks for your pointers. "allow insecure wide links" does not change the behaviour, tried that before. Which is strange, if you look at the code. On the other hand it is clearly not a static misconfiguration, otherwise I would be able to reproduce it. About half of the time, we get a PANIC about 5 to 10 minutes after these strange widelinks_warnings appear in

I suggest you try something like. Global smb.conf options: unix extensions = No allow insecure wide links = Yes Per share smb.conf options: ## and share options niet global used. wide links = yes follow symlinks = yes > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny > Verzonden: vrijdag 30 oktober

> On 29 Oct 2015, at 23:22, Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:27:49PM +0100, Thomas Werschlein wrote: >> Hi all >> >> Since we changed our installation from Samba 3.x to 4.x (currently 4.2.5 on Solaris 11.1), we repeatedly encounter the following 'widelinks_warning', originating from Windows Server 2012 R2 RDS

Dear all, We are just in a phase of considering valid alternatives to our current setup that sees glusterfs integrated to ctdb interface plus samba ADs. Do you have any suggestion for a distributed FS other than glusterfs and other than ceph that could fulfill the following: - relatively simple use and maintenance and reliable stability; - a feature like geo-replication to allow for

Dear all, we have a replica 3 configuration an issue after that the file system filled up. The gluster daemon is not starting anymore on the affected node and the inconsistency that we noticed is that the /var/lib/glusterd/peers does contain only one "good" node and the other one is missing. Now what we would like to try is to probe from the affected peer the missing one. We also

Hi All, I am using an Asterisk 1.6.2.6, and when I use this part of the dialplan: exten => 8355,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN}&IAX2/${EXTEN},18,tTWwr) exten => 8355,n,Dial(IAX2/8366,48,tTWwr) (i made that simple to exhibit issue) I got just 1 ring in 8366 extension before it hangup, what i noticed is the total time spent on ringing is 30s that means if i use 12s in the first dial i get 18s left

Ralph Giles wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:19:05PM +0100, Ian Malone wrote: > >> as artist=(composer) Beethoven), I think cast lists for films present >> a similar problem. There is consistency and indexability to be >> addressed (Ludvig van Beethoven; Beethoven, Ludvig van; >> Beethoven). > > ID3 has a concept of "sort" tags, which provide a

Dear all, Out of fairness to who has always tried to help here and to eventually help others that had our issues, we are happy to announce that our case can be considered closed at the moment. We had complained about healings not being performed and high load on our gluster vms (kvm/qemu). And tried various workarounds that kept us "afloat". Our setup includes ctdb machines on top

So 4.18.10 has this fix of the bug as observed in that respect, but I think you are seeing a broader example of that issue. NFS4 in this context is not actual NFS, but a type of unix filesystem permission system closely modelled on NT ACLs, deployed in many filesystems Samba uses, as the translation is much more direct. But even without that, it may be we are seeing the same issues, say for

Dear all, Passing from samba 4.17 to 4.18 we noticed a change in behaviour in folder/files listing. In 4.17 when someone had read and open rights for a folder but no write/modify access then the folder would be visible but clicking on any "non-accessible" resource resulted in a message notifying that no access was granted. Since 4.18 the folder is simply completely invisible. I

I sent an earlier email about failing to compile 4.2, I have since tried 4.0 and I get a configure error during make. I am running on windows XP SP2 Cygwin is (as reported by uname -a): CYGWIN_NT-5.1 pad7 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2007-12-14 19:21 i686 Cygwin Gcc is: gcc (GCC) 3.4.4 (cygming special, gdc 0.12, using dmd 0.125) I ran configure, then make. Make dies with: checking whether the C

Hi, we at forumZFD are currently experiencing problems similar to those mentioned here on the mailing list especially on the latest messages. Our gluster just doesn't heal all entries and "manual" healing is long and tedious. Entries accumulate in time and we have to do regular cleanups that take long and are risky.? Despite changing available options with different combinations

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:28:12 +0530 Silambarasan Madhappan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi , > > > We are facing below issue with below AD DC config - Samba 4.5.3 on > HP UX IA64 , > > > # ./smbclient -L localhost -U% > > Domain=[IN] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.5.3-HPE CIFS SERVER > 4.5.3.0] > > tree connect failed:

Der Rowland, We share that concerns actually and of course if there is a way to avoid it, it is always better. Another fellow suggested us an LDAP-Proxy instead (personally have never setup one). What we actually need in our case scenario, is only that service and not the rest of bells and whistles of an RODC. I just was wondering if someone had experience with what happens if one does

Again... Global ONLY smb.conf options: unix extensions = No allow insecure wide links = Yes Per share ONLY smb.conf options: ## and share options niet global used. wide links = yes follow symlinks = yes unix extensions are enabled =>> wide links are disabled automaticly. Set : allow insecure wide links = Yes I dont see it in you smb.conf.. wide links = yes

(I hope this is the right address to send this message to.) I've spent the last few days getting Xen 4.5.0 RC3 to form up Debian packages, adapting the files from xen-4.4.1-4. Would you guys like my patches? It was a non-trivial exercise, especially because of commit 2c96ecb1, which invalidated a huge chunk of the quilt patches. I thought it might save you some effort when 4.5.0 is finally

Hi , We are facing below issue with below AD DC config - Samba 4.5.3 on HP UX IA64 , # ./smbclient -L localhost -U% Domain=[IN] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.5.3-HPE CIFS SERVER 4.5.3.0] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED # # cat /etc/opt/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] netbios name = machinename realm = <MachineName>