similar to: Difference Between ver 3.2.x and ver 3.0.x

I need to mount the unix file system to Windows. Installed samba and made changes to config file smb.config There's a problem when I map the drive. Its gives me a err msg " Incorrect password or unknown user name for IPAddress\workgroup" The config file # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4 workgroup = JPROBE30 # homedir = NT - Mapped drive, eg:%H

Hi Volker, Reaching to RedHat is not the option for me right now, could you please tell me are there any configuration parameters in smb.conf which will avoid issuing NULL or Anonymous connections or sessions. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de > wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:07PM +0530, Shashi Kanth Boddula via samba > wrote:

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Samba adopts GPLv3 for future releases. --------------------------------------- After internal consideration in the Samba Team we have decided to adopt the GPLv3 and LGPLv3 licences for all future releases of Samba. The GPLv3 is the updated version of the GPLv2 license under which Samba is currently distributed. It has been updated to improve compatibility with other licenses and to make it

Hello, I have found that in smoothScatter it is not possible to reverse the axes plotted (R version 2.9.0) .   It appears that this arises from the hard coding of xlim and ylim in smoothscatter.R in the lines : x <- x[ xlim[1] <= x[,1] & x[,1] <=xlim[2], ]   (line  number 25) and x <- x[ ylim[1] <= x[,2] & x[,2] <= ylim[2], ]  (line number 31) This results in a x

Hi Volker, I am not finding anywhere the Samba 4.X RPMs for RHEL 5.X platform. Please share if you know any place from where i can download. I am afraid to build from source code. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de > wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 04:21:39AM +0530, Shashi Kanth Boddula wrote: > > Reaching to RedHat is not the option

Hi, We have software raid level 5 using 6 IDE disks amounting to about 500Gb. Its an ext3 filesystem which is NFS exported to a number of other machines. Recently, after running /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server stop /etc/init.d/nfs-common stop /etc/init.d/nfs-common start /etc/init.d/nfs-kernel-server start the whole raid array is gone. The file system is consistent and is the right size but no

This may have been raised before and if so I apologise for not being able to find it. I was wondering if someone on the list can please explain the relationship that GPLv3 has in preventing Apple from distributing updated builds with their operating systems. I've read over the GPLv3 (I'm not lawyer or anything) and I would guess it has something to do with the patent agreements? I'll

Hello Rowland, I do not have support contract with RedHat, and due to some application dependency i have to be on 5.8. No choice for me to upgrade the OS. I have choice to upgrade Samba from 3.5 to 3.6.6 through RPMs, but i am not really sure whether it solves my core issue. Coming back to my original query " CIFS Null Session vulnerability ", just i would like to understand whether

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: > >On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > >>GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > >>on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > >>DRM. > >> > >>If you find a Samba device using any

On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > DRM. > > If you find a Samba device using any Samba 3.2 or > newer that doesn't allow you to replace it, please > let us know so we can start the compliance process. I wonder how that will play out with the new

Hello everyone, I'm not sure who to ask about this, but I have a licensing question. I'm writing a utility to allow Git to connect to SMB shares, which uses libsmbclient. I was thinking about using libgit2 in my program: http://libgit2.github.com/ . This library is licensed as GPLv2 only, with a linking exception to link to any program without restriction. My understanding is that, since

El 12/03/16 a les 12:37, Rowland penny ha escrit: > Well yes, but these are usually a mass market product and will no doubt, > in the fullness of time, get to use a version of Samba 4 seeing as how > 3.6 has been EOL since March 2015. You'd be surprised to see what old shi^H^H^H "carefully crafted with backported fixes packages" router vendors put in their products. In a

Hi, I'm confused about my licensing obligation with respect to the Xapian SWIG bindings. I've got a python wrapper that sits above the standard Xapian Python/SWIG bindings, and I wasn't sure if the *intent* of the Xapian team is that my python wrapper - and any code that also uses my wrapper also falls under GPLv2. It seems unclear if the FSF's position on dynamic linking in

Could you explain more ? One people can access to one printer or each printer are one adminitrator and other people can just print ? else there are the printer admin parameter ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467

I am facing one problem with rsync. in /etc/rsyncd.conf file , one of my entry is like bellow. path = /data/Knowledge Centre With this, rsync report an error "chdir failed, no such directory". Even i tried like bellow path = /data/Knowledge\ Centre with this also, it gives the same error ? How to overcome this ? what is the right syntax ? -- Thanks & Regards, Shashi Kanth

Hello Jeremy and samba maintainers, I am using Samba 3.0.37 and I am confused about the license. On one hand both the COPYING file in the 3.0.37 tarball and your website indicates that version 3.0.37 is GPLv2. http://news.samba.org/announcements/samba_gplv3/ On the other hand, in the 3.0.37 tarball, there are many files with GPLv3 headers without any exception. For instance, several file in

On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:22 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 June 2011 14:33, Damjan Marion <damjan.marion at gmail.com> wrote: >> Problem is that in case when old binutils are used (in my case freebsd is using old one due to license upgrade to GPLv3) AS doesn't understand new mnemonics and fails. > > Indeed, this is new in ARM ARM v7. > > >> Can we change to

Greetings!!! Could you please suggest ways to build clang/llvm without libstdc++? In short, to avoid using GPLv3 libraries or tools while building clang/llvm. Thank you in advance. -Hiral -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150128/a6d24e76/attachment.html>

Hi, The Samba URL http://us3.samba.org/samba/ftp/Binary_Packages/ does not seem to have a FreeBSD binary package. I tried a web search but to no avail. I have searched the samba list archives and i could not find any pointers either. Any assistance would be most welcome Thanks in Advance, -- Vivek Varghese Cherian Free as in Freedom <www.gnu.org>