similar to: freeRADIUS + krb5 + samba + AD

I've seen that is possible to use switch port blocking with freeradius and cisco switches via 802.1X and EAP protocol. Here is more info: http://wiki.freeradius.org/FreeRADIUS_Active_Directory_Integration_HOWTO What if I don't have switch that supports 802.1X or I want that blocking is done by FreeBSD, not the switch. Because FreeBSD is the firewall or gateway to some networks. Is there

Hello all, I'm following the howto <http://wiki.freeradius.org/FreeRADIUS_Active_Directory_Integration_HOWTO> http://wiki.freeradius.org/FreeRADIUS_Active_Directory_Integration_HOWTO to integrate FreeRadius with Microsoft's AD. The first steps are to make the linux box integrate with MS Active Directory, using some of the samba tools. While working on this, I experienced some

In the configure file I find: --with-ldap LDAP support (default yes) What if I turn ldap off in that statement... What would the repercussions be? All I'm interested in doing is simple file sharing. By the way, what's the opposite of --with? --without? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Doug VanLeuven [mailto:roamdad@sonic.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:57 PM To: Roy

Hi, I've searched high and low and cannot come up with the answer to my question. Basically - I run Samba 3.5 as a PDC with openLDAP as my backend. I would love to try Samba 4.0 but I absolutely require the ability for freeRADIUS, my linux server and Cacti to authenticate against LDAP, of course this means I need to be able to add SHA512-Crypt and SSHA passwords into my LDAP db. Is this

You really meant 300 _M_bps as the upper bound according to Enterasys. My switches are from Enterasys too. After a firmware updates I get about 722 Mbps both ways. The client's disk drive (Maxtor 250 GB) can't read or write faster. If you don't get transfer rates in the immediate neighbourhood of the read/write speeds of your client's disk drives, then your network setup (hardware