similar to: Windows permissions and inheritance

I think the issue may be related to the broken trusts. First of all only two people had specifically reported issues which meant for most people it was acceptable. Then I noticed that some directories seemed slower than others. If I ssh'd into the server and checked permissions, listing permissions on most directories was quick (under 2 second.) On directories that allowed

I'm trying to use zfs acls in solaris 10. I've looked at past posts regarding this and some online help, but am stuck. I'm currently using samba 3.3.9; I've had the same problem with 3.3.7. samba is compiled and running as an Active Directory member server (compiled with ldap and kerberos). The zfs disk is local. I'm not using winbind. I compiled with zfsacl module.

Hello, New here, and I''m not sure if this is the correct mailing list to post this question or not. Anyway, we are having some questions about multi-protocol (CIFS/NFS) access to the same files specifically when not using AD or LDAP. Summary: Accessing the same folder from CIFS or NFS when working in a workgroup configuration (no domain authentication) works fine using cifs user

HI all, Having fixed the group issues from solaris having a default max of 16 groups I can now locally create and delete files on the solaris box as a domain user However when accessed via samba I can not create new files/folders (although I can delete the files I created when logged on locally) I have created a temporary directory on a non zfs (non acl enabled) file system to see if that

Hi I am accessing files in a ZFS file system via NFSv4. I am not logged in a root. File permissions look as expected when I inspect them with ls -v and ls -V I only have owner and group ACLs...nothing for everyone. bash-3.00$ id uid=100(timt) gid=10001(ccbcadmins) bash-3.00$ groups ccbcadmins staff bash-3.00$ ls -v testacl -rwxrwx---+ 1 timt ccbcadmins 0 Jan 31 16:24 testacl

In our situation, we have users home directories on a zfs filesystem which are available from both nfs and via samba. One of our requirements is that we have to prevent users on the nfs mounted systems from being able to perform a chmod on their own home directory that allows other users access to their home directories. To this end we use ZFS ACLs such that we chown the user's home directory

There are definitely some files with some weird names- in an ssh session they don't even have regular characters. e.g -rw-rw---- 1 xxx xxx 114985112 Oct 31 14:39 ▒^t Not sure if that is related to problems though. The top command shows Memory: 12G phys mem, 343M free mem, 2048M total swap, 2048M free swap This is in the evening so should not be much load but I think

Right now, FreeBSD supports one type of ACLs - so called POSIX.1e ACLs. They are natural extension of the traditional Unix permissions, and for a long time were the only nonproprietary ACL type in Unix systems. Times change, and now there are several problems with them: they never actually become standard (the draft they are based on was withdrawn); this results in minor incompatibilities

ZFS introduces a new and incompatible ACL interface into Solaris and this seems to be not yet fully completed in addition to the fact that is causes a lot of problems for software that needs to be compatible with Solaris-2.5 like star. Proof for incompatibility: create a file on UFS and set an ACL for this file. Use Sun tar cpf out file to archive this file. Unpack this archive file on ZFS

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9466 Summary: GPFS ACLs are not copied by rsync when copying between two GPFS filesystems Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

1) How can I check which ZFS filesystems still have sharesmb=on? I can''t seem to recursively list that property or other properties properly. 2) Currently I am having issues with the "extended" ACLs (NFS v4/Windows compliant?) setup by default - I am mounting it as the user that owns/supposed to own the files. Can this be turned off and the normal user/group/other type of

After a crash, in my zpool tree, some dataset report this we i do a ls -la: brwxrwxrwx 2 777 root 0, 0 Oct 18 2009 mail-cts also if i set zfs set mountpoint=legacy dataset and then i mount the dataset to other location before the directory tree was only : dataset - vdisk.raw The file was a backing device of a Xen VM, but i cannot access the directory structure of this dataset. However i

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7382 Summary: Fails to copy with ACL issue if src user is unknown (OSX 10.6 only) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2

Hi, I've recently moved our student fileserver from a Solaris 10 server that was using UFS filesytems to a new Sun Cluster. As part of the move I decided to employ ZFS for the filesystem so that I could take advantage of some of ZFS's features. However, it now seems that windows does not report the amount of space that the user is actually using, or the amount of quota left,

For the curious, the following is a list of ZFS-related bugs and RFEs integrated in build 29: 6343625 ZFS RBAC integration is incomplete 6343938 ::spa -v tried to read NULL vdev 6344502 placeholder bug for the remaining Makefile cleanup work for ZFS 6345206 zpool iostat doesn''t always line up 6345547 assertion failed: tempreserve < arc.c/4 from zfs_rename 6348792 incorrect error

As part of looking into a minor issue with the group listed when using runat(1) on a UFS filesystem for Johannes (my Google Summer of Code student work on new basic file privs), I discovered an even bigger issue with UFS and extended attributes. I''ve cc''d ZFS discuss because I used ZFS as the comparison and I believe that ZFS is acting correctly but even then it might not be

Hi everyone, I''ve been experimenting with ZFS for some time and I have one question: Is it possible to hide file with ZFS ACL ? Let me explain what I would like to do: A directory (chmod 0755) contains 3 subdirs: public, private an veryprivate public has read access to everyone (0755) private has no access at all for everyone (0750), but anyone can still see it in ls veryprivate has no

Hey folks, I'm having trouble with AD integration with the version of Samba included in Solaris build 78 (Samba version 3.0.25a). I think it's almost working, but I get an authentication prompt every time I try to connect to samba from a windows client, and no matter what I enter I can't authenticate to see the shares. The main documentation I've been using is Sun's guide

Answering my own question again, after several days of searching I've again found the solution within minutes of posting a question here. The answer to the NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE is that you need to create the /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab file: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5216293&messageID=9877661 And the windows permission setting problem appears to be due to a lack of